![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Could be worth 6 million tells me it's gauranteed for less. If he doesn't work out I would guess it's a pretty pain free cut after year 1. Although with the collective bargaining agreement up in the air it's impossible to say. I'm still curious as to why they did three years though. It might just be a way for the agent to make it sound like he got his client a much better deal than he really did.
He's had a few years in the league to grow into the position (something I strongly believe is necessary at this position) so we could be getting him at the right time. Who knows? This is one of those signings that I see a bunch of people getting upset about as being just another guy. That's what you are going to get this time of year. If he steps it up and upgrades the line play it's a great deal. If all he does is provide decent depth in the rotation then it's a solid signing. Not every free agent signing has to be, or can be, a home run.
__________________
"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-BobMcNair |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think Smith has done pretty well with these mid level free agents. Ferguson was solid last year, Wilson was solid, Andre Davis, Ryan Moats, etc.
Seems like another one of those signings to me. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Now, these players have had different careers starting off, to say the least. However, we may be getting a talented player in Cody. Unlike Roosevelt Colvin and Ahman Green, he should still have something in the tank. I'm not going to say that this is a home run, but the risk appears to be low and the potential benefit is high. We definitely needed to replace Zgonina and perhaps it would be nice to part ways with TJ. I think he's a bit of a loose cannon from what I see. So, I'm on board with this signing. ![]()
__________________
Originally Posted by chuck I'm just sitting here thinking (pacing, actually) that whatever my issues with Kubiak he is apparently a goddam genius at tutoring quarterbacks. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
His spot needs to be upgraded. I won't argue that at all, but where does the "loose cannon" part come in?
__________________
"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-BobMcNair |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
He may even be an upgrade over TJ. His production is about the same across their carrers, his numbers were slightly better last year, and TJ has been a starter for 3 years where Cody hasnt. And Cody has played on a much more talented line.
They have both had 4 years, each with most of one lost to injuries. At this point I am hoping one of them shines, but at this point I would rather see us find some better starting talent. At worst he is a good DL rotaion guy that can play either side. The biggest question mark here is will that NT be played the way they have been or is Bush going to play them in a manner that better suits a light in the but NT. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Remember that Cody's best year in College came as a DE...they could look to use him in a similar way to Bullman.
__________________
"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-BobMcNair |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Coming out of USC the report on Cody was that he was a quick, explosive DT who was best at shooting the gaps and struggled when he had to take on blocks, especially double teams -- very similar to Bulman's, although Cody was considered a much better prospect. I'm not sure how the Lions used Cody but he seemed like he'd be a perfect fit as the undertackle in Marinelli's defense. Obviously from the lack of production that didn't quite pan out.
As far as playing him much at DE, his short arms would probably make him a bad match up against NFL OTs. He'd probably have to do a lot of stunting and moving to keep them from getting their hands on him and neutralizing him. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|