IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-28-2010, 12:17 PM
coloradodude coloradodude is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 255
Default

Well, after we got lambasted, utterly dominated, by the cowboys I wanted us to lose every single game after that. The reason? A new coach.

Am I not a fan? Unfortunately, losing seasons or winning Super Bowls are the only way you get a coaching change. I want the Texans to go to the playoffs every single year but this coaching staff is not gonna get that done. Thinking bigger picture means we have to have a coaching change...and a losing season. Ugh, the worst the better because McNair seems okay with mediocrity.

BTW, this weeks game will have the flavor of a preseason game to me. 8th pick or 12th pick means nothing because boom or bust looms in the first round.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-28-2010, 01:26 PM
painekiller painekiller is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Near the Galleria
Posts: 2,852
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by coloradodude View Post
Well, after we got lambasted, utterly dominated, by the cowboys I wanted us to lose every single game after that. The reason? A new coach.

Am I not a fan? Unfortunately, losing seasons or winning Super Bowls are the only way you get a coaching change. I want the Texans to go to the playoffs every single year but this coaching staff is not gonna get that done. Thinking bigger picture means we have to have a coaching change...and a losing season. Ugh, the worst the better because McNair seems okay with mediocrity.

BTW, this weeks game will have the flavor of a preseason game to me. 8th pick or 12th pick means nothing because boom or bust looms in the first round.

In this draft the premium picks appear to be the top 5, after that there is a group of guys that can be #7 or #21 depending on each team/ internet gurus list. So if your not top 5 IMO being #8 or #12 doesn't change much. This is not a great draft for off the chart type talent, but there seems to be a large number number of good prospects.
__________________
There is no failure, only feedback.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-28-2010, 01:39 PM
WMH WMH is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,795
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by painekiller View Post
In this draft the premium picks appear to be the top 5, after that there is a group of guys that can be #7 or #21 depending on each team/ internet gurus list. So if your not top 5 IMO being #8 or #12 doesn't change much. This is not a great draft for off the chart type talent, but there seems to be a large number number of good prospects.
True, but losing might net you Patrick Peterson if we can sneak into the top 5......

I would be a non-fan for a day if that happens.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-28-2010, 05:29 PM
painekiller painekiller is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Near the Galleria
Posts: 2,852
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WMH View Post
True, but losing might net you Patrick Peterson if we can sneak into the top 5......

I would be a non-fan for a day if that happens.
Me too, I see him as the best guy in this draft who is not a QB at Stanford.
__________________
There is no failure, only feedback.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.