![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
He can't help but stick his neck out. His neck sticks out.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I've never been able to see his neck.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Peter King:
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Don't know what to make of Mack rumor, assuming it's true. I don't see any value in it as a smokescreen. If they are looking to trade the pick (and it's assumed Clowney is the most likely guy a team would trade up for), the message should be that we are high on Clowney and if you want him you have to deal with us. This rumor will just make those people pick up the phone and call St. louis.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yeah, but if you want to get ahead of whatever St Louis might do, the only way is to deal for 1-1. And if there gets to be three or four teams trying to be 1-1, very good for trade down options. Anyways, only 2 1/2 more weeks before we see what really happens. enjoying watching how this unfolds.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Last week, I was weighing whether Mack or Barr was the better option. Barr, at 6-5, can probably play with his hands down and handle the point of attack better than the smaller Mack but Mack has more LB experience, is faster, and shows some pass defense skills (4 INTs). Does 2 years in the Pac 12 count for more than 4 years in the MAC?
And would the Bills pass up the boy from the local college if he were really the best player in the draft? Could they possibly want to trade up just to be sure they get him? |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|