IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-20-2010, 06:07 PM
NBT NBT is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Texas Coast
Posts: 1,836
Default

If and & buts were candy and nuts, we would all have a very merry Christmas. I'll believe it when I see it. And I doubt very much that Cower wants to leave all his chums on the pre-game show.
__________________
NBT - Elder statesman. Wisdom comes with age - Now if i could remember what it was!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-20-2010, 06:45 PM
painekiller painekiller is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Near the Galleria
Posts: 2,852
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NBT View Post
If and & buts were candy and nuts, we would all have a very merry Christmas. I'll believe it when I see it. And I doubt very much that Cower wants to leave all his chums on the pre-game show.
Shoot, I think it's Cowher's people putting all the rumors out there that he is interested in the Texans job.
__________________
There is no failure, only feedback.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-20-2010, 06:46 PM
TexanJedi TexanJedi is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 277
Default

How does Mario, a prototypical 4-3 defensive end, fit in a 3-4? This is my biggest issue in switching schemes, not coaching just schemes since it seems what talent we do have on defense is suited for the 4-3. A defense resembling Chicago, or the Giants or Vikings (last year anyway) would do just fine. I could be wrong but someone like Cowher concerns me in this regard.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-20-2010, 07:35 PM
HPF Bob HPF Bob is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,149
Default

Which guy on the Steelers pushed for Levon Kirkland and Greg Lloyd? If that was Cowher, I have no problem giving him GM control. If it was somebody else, then I'm a little worried. There's no doubt the Steelers have been great drafters over the years and know exactly what they are looking for and seem to find them and plug them into their system. I'm jealous as hell about it, but you have to give them props for their success.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-20-2010, 09:15 PM
Fonz the Boss Fonz the Boss is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 351
Default

I've been on Kubiak's corner all year but if we can get Cowher then I'm all for it. I also have no problem switching to 3-4. Regardless of whether Mario fits or not it can't possibly get worse than this year.
__________________
Follow Fonz_The_Boss on Twitter
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-21-2010, 02:14 AM
coloradodude coloradodude is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 255
Default

That defense of ours is horrible. To be concerned what we would do with Mario "single teamed all year long" Williams is the least of our worries.

We all agree that our secondary is beyond bad. Pittsburg has always had a pretty good secondary so Cowher would understand the need for a dominant safety...we still don't get that after all these years for some reason.

But our LB's and DL are a different story. I think a defensive minded coach could coach these guys up. The defense has to average less than 20 pts a game and we have (definitely have imo) the front seven to do that.

And we need to quit discriminating against the Samoans...we need more Samoans on the defense!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-21-2010, 08:57 AM
nunusguy nunusguy is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,399
Default

I'm not that excited about Cowher. I'd really rather have a younger guy, somebody who is clearly very hungry and has some smarts. Right off hand I have no idea who that would be, but these name guys who are part celeb like Cowher or Chucky on MNF don't appeal to me that much ?
Take a look at how Shanny is doing in Washington ? There's a pretty good comparison to Cowher in several ways. How's that working out ? Right.
Actually i wouldn't mind have Shannys kid here to be the Texans HC, but that's clearly out of the question.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-21-2010, 09:45 AM
Joshua Joshua is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nunusguy View Post
Take a look at how Shanny is doing in Washington ? There's a pretty good comparison to Cowher in several ways.
Can you elaborate? Other than them both being "name" coaches, I see virtually no similarities.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-21-2010, 09:46 AM
WMH WMH is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,795
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nunusguy View Post
Actually i wouldn't mind have Shannys kid here to be the Texans HC, but that's clearly out of the question.
WOWZA!

I can't get excited about Cowher, since I honestly don't think this is in the cards for 2011 (if there is a 2011 season). I think McNair has already decided that Kubiak is coming back, and since he pays the bills......

Now, when , not if, we do the same damn thing next year, and if Cowher doesn't end up somewhere else this year.......
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-21-2010, 10:24 AM
cadams cadams is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 461
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TexanJedi View Post
How does Mario, a prototypical 4-3 defensive end, fit in a 3-4? This is my biggest issue in switching schemes, not coaching just schemes since it seems what talent we do have on defense is suited for the 4-3. A defense resembling Chicago, or the Giants or Vikings (last year anyway) would do just fine. I could be wrong but someone like Cowher concerns me in this regard.
i think mario would fit as a d-end in a 3-4 very well. he is a bill rusher and plays the run as effectively as any d-lineman in the league. he would be making a lot of money for a 3-4 d-end, but i think he would fit in well.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-21-2010, 01:30 PM
coloradodude coloradodude is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 255
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cadams View Post
he is a bill rusher and plays the run as effectively as any d-lineman in the league.

Since Mario has been in the NFL, he has been terrible against the run. However, he has the size and speed to be great...that's potential. Potential means nothing, ask David Carr.

Mario is currently great as a supporting cast member, not a difference maker. No O coordinator gameplans around him.

With the right DC/HC that could change. Personally, I don't want Cowher because I anticipate a performance like his last year in Pittsburgh, similar to what Shanihan is and will do in Washington.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-21-2010, 02:24 PM
cadams cadams is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 461
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by coloradodude View Post
Since Mario has been in the NFL, he has been terrible against the run. However, he has the size and speed to be great...that's potential. Potential means nothing, ask David Carr.

Mario is currently great as a supporting cast member, not a difference maker. No O coordinator gameplans around him.

With the right DC/HC that could change. Personally, I don't want Cowher because I anticipate a performance like his last year in Pittsburgh, similar to what Shanihan is and will do in Washington.
are you high? mario has been much better against the run that the pass over his career, and mario is the only player on the texans defense that opposing teams do actually game plan for. i am not saying mario has played up to his potential, but your comments are way off.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.