![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
There's been some talk of drafting two QB's - one early, one late. If that happens, probably a lock that Keenum and Yates are both out the door, i.e. OB getting "his" guys in here....
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Think I heard somewhere that Falcons say they don't plan to trade up.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm guessing it's Clowney or a trade down. I hope they can find a trade partner because I don't want a replay of the last 7 years where we take the physically gifted DE with questionable motor to build a defense around with the hope that if the defense is a good enough we can get get by with an average QB acquired with a 2nd round pick. Where have I heard that story before?
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Isn't that what Seattle just did?
This year best player may not be a QB so what do you do? Probably not good to reach for a QB? This site has interesting Superbowl QB history. http://www.drafthistory.com/index.ph..._quarterbacks/ Last edited by Nconroe; 05-03-2014 at 09:36 AM. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
As for what i think the Texans should do, pick the QB you think has the best chance of developing into an elite QB, unless you absolutely don't think any of these guys have that potential. To me, this was part of the job O'Brien was hired for and is his first real test. With the rule changes and the way the game is evolving, the position is too important. I don't care if there are a couple other guys who are higher rated. If the QB pans out, he's worth more than them.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
So we should have taken David Carr over Julius Peppers in 2002 and Vince Young (or Matt Leinart) over Mario Williams in 2006? Great thinking.
The Texans have been here before, not once but twice. The one thing they didn't do the previous times was to trade down for more choices. That's what I'd like to see them do since even the elites seem to come with red flags. Otherwise, how about using 1/1 for the guys with the fewest red flags - Jake Matthews or Khalil Mack? |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|