IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The NFL Draft
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-18-2010, 07:39 AM
nunusguy nunusguy is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,399
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roy P View Post
Getting Antoine Caldwell in the 3rd round last year showed me how hard it is going to be to get a rookie on the OL unless he's a 1st round draft pick.
You're gonna need to get real and prioritize your wish list since you've got the Mizzou backer and an interior OLineman both as you're first round pick and last time I checked we've only got one pick in the top round ?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-18-2010, 10:21 AM
Roy P Roy P is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nunusguy View Post
You're gonna need to get real and prioritize your wish list since you've got the Mizzou backer and an interior OLineman both as you're first round pick and last time I checked we've only got one pick in the top round ?
My wish list is prioritized, take a look at the thread called "My Guys". I don't really say that I have to have an OL in the first round. In fact, I won't ever box myself in and say that a particular position has to be drafted in a particular round. It is always BPA. Currently, I think the BPA when we pick will be Weatherspoon, but that's not a certainty.
__________________
Originally Posted by chuck
I'm just sitting here thinking (pacing, actually) that whatever my issues with Kubiak he is apparently a goddam genius at tutoring quarterbacks.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-18-2010, 12:45 PM
HPF Bob HPF Bob is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,149
Default

I'd leave the d-line alone. We've obviously thrown enough resources at it and it is no longer a liability. If Eyechart decides to retire, we can find somebody on the waiver wire.

The o-line needs work but I'd like to give Coleman a chance. If we used a 2nd or 3rd on a guard, I'd be okay with that.

IMO, the secondary needs fixing and another RB would be a good pickup. That's where I'd spend the resources.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-18-2010, 06:26 PM
NBT NBT is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Texas Coast
Posts: 1,836
Default

We definitely improved the secondary and the LB corp in the last draft, yet we still ended up like 17th in defense. An improvement, to be sure, over years past, but it won't get us into the playoffs. So that leaves the DL, or the coaches for same as the prime culprits. I would have to argue with Bob in saying the DL does not need any help. I think the DL is THE place where we need to beef-up. Matter of fact I would use our #1 pick if a suitable DT were still there at #20. I realize that is unlikely to happen, so I would use either a second or third on it. On offense I see OG/C & RB as the prime targets.
__________________
NBT - Elder statesman. Wisdom comes with age - Now if i could remember what it was!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-18-2010, 08:41 PM
Roy P Roy P is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HPF Bob View Post
The o-line needs work but I'd like to give Coleman a chance.
I'll bite, who is Coleman and why are you giving him a chance?
__________________
Originally Posted by chuck
I'm just sitting here thinking (pacing, actually) that whatever my issues with Kubiak he is apparently a goddam genius at tutoring quarterbacks.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-18-2010, 11:22 PM
cland cland is offline
Veteran Depth
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 132
Default

I think Bob meant, Caldwell. I know most of us are big fans of this style anyways, but more than any other year this seems to be the year to trade down Cleveland Browns style (#5 pick turned into slew of picks, players, and a center at pick #21)

The reason is that we have needs that are much better addressed in rounds 2 and 3. Guards, Centers, Run-stopping 4-3 NTs, Safeties, and RBs. Unless a CB that sits atop our board falls, I'm all for getting multiple picks in those rounds.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-19-2010, 01:49 AM
sinnister sinnister is offline
Veteran Depth
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Shreveport, La
Posts: 165
Default

I am probably going to state something that most everyone will disagree with, but I would love to see us trade up and draft Eric Berry. Adding an Elite safety would instantly make the secondary better, and could take the defense to the next level. With that being said, if we were to trade down and pick up picks, I want complain. There are several players I have been watching that could be had, and would add needed depth or playmakers. Still, if he puts up the numbers that I think he will at the combine, and he is potentially in the Ed Reed mold, I would love an Eric Berry pick. If I am betting, no way we would do it.

If we want do that, then for God sakes add some muscle to the interior line!! I am scared of drafting a DLinemen in the first round, but I could live with an OLineman in the first or second. As long as we can find an elite safety, or fairly elite......heck, as long as Busing isn't on the field......maybe on the team, I can live with that. I won't even start my Chris Brown rant.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-19-2010, 02:10 PM
NBT NBT is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Texas Coast
Posts: 1,836
Default

I don't necessarily see it that way. Eugene Wilson is signed for 2 more years, and if he comes back 100% from his injury, I don't see that big a need at safety after the play we got from Pollard. If I draft for the secondary early it would be for CB, assuming dRob will be gone. Also I would like to see if Molden can live up to his potential and get off the training table this year.
__________________
NBT - Elder statesman. Wisdom comes with age - Now if i could remember what it was!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.