IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The NFL Draft
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-27-2009, 06:47 PM
Roy P Roy P is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by idymoe View Post
I'm going to ask you to answer without regard to value of position. But, assume we cannot trade down.

Would the upgrade to center have greater impact than the upgrade to outside linebacker?

I've never heard a center described as a play-maker, but if our third and short percentage was significantly increased, that would be very important, imo.
Nick Mangold was probably the best OC prospect I've seen, and to that end, I'm not sure how much impact he made by himself. The Jets also drafted Brick Ferguson in that same 1st round.

While improving our 3rd and short percentage would be very important, I'm not sure how much credit would go towards Unger/Mack/Wood. Also, there is a good possibility to get Wood at #45 or even Anoine Caldwell at #77.

If we can't trade down from #15, we should not draft any OC and expect them to make an impact more than we could expect from one drafted in the 2nd or 3rd round.

If Kubiak is hell bent on getting a "difference maker" on the defensive side of the football that won't be easily matched later on in the draft, I'd suspect he's looking at Vontae Davis or Malcolm Jenkins.
__________________
Originally Posted by chuck
I'm just sitting here thinking (pacing, actually) that whatever my issues with Kubiak he is apparently a goddam genius at tutoring quarterbacks.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-27-2009, 06:59 PM
idymoe idymoe is offline
Veteran Depth
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 158
Default

Wood might be iffy at 45 and I wasn't very impressed with Caldwell at the Senior Bowl. How would you compare Unger and Mack to Mangold?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-27-2009, 08:10 PM
jppaul jppaul is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 343
Default

Its harder to judge the impact a center has on an offense as compared to OLB. Oline as a group make an impact but it is hard to point to any of the interior line as having an impact. I know that they do its just harder to ascertain.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-27-2009, 08:24 PM
Roy P Roy P is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by idymoe View Post
Wood might be iffy at 45 and I wasn't very impressed with Caldwell at the Senior Bowl. How would you compare Unger and Mack to Mangold?
Mack didn't participate at the Combine. However, if you sum the 20, 10, Shuttle, and Cone; you'll get an idea about an OL's agility and their feet. Mangold's total was 16.55
Wood totaled 16.59
Unger totaled 16.63

If you are looking at power and explosion, add the Bench Reps, Vertical, and Jump.

Mangold = 60.17
Wood = 68.75
Unger = 54.17

I like to take those two composites to get an index of power and agility, and I disregard the 20. Mangold's 20 was 2.95, Wood ran 2.84, Unger clocked 2.96.

Mangold = 4.42
Wood = 5.0
Unger = 3.96

So, that's the measurables.

Mangold had much better pass-protection skills than any of these guys because he got into his stance so quickly after snapping the ball. Mangold also gets off his block quickly to get to the next level. In terms of run blocking, Mangold uses good leverage.

Unger is probably a better Left Guard than Center. Having been moved around in college probably made him more versatile, but it didn't allow him to work on the specifics of OC.

Mack is probably the best pure OC in the draft. In pass protection he is going to have trouble with big NTs. Unlike Mangold, he doesn't get into a strong blocking position after snapping the ball.

Wood has all the athletic tools I'm looking for in a ZBS OC. While he has athleticism, he also has a solid punch to road grade on the run. He could use some work on pass-protection, but I'm pretty sure Gibbs can whip him into shape. With Mack and Unger getting all the hype, I'm hopeful Wood will slide on down to #45. He can also play RG while learning the offense.

If I were ranking them in the draft, I'd rank Mangold #22, Wood #27, Unger #33, and Mack #39.
__________________
Originally Posted by chuck
I'm just sitting here thinking (pacing, actually) that whatever my issues with Kubiak he is apparently a goddam genius at tutoring quarterbacks.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-27-2009, 08:39 PM
idymoe idymoe is offline
Veteran Depth
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 158
Default

Nice analysis. Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-27-2009, 08:42 PM
idymoe idymoe is offline
Veteran Depth
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 158
Default

Roy, how do you think Myers stacks up against Wood, Unger & Mack. I doubt there are measureables for him, but from watching him play, what do you think?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-27-2009, 08:51 PM
Roy P Roy P is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by idymoe View Post
Roy, how do you think Myers stacks up against Wood, Unger & Mack. I doubt there are measureables for him, but from watching him play, what do you think?
Myers is surviving on his technique and knowledge of Gibbs' system. All three of the guys I mentioned are better prospects and would push Myers into a back-up role their Sophomore year after learning the responsibilities of the OC position. Myers is the savvy veteran getting by with his wisdom and the fact that there isn't any talent behind him.
__________________
Originally Posted by chuck
I'm just sitting here thinking (pacing, actually) that whatever my issues with Kubiak he is apparently a goddam genius at tutoring quarterbacks.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-27-2009, 09:03 PM
idymoe idymoe is offline
Veteran Depth
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 158
Default

That's pretty much my opinion, too, although I see you think it would take a season to win the start. I know Kubiak has said the #1 pick is expected to start right away. I do think a lot of our problems in third and short lie at center.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-28-2009, 10:50 PM
Roy P Roy P is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by idymoe View Post
Nice analysis. Thanks.
For some in depth analysis on Wood, check this out. It's about everything you'd want to know. Included is that he has 33 3/4" arm length. Somebody mentioned that he had "short" arms. That's the same length as OT prospect Jason Smith.

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/players/522812

Wood ranking second among the nation's centers with 16 touchdown-resulting blocks.

He not only brings incredible knowledge and instincts to the field, but plays with the true nastiness that has scouts comparing him to the NFL's old time centers like Mike Webster of the Pittsburgh Steelers and Tim Grunhard of the Kansas City Chiefs.


Anyone who might question his intensity needs only see him fighting tooth and nail to the final gun in a 69-14 loss to Rutgers in 2008. He always brings his "A" game to the field, no matter what the scoreboard says.

Wood is known for residing in the film room. He is very determined to break down every aspect of his opponent and search for what he can use to his advantage. He does all the little extras you would expect from a team leader and captain.
__________________
Originally Posted by chuck
I'm just sitting here thinking (pacing, actually) that whatever my issues with Kubiak he is apparently a goddam genius at tutoring quarterbacks.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.