IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-31-2009, 12:46 PM
edo783 edo783 is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Tomball
Posts: 313
Default

I suspect that if we keep him, it would be for more for the nickel package when a cover LB is important. He and Ryan could cover well. Probably would see some time spelling the weak side backer, but probably not starting there, but ya never know.
__________________
Old age just comes at a real bad time.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-31-2009, 08:21 PM
Roy P Roy P is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by edo783 View Post
I suspect that if we keep him, it would be for more for the nickel package when a cover LB is important. He and Ryan could cover well. Probably would see some time spelling the weak side backer, but probably not starting there, but ya never know.
That's my thought. We sub in a pass-rush specialist, why not a coverage LB? He also adds some veteran presence to the lockerroom. As long as we aren't paying him starter money, but role player/mentor money, I'm all for it. Otherwise, I'll get Stephen Hodge as a UDFA and make him my cover WILL.
__________________
Originally Posted by chuck
I'm just sitting here thinking (pacing, actually) that whatever my issues with Kubiak he is apparently a goddam genius at tutoring quarterbacks.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-01-2009, 12:56 PM
nero THE zero nero THE zero is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Spring
Posts: 366
Default

The WLB plays over the RDE, no?

Which side does the "SS" (re: Ferguson/Barber) play on?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-01-2009, 02:00 PM
painekiller painekiller is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Near the Galleria
Posts: 2,852
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nero THE zero View Post
The WLB plays over the RDE, no?

Which side does the "SS" (re: Ferguson/Barber) play on?
The Will plays the weak side. In a normal formation that would be beside the RDE. But not always.

The Strong Safety will usually play on the strong side (across from the TE) and close to the line of scrimmage. Thus the saying 8 in the box.

The free safety plays a little deeper and is the better pass coverage guy, in theory.

Now some teams, using a cover-2 will have both safeties at the same depth, and one might become the all time left guy and the other the right. It is a way to disguise the coverage.

In the NFL teams try their best to disguise what they are going to do presnap, thus the Texans trying to have safeties and LBs that can play either strongside or weakside. But we have forgotten the all important ball hawk and playmaker in favor of the vanilla joe average guy.
__________________
There is no failure, only feedback.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-01-2009, 04:17 PM
nero THE zero nero THE zero is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Spring
Posts: 366
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by painekiller View Post
The Will plays the weak side. In a normal formation that would be beside the RDE. But not always.

The Strong Safety will usually play on the strong side (across from the TE) and close to the line of scrimmage. Thus the saying 8 in the box.

The free safety plays a little deeper and is the better pass coverage guy, in theory.

Now some teams, using a cover-2 will have both safeties at the same depth, and one might become the all time left guy and the other the right. It is a way to disguise the coverage.

In the NFL teams try their best to disguise what they are going to do presnap, thus the Texans trying to have safeties and LBs that can play either strongside or weakside. But we have forgotten the all important ball hawk and playmaker in favor of the vanilla joe average guy.
Yea, I meant in a normal base defense. And I ask because, assuming we sign June and he wins the job (which isn't a stretch assuming we sign him,) we would need to fortify his side of the field given his run-stopping deficiencies. Mario is a good start. It's unfortunate to hear that the SS plays the other side of the field though.

Can't say I'm in favor of bringing him in. We need to get bigger and more athletic in the LB corps. I don't think June provides that.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-01-2009, 05:05 PM
painekiller painekiller is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Near the Galleria
Posts: 2,852
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nero THE zero View Post
Yea, I meant in a normal base defense. And I ask because, assuming we sign June and he wins the job (which isn't a stretch assuming we sign him,) we would need to fortify his side of the field given his run-stopping deficiencies. Mario is a good start. It's unfortunate to hear that the SS plays the other side of the field though.

Can't say I'm in favor of bringing him in. We need to get bigger and more athletic in the LB corps. I don't think June provides that.
My bet is he would be a LB in the nickle package. Not an everydown player.

There are rumors that Adibi has gained weight, and is looking solid, if this translates to staying on the field then I'm not sure it matters who the vet signing is.
__________________
There is no failure, only feedback.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-02-2009, 12:33 AM
mussop mussop is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: livingston
Posts: 360
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by painekiller View Post
My bet is he would be a LB in the nickle package. Not an everydown player.

There are rumors that Adibi has gained weight, and is looking solid, if this translates to staying on the field then I'm not sure it matters who the vet signing is.
This is the first I have heard of this. That is great news. One thing we havent seen from Adibi yet is his ability to rush the passer. He looked like he was shot out of a cannon when he blitzed at WV. I never figured out why they didnt use him in that role more while there.

This has me curious, im going to go look up and see what Adibi's numbers were at the combine last year in the 10 yd split. It had to be good.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-02-2009, 10:54 AM
papabear papabear is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 838
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nero THE zero View Post
. It's unfortunate to hear that the SS plays the other side of the field though.
Kubiak has said he likes for his safeties to be interchangeable...which has generally meant OK against the run weak vs. the pass. Bush might change that up, but that's the philosophy Kubiak has had up until now. Same thing for OLB's. Whether or not that is a good approach is a whole different story.

As for June. It's solid depth, which is all you are likely to get this time of year. Much like Bentley was last year, he can push the young guys and help them out because of his experience, and he would be capable of starting if need be. It doesn't look like they are going to sign him, but they left the door open. This is the type of signing that makes sense this time of year...even if in this case it doesn't look like it's going to happen.
__________________
"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-BobMcNair
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-02-2009, 03:02 PM
nero THE zero nero THE zero is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Spring
Posts: 366
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by papabear View Post
Kubiak has said he likes for his safeties to be interchangeable...which has generally meant OK against the run weak vs. the pass. Bush might change that up, but that's the philosophy Kubiak has had up until now. Same thing for OLB's. Whether or not that is a good approach is a whole different story.
Where has Kubiak said this? I know his history, prior to Eugene Wilson, suggested that. But, I have never seen a quote regarding that stance attributed to him.

That's also irrelevant to my point. My point is that if June is signed and wins a starting job, we better have some formidable run stoppers on his side of the field to make up for his inability to do just that.

Last edited by nero THE zero; 04-02-2009 at 03:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.