IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #12  
Old 12-16-2009, 04:00 PM
Arky Arky is offline
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 9,291
Default

OK, I guess no more feedback.

My own list is something like what Mike and PK offered. I might include Molden (if he ever gets healthy) and Dreesen for his long snapping skills + backup TE. There are players like Jeremiah Johnson on IR who we haven't really had a look at yet to consider, also.

So, if we go by that, Mike had 18 names. PK had 18 names. I have no debate with the players listed from those two lists. My own list would be about the same maybe +2 more. So, let's call all these guys "keepers". Then, out of a 53 man roster, we have approx. 18-20 keepers. Then that would leave about 33 JAG's (just a guy).

Now, I understand you can't have pro-bowlers at every position but I still see lots of room for improvement and depth with these Texans... While we've got some outright stars and solid, dependable players at some positions, there are areas where the team is still kinda weak, IMO....

Kubiak is in a no-win situation here: If you think he has plenty of talent, then you might think why isn't he getting the most out of it? If you think he has a dearth of talent, then you might think "dang, you've had 4 years, bud".

Statistically, this might turn out to be the best Texan team ever (offensively and defensively) on paper. Unfortunately, it hasn't yet translated to the most important stat of all, W's and L's.....
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.