IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-28-2012, 09:38 AM
HPF Bob HPF Bob is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,149
Default

Since this was written in 2009 for the 2010 season, the AFC West rotation should already be modeled for us.

Quote:
Teams that have road games against Denver and Oakland will get home games against Kansas City and San Diego. The opposite scenario will also be true. The same format of home-and-away games with the paired cities holds true for the NFC as well.
In 2010, we played Oakland and Denver on the road (remember the Tebow game?)

2010 results from Pro Football Reference.com

Therefore, we should get Oakland and Denver at home, Kansas City and San Diego on the road. As for the NFC West, it's still an open question whether we get a road trip to SF or Seattle but apparently not both.

Two additional points:

1) It's just the coincidence that our rotation brought us the NFC West and the AFC West in the same season. This is apparently what happened to the NFC East in 2008 that prompted the changes.

2) While people might not be sympathetic about Houston flying to the west coast multiple times, the division also contains Jacksonville and Tennessee which are in the Eastern time zone (Indy might be too).
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-28-2012, 12:39 PM
chuck chuck is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,845
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HPF Bob View Post
2) While people might not be sympathetic about Houston flying to the west coast multiple times...
I don't see what the hell the problem is.

-Jim Crane
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-28-2012, 01:02 PM
Joshua Joshua is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 549
Default

I get the time zone issues and acknowledge that there may be something to that, but the travel stuff is overblown in my opinion.

I don't recall where I heard it, but I heard someone ask a pretty funny question--Is there any other profession where a first class/chartered jet flight to a posh 5-star hotel where every possible thing you might need will be provided to you, largely free of charge and without you needing to do much more than ask, is discussed as if it is some horrific burden? Has anyone ever said that, for example, a businessman or a lawyer was understandably not at his best today because he had to take a first class flight into town the day before and stay in a suite at the Four Seasons?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-28-2012, 01:56 PM
chuck chuck is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,845
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshua View Post
I get the time zone issues and acknowledge that there may be something to that, but the travel stuff is overblown in my opinion.

I don't recall where I heard it, but I heard someone ask a pretty funny question--Is there any other profession where a first class/chartered jet flight to a posh 5-star hotel where every possible thing you might need will be provided to you, largely free of charge and without you needing to do much more than ask, is discussed as if it is some horrific burden? Has anyone ever said that, for example, a businessman or a lawyer was understandably not at his best today because he had to take a first class flight into town the day before and stay in a suite at the Four Seasons?
You have to remember that the impetus for all of this was the Patriots who can't look at a picture of the beach without getting sand in their collective vagina.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-28-2012, 05:49 PM
HPF Bob HPF Bob is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,149
Default

A flight to KC or STL shouldn't be that taxing but taking a trip from the East Coast to Phoenix or Denver isn't feel that much better than traveling to Seattle or San Diego.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-28-2012, 06:38 PM
Keith Keith is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck View Post
You have to remember that the impetus for all of this was the Patriots who can't look at a picture of the beach without getting sand in their collective vagina.
This is true. The east coast bias is in full play here. The AFC East may not offer a midwest alternative (as Miami, Buffalo, NJ, and Foxboro are all near the eastern coast) and the NFC East has just one (Arlington), so why the West division has to give up any geographical advantage here is lame.

Honestly though, had the NFL set this up this way from the beginning (i.e. the initial 8-year cycle of 2002-2009), then this would all be moot.
__________________
Support ...IntheBullseye.com and follow us on Twitter
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-30-2012, 11:09 PM
WMH WMH is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,795
Default

Houston Texans (@HoustonTexans) tweeted:
Texans 2013 regular season opponents are set already: (Home) DEN, OAK, STL, SEA, NE, IND, TEN, JAX (Road) KC, SD, AZ, SF, BAL, IND, TEN, JAX
__________________
In B'OB we trust, until he pisses us off!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-31-2012, 11:35 AM
HPF Bob HPF Bob is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,149
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WMH View Post
Houston Texans (@HoustonTexans) tweeted:
Texans 2013 regular season opponents are set already: (Home) DEN, OAK, STL, SEA, NE, IND, TEN, JAX (Road) KC, SD, AZ, SF, BAL, IND, TEN, JAX
That's huge because SF is a much better road team than Seattle if you judge them on this year's results. I'm sticking with 12-4 for now.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.