![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Originally Posted by chuck I'm just sitting here thinking (pacing, actually) that whatever my issues with Kubiak he is apparently a goddam genius at tutoring quarterbacks. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree that Houston is a place where a late pick could flourish. I honestly feel Schaub is the most accurate passer in the NFL (or at least that him and Brady are in a league of their own). He may not be elite in arm strength, pocket presence, or ability to deal with the blitz, but his throws are more catchable and lend themselves more to YAC then any other QB in the NFL. That is the biggest reason for Owen Daniels' great success. He is a great route runner who gets open, but Schaub puts the ball in spots where Daniels can turn his 6 yard route into a 15 yard gain. Well, that and the fact that 2 players are devoted to AJ and 5 others are worried about him on every snap.
That means a great route runner with sub-par speed who is overlooked on draft day could be very productive here in the same way Anderson has been. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
But once you've re-signed Walter, you have no need to draft a WR. You're going to keep five WRs max and we have:
1) Andre Johnson 2) Kevin Walter 3) Jacoby Jones 4) Andre Davis 5) Anderson plus, we have quasi-WRs in Daniels and Casey. There's no room for another receiver so you better be drafting a WR very late or as a UDFA. Otherwise, it's a wasted pick. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I wonder how hard it would be to get a FS like Brodney Pool?
__________________
Originally Posted by chuck I'm just sitting here thinking (pacing, actually) that whatever my issues with Kubiak he is apparently a goddam genius at tutoring quarterbacks. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Texans value Walter more than the participants in this thread do because the Texans consider Walter by far the team's best blocker at the position.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() Quote:
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
NFLPA reports the base salaries for the Kevin Walter contract as follows:
2010 3,000,000 2011 3,000,000 2012 3,500,000 2013 3,500,000 2014 3,500,000 |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|