![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
us: 3000/Texans-2340(1800+540)Browns. In other words its meaningless most years unless a teams got an an Andy Luck or Peyton Manning to deal. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I agree that we don't have a franchise QB in this draft and a trade down would likely mean less value in return. However, if a #1 and a #2 is all that is needed, you won't need the Browns. I think the Falcons may be the better trade partner because they seem to genuinely want Clowney, already have a starting QB and are thinking their awful season can be fixed with better health, better luck and a few new parts.
I'd accept the Falcons' 1-6 and 2-6 plus a 2013 2nd for our #1 spot and use the 1-6 for an offensive tackle or a blitzing LB (or Sammy Watkins if you want to get exotic). We fill a hole, add another Top 40 pick and add a second-rounder for next year while the Falcons get the DE they covet. Some mocks have the Rams doing this deal on the premise we aren't taking Clowney but there's no reason we can't cut out the middle man and do it ourselves. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I feel like I'm more and more on an island in my belief that Teddy Bridgewater is a franchise QB...
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Probably with a small population. I like Bortles in O'Brien's system and I like Gorappolo in that I could get him with a 2nd round pick (reducing my risk).
__________________
Originally Posted by chuck I'm just sitting here thinking (pacing, actually) that whatever my issues with Kubiak he is apparently a goddam genius at tutoring quarterbacks. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
D'oh! I meant 2015. Need to wake up earlier.
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|