IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The NFL Draft
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-02-2016, 08:58 AM
nunusguy nunusguy is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,399
Default

The 2016 NFL Draft features plenty of talent at the quarterback position, but it's spread out between a dozen (or more) prospects.

That's unlike a year ago when it was obvious that the top two prospects -- Jameis Winston and Marcus Mariota -- were relatively transcendent underclassmen (and then a steep drop-off in talent after them), the 2016 draft is loaded with projects.

The crop was significantly boosted Thursday with the expected announcements that the top two quarterbacks on NFLDraftScout.com's board -- Paxton Lynch (Memphis) and Jared Goff (California) - were forgoing their senior seasons and heading to the NFL.

Lynch (6 feet 6, 230 pounds) possesses all of the physical tools to excite scouts, including rare agility for a man of his size and a hose for an arm. However, rather than end his career with a bang, Lynch struggled mightily in a 31-10 loss to Auburn, raising all kinds of questions about the steep learning curve he'll face in the NFL.
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/n...ing-guarantees
****
Good deal, looks like some of these top-rated underclassmen at QB are declaring for the NFL Draft.
Since we are definitely in the market for a QB and very likely drafting one early, which I think means the first 2 rounds. So this upcoming off season should be especially interesting for the Texans and their fans.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-02-2016, 04:51 PM
WMH WMH is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,795
Default

Might as well add Hackenberg to the list. He officially declared today. I assume most of the media outlets will have us tied to the hip.

I'm not as confident as most in that a Rd. 1/2 QB is a sure thing. We'll see in May.
__________________
In B'OB we trust, until he pisses us off!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-02-2016, 07:10 PM
Keith Keith is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Yes, Hackenberg should be listed. The O'Brien-Penn St. ties are there. Not that the Texans have taken a single PSU player over the last two years, but it could happen.

There's also been talk about Cook being a douche and not much of a team leader. It's tough this time of year sorting between what we can see and what we just won't know about a player medically or personally. Always wary of misinformation.

I have Goff and Lynch at 3 and 4, but at this point it seems both will be taken before any other QBs and likely before the Texans have an honest chance. That said, who knows... this will be an interesting couple months since there is not an Andrew Luck or Cam Newton here that is clearly at the head of the class.
__________________
Support ...IntheBullseye.com and follow us on Twitter
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-03-2016, 01:13 AM
painekiller painekiller is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Near the Galleria
Posts: 2,852
Default

Don't know if I have Cook at the top of my want list, but I agree there is no clear #1, only a top 4 or 6 guys.

And all seem to be projects.
__________________
There is no failure, only feedback.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-04-2016, 08:42 PM
Arky Arky is offline
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 9,291
Default

I think they're going to go after Hackenburg. It's only fitting.

He's shown some flaws in the past couple of years without OB around and OB, I'm sure, probably thinks he can fix him. Might be possible to get him in the second round but a lot still to shake out before the official draft. My guess is that the really top prospects won't make it to where we pick in the 1st round.

Playing QB for the Texans the last couple of years has been a meat grinder so whoever is chosen, especially if they are an underclassman, should sit and learn for at least a year... So, we may be looking at another year of Hoyer/Weeden/Savage/whomever placeholding....

I'd like to see Savage get more of a chance next year while the rookie watches from the sidelines.......
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-04-2016, 10:03 PM
WMH WMH is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,795
Default

I'm still holding on to my hope/theory that our QB room will be Brees, Hoyer, and Savage/Rookie.
__________________
In B'OB we trust, until he pisses us off!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-05-2016, 08:27 AM
popanot popanot is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,916
Default

I think we're certainly out of range for Goff/Lynch and likely out of range for Cook now. Even at that, I sort of like Wentz's potential better than Lynch/Cook and hope he's there when we draft. If we want a QB in RD1, we might have to move up a bit to get him. As I see it, the Browns, Cowboys, 49ers, Saints, Eagles, Rams, Bills and Jets could potentially go QB. Some (Browns, 49ers, Rams, Jets) obviously to a larger degree than others.

1 Tennessee Titans 3-13 0.188
2 Cleveland Browns 3-13 0.188
3 San Diego Chargers 4-12 0.250
4 Dallas Cowboys 4-12 0.250
5 Jacksonville Jaguars 5-11 0.313
6 Baltimore Ravens 5-11 0.313
7 San Francisco 49ers 5-11 0.313
8 Miami Dolphins 6-10 0.375
9 Tampa Bay Buccaneers 6-10 0.375
10 New York Giants 6-10 0.375
11 Chicago Bears 6-10 0.375
12 New Orleans Saints 7-9 0.438
13 Philadelphia Eagles 7-9 0.438
14 Oakland Raiders 7-9 0.438
15 St. Louis Rams 7-9 0.438
16 Detroit Lions 7-9 0.438
17 Atlanta Falcons 8-8 0.500
18 Indianapolis Colts 8-8 0.500
19 Buffalo Bills 8-8 0.500
20 New York Jets 10-6 0.625

I think a lot of it depends on if the Cowboys stand pat with Romo and go another position (which I think they will), the Saints re-sign Brees (which I think they will), and the Eagles re-sign Bradford (which I think there's a good chance they do). If that happens, I feel we'd have to jump up to pick 11-14 for Cook/Wentz (or QB3), or pick 14-18 for Cook/Wentz (or QB4). If all those guys are gone, Hack might be the next option in RD2, but I think we'd have to move up in that RD to get him. This is assuming some other QB prospect doesn't rise up the board. I think there are few other guys that rate right around where Hack is currently rated. I'm OK with going into next year with Hoyer as the bridge QB, but yeah, they need to address QB now and try something!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.