![]() |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Similarly we our focusing a large portion of our cap into one area, again to the neglect of other positions. Certainly, everybody is correct, we are not in fact the Lions. Thank you for clearing that up. All I was saying is that other teams follies may serve as educational, in the same way history is educational. A what not to do blue print, so to speak. What teams does this saturation drafting, to the degree in which we have done, actually payoff. Didn't payoff for the Lions, didn't payoff for us, who did it pay off for? This is not a rhetorical question. A dlineman can make a bad team better, but so can a WR, and on that i disagree with you. If you have a good Oline and a good QB, your passing offense could still suck if your recievers can't uncover. Call it something analagous to the David Carr effect, one that is applicable to WRs. The Vikings had arguably the best d-line the year before last but becuase they had secondary problems they still couldn't stop anybody. Why should we continue to dedicate our resources to a position, that we have already invested the majority of our best chances to get quality players, to the neglect of other positions. That is my question. |
Bookmarks |
|
|