IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-16-2010, 03:53 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

How do we know a DT will be better then Cody? Or a CB better then Quinn/Molden/Reeves?

All of the guys above are far more proven then Arian Foster and yet we can't go RB because we have Foster (a guy with 2 NFL games)?

I am not saying we should go RB, I am just saying that Arian Foster should not factor at all into what we spend our first round pick on.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-16-2010, 05:07 PM
Joshua Joshua is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by barrett View Post
How do we know a DT will be better then Cody? Or a CB better then Quinn/Molden/Reeves?

All of the guys above are far more proven then Arian Foster and yet we can't go RB because we have Foster (a guy with 2 NFL games)?

I am not saying we should go RB, I am just saying that Arian Foster should not factor at all into what we spend our first round pick on.
I'm with Barrett on this one. No way we can cross RB off the list of potential first round picks merely because Foster had a couple good games at the end of the season. His one big game was against NE, who I seem to recall resting Wilfork, Warren, and several others. Even Wali Lundy had a good game or two. While you certainly hope for the best, this tiny sample size tells you nothing about what you have at RB.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.