IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-31-2008, 11:49 AM
painekiller painekiller is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Near the Galleria
Posts: 2,852
Default

Remember all the big names we had listed when Kubiak was hired and he wanted Frank Bush and Richard Smith? Not Jim Bates, not Jerry Gray.

No matter what we want it's who Kubiak wants that matters.
__________________
There is no failure, only feedback.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-31-2008, 01:35 PM
Maninthebox Maninthebox is offline
On the Sidelines
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Woodlands
Posts: 7
Default

All I can say is Hallelujah on the Smith firing! I know the offensive turnovers and redzone collapses didn't help the defense or help us win games. BUT, giving up over 30 points six times and averaging 28 ppg or whatever, that's ridiculous!

As for Bush, I find it hard to believe that as bad as this defense was, we had the answer under our nose the whole time. If Smith was struggling and Bush was the answer, why not let him call a game or two. Why wouldn't Bush try and help Smith? If he did try, then he wasn't successful and he doesn't deserve the job.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-31-2008, 03:14 PM
NBT NBT is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Texas Coast
Posts: 1,836
Default

I banged the drum long and hard on this board for Richard Smith's dismissal, so I can't crawfish now, but it did seem that he was just doing what Kubes told him to. Oh well, on to a new DC.

I agree that Frank Bush is here, and he was the choice even before Richard Smith. I would sure like to see Greg Williams get a shot at our perenially underperforming defense, though. If Marinelli would come all the way down to being a defensive line coach again, I would love to see him do that for the Texans, but I think that is farfetched.
__________________
NBT - Elder statesman. Wisdom comes with age - Now if i could remember what it was!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-01-2009, 01:08 AM
Keith Keith is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roy P View Post
Why not take a look at bringing in Jerry Gray to run the defensive side of the ball?
Heck yeah. I've brought up Gray's name here before, like here.

Quote:
Originally Posted by painekiller View Post
Remember all the big names we had listed when Kubiak was hired and he wanted Frank Bush and Richard Smith? Not Jim Bates, not Jerry Gray.

No matter what we want it's who Kubiak wants that matters.
Well, he maybe didn't want Gray because he interviewed against him for the HC position. Awkward! So I don't think Gray was a serious DC candidate back then, but if Kubiak is serious about giving someone other than Frank Bush a shot, then Gray ought to be heard from again.

But as you say, Kubiak is probably more interested in hiring the familiar.

Speaking of...

Quote:
Originally Posted by painekiller View Post
For the DB/CB David Gibbs of the KC Chiefs, formally of the Broncos. He is son of Alex. David has a solid track record and it would please Alex, which means he might stay longer.
Wow, how did I not think of this? Seems like an ideal hire for Kubiak. Would need to find a way to get the Chiefs to allow him to interview here, a la with something more than a lateral move, assuming Gibbs the Younger is still employed by KC in 2009 (situation with asst. coaches in KC is somewhat up in the air I think). Anyway, just asking him to be our DB coach if he is retained by KC would require their permission if I understand the rules correctly here.
__________________
Support ...IntheBullseye.com and follow us on Twitter
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-02-2009, 06:34 PM
HPF Bob HPF Bob is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,149
Default

It wouldn't shock me at all to see Ray Rhodes move up to DC. He has both DC and HC experience and he's already under contract. Jerry Gray wouldn't hurt my feelings in the least but I'm sure it will cost less to promote your experienced assistants who are already here and hire assistants to replace them rather than go out and sign a new DC.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-02-2009, 07:23 PM
kravix kravix is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 285
Default

While I wouldnt mind seeing Rhodes step in as DC, i seriously doubt that it would happen. He came out of retirement to be an assitant, and like Gibbs, stated that he didnt want all the responsibilities of coordinator. I think he is happy where he is.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-03-2009, 12:06 AM
edo783 edo783 is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Tomball
Posts: 313
Default

I doubt very much that Rhodes would take the DC job. He has some serious health issues that prevent him from putting in the hours and taking the stress that comes with a DC position.
__________________
Old age just comes at a real bad time.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.