IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-20-2008, 06:57 AM
nunusguy nunusguy is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,399
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith View Post
As for Kubiak... for a guy willing to stick his neck out on a pick like Mario over Reggie, he seems slow to react to problems on defense. I think sometimes someone needs to remind him to get more involved on the other side of the ball.
Honestly, isn't it really possible Gary is in over his head ? And I don't dislike him, I only want whoever the Texans HC is to succeed. He could be a very capable Offensive coordinator and that's it. You know, the old "Peter Principle".
And no he's not bashful about making decisions about the D. Remember he not only decided to take Mario instead of a very popular offensive player(but to Kubiaks credit, a player he correctly recogonized as overrated), if you recall he made the decision to switch to the 4-3 from the Capers 3-4 ?
But one of Gary's problems IMO is that he has a tendency to be just too loyal to a coach or player.
And I've always thought it was very strange that Gary was incapable of wathcing a field-goal attempt in a tight game ? And he's also admitted looking away on other key plays down by the goal-line. Strange for a HC !
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-20-2008, 04:15 PM
NBT NBT is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Texas Coast
Posts: 1,836
Default

It's possible, but with 2 SuperBowl wins behind him as an OC, I find it more than a little hard to believe. The problem, as I see it, is we are better in the second half, 4th quarter having to come from behind. The defense, for whatever reason, cannot hold a lead or put up aggressive numbers. So this week we ran up a big lead, then the offense seemed to sit on it with the exception of the one 3rd quarter TD. The D played out of position, took bad angles, and generally underperformed. The party line was that we need to learn how to finish. Well yes, that is true, but the poor defense is the result of poor coaching as much as personnel. To me the most puzzling question is why hasn't Kubiak shook up that defense?
__________________
NBT - Elder statesman. Wisdom comes with age - Now if i could remember what it was!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-20-2008, 06:42 PM
Big Texas Big Texas is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,469
Default

If by shake up you mean fire R.Smith. Then Ok. But so far he has:

benched faggins on a couple occasions

brought him back into the starting lineup.

He called out Travis Johnson practically when he first got here.

he has dropped Okoye to passing downs only.

He's brought bulman, cochran, and the Deljuan Robinson into the rotation.

He brought in "the blind roadrunner" Jacque Reeves

Got rid of the always out of position Glenn Earl, brought in Will Demps

brought in, started, then benched again F. Bennett

Decided to start Z. Diles

Somehow nothin on this list jumps out at me. Until this list improves we will continue to be where we are. A defense with no identity. What are we trying to create here. Or are we just putting square pegs in round holes. Lets pick a defensive identity and create it.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-21-2008, 09:26 AM
cadams cadams is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 461
Default

they need a headhunter on defense that receivers have to worry about when they are crossing the middle. big hits rattle receivers and fire up the rest of the defense.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-21-2008, 09:44 AM
papabear papabear is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 838
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Texas View Post

A defense with no identity. What are we trying to create here. Or are we just putting square pegs in round holes.
You can definitely say that we have no identity on defense. There have been plenty of attempts to shake up the defense...more than just the personnel moves. They have blitzed more recently. I saw Diles blitz several times (it worked once). A few weeks ago they tried to do some Zone blitzing. They played a lot of Zone early....Sun they were in a lot of man. The corners have also been playing closer to the line of scrimmage lately....yes even Petey.

Maybe that's the problem. We keep trying new things and never do them long enough to get really good at them. I don't know if that's the only problem, but I a least see effort there to try new things.
__________________
"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-BobMcNair
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.