IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-08-2010, 01:24 PM
Roy P Roy P is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshua View Post
Now, the question is, does Houston, with Schaub and Johnson, offer a similar situation where a late pick could blossom?
That's my point. The answer is yes.
__________________
Originally Posted by chuck
I'm just sitting here thinking (pacing, actually) that whatever my issues with Kubiak he is apparently a goddam genius at tutoring quarterbacks.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-08-2010, 02:30 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

I agree that Houston is a place where a late pick could flourish. I honestly feel Schaub is the most accurate passer in the NFL (or at least that him and Brady are in a league of their own). He may not be elite in arm strength, pocket presence, or ability to deal with the blitz, but his throws are more catchable and lend themselves more to YAC then any other QB in the NFL. That is the biggest reason for Owen Daniels' great success. He is a great route runner who gets open, but Schaub puts the ball in spots where Daniels can turn his 6 yard route into a 15 yard gain. Well, that and the fact that 2 players are devoted to AJ and 5 others are worried about him on every snap.

That means a great route runner with sub-par speed who is overlooked on draft day could be very productive here in the same way Anderson has been.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-08-2010, 10:24 PM
HPF Bob HPF Bob is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,149
Default

But once you've re-signed Walter, you have no need to draft a WR. You're going to keep five WRs max and we have:

1) Andre Johnson
2) Kevin Walter
3) Jacoby Jones
4) Andre Davis
5) Anderson

plus, we have quasi-WRs in Daniels and Casey.

There's no room for another receiver so you better be drafting a WR very late or as a UDFA. Otherwise, it's a wasted pick.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-08-2010, 10:32 PM
Roy P Roy P is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HPF Bob View Post
But once you've re-signed Walter, you have no need to draft a WR. You're going to keep five WRs max and we have:

1) Andre Johnson
2) Kevin Walter
3) Jacoby Jones
4) Andre Davis
5) Anderson

plus, we have quasi-WRs in Daniels and Casey.

There's no room for another receiver so you better be drafting a WR very late or as a UDFA. Otherwise, it's a wasted pick.
We were discussing that since we have Walter re-signed, the draft pick that would have been used to replace him can now be used on a different position. My point was that we may have been better off signing a FA at another position that is a "hole" or a "need" and simply drafting a WR in the late rounds.

I wonder how hard it would be to get a FS like Brodney Pool?
__________________
Originally Posted by chuck
I'm just sitting here thinking (pacing, actually) that whatever my issues with Kubiak he is apparently a goddam genius at tutoring quarterbacks.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-09-2010, 02:26 PM
chuck chuck is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,845
Default

The Texans value Walter more than the participants in this thread do because the Texans consider Walter by far the team's best blocker at the position.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-09-2010, 08:56 PM
Keith Keith is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck View Post
The Texans value Walter more than the participants in this thread do because the Texans consider Walter by far the team's best blocker at the position.
They could also be reading Jacoby's tweets this offseason too.
Quote:
jacoby_jones12
im n da strip club...bored....miss houston...but i love my city
http://twitter.com/jacoby_jones12/status/10209531048
__________________
Support ...IntheBullseye.com and follow us on Twitter
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-02-2010, 11:03 PM
Keith Keith is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

NFLPA reports the base salaries for the Kevin Walter contract as follows:

2010 3,000,000
2011 3,000,000
2012 3,500,000
2013 3,500,000
2014 3,500,000
__________________
Support ...IntheBullseye.com and follow us on Twitter
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.