![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Trade for Haynesworth? | |||
| Yes, with our 2nd round pick. |
|
6 | 21.43% |
| Yes, with nothing higher than our 3rd rounder. |
|
9 | 32.14% |
| Nope. |
|
13 | 46.43% |
| Voters: 28. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
So, you mean we can spend a ton of money on a selfish jerk that will upset the salary scale for our top defenders, take plays off and act as a clubhouse cancer to boot? Sign me up!
![]() I'd rather have Richard Seymour. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't want him either. But, I think the point is, he wouldn't hurt the cap because we wouldn't be responsible for any of his signing bonus money. That all is escalated to the Redskins 2010 cap (if there was one). We would only be responsible for the yearly base salaries. So, in theory, we could cut him at any point without there being a cap hit.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
NOPE. Haynesworth only puts out when it is his contract year, otherwise he could care less.
__________________
NBT - Elder statesman. Wisdom comes with age - Now if i could remember what it was! |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
If he checked out as a decent guy, I'd take him. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I found this after my post, but he sees it the same way:
Here's Paul Kuharsky's take from his AFC South Blog. Quote:
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
For a guy who only plays in his contract year, he got more sacks than every defensive tackle on the Texans (probably combined). At the very least, he would be a good third down DT. I would say give up a third...if he causes too many locker room issues, cut him. Outside the attitude, he is what the Texans want in a DT.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
I would absolutely consider trading for him. I'm also curious about some of the concerns expressed about him as they just don't jive with my memory. First, he was most definitely not a one season wonder. He has been one of the best DTs in the league for several years. As for being a cancer, as I recall, Haynesworth was ticked when he was franchised by the Titans and wanted a new longterm deal instead. Hardly an unusual situation and one you see pretty regularly. I don't recall any locker room problems with him. If we're going to cross off every player who's pissed about being franchised, that is going to make for a pretty long list. Further, as the rumors go, Tennessee is one of the teams interested. No one knows him better than Fisher and if Fisher wants him back, that tells me everything I need to know. However, I will agree that he is somewhat injury prone and will likely miss 2-6 games a year. I would take that tradeoff though.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
What about that supposed $100M contract Albert signed with the Redskins last year? We don't want nothing to do with that!
__________________
NBT - Elder statesman. Wisdom comes with age - Now if i could remember what it was! |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
He does not go to the teams walk threw on Saturday's instead he goes to the Vols games. Also this is directed to all the pro Albert guys, did you not read that he has a $20M bonus due in a couple years? If he is on the roster that is due. His salaries in 2011 is back in the high range. The contract is still an issue, and if it's not I would have to think about him for a conditional pick, meaning a 2011 pick.
__________________
There is no failure, only feedback. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I have not heard of him being a clubhouse cancer? I Googled 'Haynesworth and cancer'. I found several references but they were all forum responses or blogs, no real incriminations except that he refuses to come to team workouts because he won't play NT and a 3-4. The team hired him to be in a 4-3 and then asked him to do something else and he refused. You might do the same at your job also. Well, you may not refuse but just look for a new job. Same-same. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|