![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Brown was the 14th rated OT last year. There is no way he was going to be better as he got older. He'll play at most 10 games this year after playing 12 last year and 14 the year before. None of those things are up for debate. I will not pretend the comments this week were not a part of him getting dealt. I think Brown made those comments to get out (I'm not saying he doesn't believe them, but I think he knew it was a get out of jail free card). I am amazed that with McNair's comment and Brown's comments swirling we got a 2nd and a 5th. I have no problem with punting on this season. This season was lost as soon as Watt and Mercilous got hurt. I'm also not overly worried this exposes Watson. The odds that he gets hurt on the 2-3 extra sacks and 10-15 extra hits (maximum) that Watson takes with Clark vs Brown are very small. The odds that whatever injury he might take because of Clark playing being an injury that affects him going forward after this season are even smaller. I think the odds those picks help us more than Duane Brown in 2018 and beyond are way higher than the odds Watson is hurt in 2018 and beyond because Duane Brown wasn't here in 2017. And again, I say you'd complain just as loudly with the same complaints if we traded a 2nd round pick for a mostly used up guy on the back end of his career. Last edited by barrett; 10-31-2017 at 04:52 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How loudly do you suppose I'd complain if the Texans, oh, I don't know, gave away a second round pick to get rid of a 70 million dollar albatross who put up historically terrible numbers and could not even make the team in Cleveland?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This basically says what I've been trying to say but with more stats and fewer gratuitous insults:
https://www.battleredblog.com/2017/1...de-an-analysis |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Anyone who was debating that is an idiot. The better question to me is what helps you more in an effort to win a championship. 25 or less games of Duane Brown, or a 5th and 2nd round pick? Because we aren't winning any titles this year even with 5 Browns. Next year is a real possibility as good as Watson is (assuming Mercilous comes back). But next year will also have JJ Watt's shell taking up 1/5 of our cap. Of course the way we run things, we'll keep paying JJ until 2025 because the locals love him. We will at least pretend he comes back next year and will keep paying him until at least 2020. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Some have been making the case that keeping Brown around was not worth the headache.... YMMV
The schedule really lightens up a bit. Sun, Nov 5 vs Indianapolis 1:00 PM CBS Sun, Nov 12 @ Los Angeles 4:05 PM CBS Sun, Nov 19 vs Arizona 1:00 PM FOX Mon, Nov 27 @ Baltimore 8:30 PM ESPN/WatchESPN Sun, Dec 3 @ Tennessee 1:00 PM CBS Sun, Dec 10 vs San Francisco 1:00 PM FOX Can't see the Texans being large dogs in any of these - LAR and Baltimore on the road being the likely candidates for the small underdog role.... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
-------------- |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
That doesn't impact whether a 2nd and 5th is a good return for Duane Brown. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't think the trade was any sort of revenge for Brown speaking out on Inmategate. He wanted out. There was some speculation, before McNair's comments became public, that Brown returning when he did (a week earlier than necessary to get credit for the season) and the Texans getting him immediately into the lineup (although he was also the best option, even if rusty) was part of an understanding that it was necessary to show the Seahawks and whatever other teams might've been interested that Brown was healthy, in shape, and ready to go after the holdout.
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|