IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-06-2013, 03:56 AM
Arky Arky is offline
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 9,291
Default

Yeah, not a good showing by Case vs. Jax. Not pitiful but he's seems to run into a wall at times... not really encouraging.

Strange because he had a pretty good showing against New England. I'd still prefer he get the remainder of the starts over the other two..... And if he struggles again, bring in one of the others as a relief pitcher...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-06-2013, 10:33 AM
cadams cadams is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 461
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arky View Post
Yeah, not a good showing by Case vs. Jax. Not pitiful but he's seems to run into a wall at times... not really encouraging.

Strange because he had a pretty good showing against New England. I'd still prefer he get the remainder of the starts over the other two..... And if he struggles again, bring in one of the others as a relief pitcher...
i think they should let andre play qb the rest of the year. that would at least give us something interesting to watch
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-06-2013, 10:37 AM
HPF Bob HPF Bob is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,149
Default

Keenum isn't accurate enough at this level and still indecisive at times. Part of that is inexperience but some of it has to be the player itself. Schaub came in and his knowledge of the offense allowed them to go hurry-up to get back in it but then ended the night with a pick and a sack.

Interesting how different the offense is with these two QBs. With Schaub, it's all five-yard crossing routes (even when we need 10-15 for a first down). With Keenum, it's more ad-libbed and less timing.

I still think I'd rather take Clowney or Matthews at 1-1 then take a QB to develop in Round 2. There's nothing wrong with keeping Schaub or Case and letting the development QB ease his way into the pros instead of being "the guy" in Week 1.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-06-2013, 11:41 AM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HPF Bob View Post
Keenum isn't accurate enough at this level and still indecisive at times. Part of that is inexperience but some of it has to be the player itself. Schaub came in and his knowledge of the offense allowed them to go hurry-up to get back in it but then ended the night with a pick and a sack.

Interesting how different the offense is with these two QBs. With Schaub, it's all five-yard crossing routes (even when we need 10-15 for a first down). With Keenum, it's more ad-libbed and less timing.

I still think I'd rather take Clowney or Matthews at 1-1 then take a QB to develop in Round 2. There's nothing wrong with keeping Schaub or Case and letting the development QB ease his way into the pros instead of being "the guy" in Week 1.
I agree Bob, I'd go Clowney over Matthews for sure, but I agree that I don't like any of the 1-1 QB options.

And I hope Case catches on somewhere like GB next year. I think he can play, but he is almost like a relief pitcher with one great pitch that gets knocked around if he goes through the order twice. He should be a spot starter and save the day in relief guy (Flutie). He struggles when you gameplan for him. Imagine him in GB this year savin gthe Packers season by winning 3 out of 4 when Rodgers goes down. Or having a Hostettler run to a superbowl. I think that is the ceiling for him.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.