IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-30-2012, 09:28 PM
HPF Bob HPF Bob is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,149
Default

Well, we won and I got about an hour's sleep. Hopefully no serious injuries although I saw Butler hurt his elbow. Cutdowns coming tomorrow.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-30-2012, 09:43 PM
WMH WMH is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,795
Default

We lost Butler with torn triceps. Done for the year......

Gonna need a swing tackle, as we are pretty slim all of a sudden.

T Rashad Butler tore his tricep and is out for the year. Kubiak: "Unfortunate. Tough deal." #Texans -- Nick Scurfield (@NickScurfield)
__________________
In B'OB we trust, until he pisses us off!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-31-2012, 07:01 AM
nunusguy nunusguy is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,399
Default

Like I said in another thread, trading Arian at his peak & most marketable this past offseason for pick(s) and/or players(s), using the cap-space to retain last years starting right side of the OLine, and making Tate the feature back would have been the way to go IMO. Forsett and rookie Grimes could have been our 2 & 3# guys - good backs are still a dime a dozen.
Local 790 radio-sports talk show guy Greg Kock, who's a former GB Packers Hall-Of-Fame offensive tackle, says that Newton got the starting job by default since Butler is so bad, and he has even an even lower evaluation of the play of starting RG Caldwell. This thing with the OLine is likely to bite us in the azz this year.
Trade deadline is into October, right ? Since we are stuck with Foster and his fat contract, do we now think about shopping Tate or another marketable player
to help our OLine or roll the dice with what we've got ?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-31-2012, 07:43 AM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nunusguy View Post
Like I said in another thread, trading Arian at his peak & most marketable this past offseason for pick(s) and/or players(s), using the cap-space to retain last years starting right side of the OLine, and making Tate the feature back would have been the way to go IMO. Forsett and rookie Grimes could have been our 2 & 3# guys - good backs are still a dime a dozen.
Local 790 radio-sports talk show guy Greg Kock, who's a former GB Packers Hall-Of-Fame offensive tackle, says that Newton got the starting job by default since Butler is so bad, and he has even an even lower evaluation of the play of starting RG Caldwell. This thing with the OLine is likely to bite us in the azz this year.
Trade deadline is into October, right ? Since we are stuck with Foster and his fat contract, do we now think about shopping Tate or another marketable player
to help our OLine or roll the dice with what we've got ?
Wow. We should have gotten rid of Foster to keep Mike Brisel and Eric Winston?

You think two cement shoed OL are irreplaceable and Arian Foster is a "system guy"?

You think Tate/Forsett are going to give our passing offense 700+ yards and multiple long passing TDs?

I don't know what dime store you shop at, but if they have RBs like Foster by the dozen I wonder why the other 31 NFL teams aren't there.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-31-2012, 09:42 AM
WMH WMH is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,795
Default

Personally, I'm quite happy to be "stuck" with Foster. Good spot to be in.

We lost a swing tackle. If things go well, Butler wouldn't have played. I don't see them trading guys that will contribute this season for someone who may, or may not play.
__________________
In B'OB we trust, until he pisses us off!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-31-2012, 11:03 AM
HPF Bob HPF Bob is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,149
Default

Because the ZBS requires a certain skill set, I would not be surprised if the Texans can find a decent replacement on the waiver wire for Butler and possibly an upgrade at RG and RT. They've already cut Studdard who could always come back in an emergency. The real question is what they do with Brooks and Jones if they are deemed "not ready" but too valuable to cut?

Incidentally, I thought the "2"s did a fine job in run blocking but looked average or worse in pass blocking last night.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-31-2012, 11:44 AM
painekiller painekiller is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Near the Galleria
Posts: 2,852
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HPF Bob View Post
Because the ZBS requires a certain skill set, I would not be surprised if the Texans can find a decent replacement on the waiver wire for Butler and possibly an upgrade at RG and RT. They've already cut Studdard who could always come back in an emergency. The real question is what they do with Brooks and Jones if they are deemed "not ready" but too valuable to cut?

Incidentally, I thought the "2"s did a fine job in run blocking but looked average or worse in pass blocking last night.
IMO Jones is ready right now to step in if your starting LG, OC, or RG goes down. Jones is looking like a great fit for this offense. Did anyone notice that Meyers had left the game in NO? I did not notice, that is how good Jones looked.
__________________
There is no failure, only feedback.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.