IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-30-2011, 04:56 AM
Arky Arky is offline
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 9,291
Default

I see the secondary shaping up pretty much like you suggest. I do believe they'll pick up a player or two in free agency (CB + S) and took Brandon Harris anyway as a good, young developemental talent - no way he's starts after last year's failed experiment. More picks coming today.....I think they (Texan braintrust) have to operate as though whenever free agency comes along, there might be a mad scramble where it's possible that they could end up out in the cold... There will be more picks coming today and I think you will see a serviceable defense that could possibly operate quite well without the benefit of free agency....

There's also (insert doomsday music) "gel time". Hate to say it but it's gonna take a whole lotta repitition/practice/live action before all the old parts and new parts work together as a team in this new 3-4..... It won't be fast enough for some people but hey, thems the breaks. If the Oilers taught me one thing, it is how to be patient..... 9, 10, 12 years? Pffft, no problem. Especially over things I have no control over...

One last thing... I'm really tired and annoyed of reading of the Watt pick as a "safe" pick. What exactly does that mean? What makes it "safe"? Safe as in "not going to bust"? Or safe as in "you-messed-up-my-mock-draft-you-spineless-weasels"? Why not call it a "good" pick? A "solid" pick? Much better terms, IMO....
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-30-2011, 05:54 AM
TheMatrix31 TheMatrix31 is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,042
Default

I'm pretty optimistic. I don't know much about college football but these guys seem like the balls-to-the-wall players we need so badly.

Keep adding, Wade. Keep adding.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-30-2011, 08:11 AM
Keith Keith is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Thanks pk for writing up the front page of the site, albeit unknowingly...

http://www.inthebullseye.com/archive/2011/20110429.html
__________________
Support ...IntheBullseye.com and follow us on Twitter
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-30-2011, 09:21 AM
popanot popanot is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,916
Default

Nice write up, PK. Now you can tell Keith were to mail the check!

As for the draft, I'm of a better mind today with what they did in Rd2. I agree that Watt gives them all kinds of flexibility on the DL and scheme wise. And if Reed can be that edge guy, they should be much improved. However, I just can't put any trust that we'll anything from Barwin, and I just hope we can find someone, whether it's Watt, Okoye, or Mitchell, who can consistently bottle up the middle.

They've definitely improved the D on paper, but still have a lot work to do to make it reality on the field.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-30-2011, 11:50 AM
HPF Bob HPF Bob is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,149
Default

I still don't see Mario as a 3-4 fit and neither does ND Kalu. He thinks Mario might be traded or he might choose to leave in free agency at the end of the season.

Of course, there is such a thing as franchising a player so I don't take the free agency threat seriously (yet) but, according to Kalu, Mario isn't happy with the 3-4 concept despite Wade's attempts to sell him on it.

With Watt and Reed, we now have a lot of positions with either depth or mismatches, depending on how you see it. Where do you put Okoye, Smith, Watt, Mario and Mitchell up front? Where do you put Ryans, Cushing, Barwin and Reed? The concept is to have a lot of moving parts but it can also mean guys playing out of position who aren't sure of their responsibilities or don't have the skill set to make it work.

And if the lockout drags on and these guys don't get the chance to practice the new defense together - whooo doggie the stench from Reliant Park will be tremendous.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-30-2011, 12:14 PM
nunusguy nunusguy is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,399
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HPF Bob View Post
I still don't see Mario as a 3-4 fit and neither does ND Kalu. He thinks Mario might be traded or he might choose to leave in free agency at the end of the season.
Are you perhaps an Elvis fan, and I'm not talking about the one buried in Memphis ?
Denver is transitioning to the 4-3 while we're transfering from the 4-3 to the 3-4. What timing and what an opportunity ?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-30-2011, 12:17 PM
Nconroe Nconroe is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lake Conroe
Posts: 2,897
Default

Yeah, I like all three picks so far, like Watts the best after sleeping on it.

I suppose we have a DT/NT concern for 1 or A gap by some, so perhaps we will see that added yet in the draft or during FA signings, whenever that is.

I have heard ND say good things about 3-4 and how Mario fits , so perhaps depends when you are listening. Whenever there are changes, takes an adjustment period. Mario will be greater than ever in 3-4 is my estimate, fwiw.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-30-2011, 01:05 PM
painekiller painekiller is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Near the Galleria
Posts: 2,852
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arky View Post
One last thing... I'm really tired and annoyed of reading of the Watt pick as a "safe" pick. What exactly does that mean? What makes it "safe"? Safe as in "not going to bust"? Or safe as in "you-messed-up-my-mock-draft-you-spineless-weasels"? Why not call it a "good" pick? A "solid" pick? Much better terms, IMO....
Safe as in not a very high chance of being a bust, or having a medical issue, or an off the field issue.

Quin has the looming brain tumor that could recur, no doctor will say he is not going to have a relapse.

Prince is a CB and we saw last year that having a rookie CB is painful in the best of cases, and they need to win now, not in 3 years.

I hope that clears up my calling Watt the safe pick. Watt is a high character guy with a high motor, he is a leader, he is a play maker and he tested off the chart. But he plays a position, 3-4 DE, that is not as highly valued as the OLB and CB, plus we already have two guys manning both starting DE spots, we don't have starters at both OLB spots and if they really moving Quin to safety then we do not appear to have the two starters at CB. So yes IMO Watt was a luxury pick, a very nice luxury that should help the team, but still a luxury.
__________________
There is no failure, only feedback.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-30-2011, 02:34 PM
Arky Arky is offline
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 9,291
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by painekiller View Post
Safe as in not a very high chance of being a bust, or having a medical issue, or an off the field issue.

Quin has the looming brain tumor that could recur, no doctor will say he is not going to have a relapse.

Prince is a CB and we saw last year that having a rookie CB is painful in the best of cases, and they need to win now, not in 3 years.

I hope that clears up my calling Watt the safe pick. Watt is a high character guy with a high motor, he is a leader, he is a play maker and he tested off the chart. But he plays a position, 3-4 DE, that is not as highly valued as the OLB and CB, plus we already have two guys manning both starting DE spots, we don't have starters at both OLB spots and if they really moving Quin to safety then we do not appear to have the two starters at CB. So yes IMO Watt was a luxury pick, a very nice luxury that should help the team, but still a luxury.
OK, I see.

I just have seen the term "safe pick" being slung around in a not so flattering way (conservative, boring) from other, uh, critics - used sort of condescendingly from those who have lost faith in the front office. And I'm not totally there, yet...

Hopefully, JJ Watt will turn into the "best" pick or a "great" pick. We shall see..
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.