IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-11-2009, 06:41 PM
Big Texas Big Texas is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,469
Default

So far what have Casey and Hill done?

Exactly

I am starting to think they picked up Casey because they are not going to extend OD's contract; and Hill because they needed a blocking TE.

They better not.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-11-2009, 06:47 PM
chuck chuck is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,845
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Texas View Post
I am starting to think they picked up Casey because they are not going to extend OD's contract; and Hill because they needed a blocking TE.
At the very least they have leverage with OD that they didn't have before drafting Casey.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-11-2009, 07:03 PM
Big Texas Big Texas is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,469
Default

Forget that. Daniels is a probowler. You drop one of these other scrubs before you let him get away.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-11-2009, 07:30 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Leverage or a 4th round RB to try to score on the goalline?

Leverage or a Safety who can tackle?

4 TEs is pointless. A terrible waste of resources on a position where our 2 deep was already set while we ignored spots where we had great need.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-11-2009, 08:05 PM
chuck chuck is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,845
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by barrett View Post
Leverage or a 4th round RB to try to score on the goalline?

Leverage or a Safety who can tackle?

4 TEs is pointless. A terrible waste of resources on a position where our 2 deep was already set while we ignored spots where we had great need.
Don't look at me, dude, I'm not the one in the war room making the decisions. They drafted two more TEs in April. I didn't tell them to. It was obvious to me that they hoped Casey would be a Daniels clone and would give them leverage with OD next year. Hey, maybe I'm wrong. Maybe the Texans just like having four TEs on the team, who knows.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-11-2009, 08:46 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck View Post
Don't look at me, dude, I'm not the one in the war room making the decisions. They drafted two more TEs in April. I didn't tell them to. It was obvious to me that they hoped Casey would be a Daniels clone and would give them leverage with OD next year. Hey, maybe I'm wrong. Maybe the Texans just like having four TEs on the team, who knows.
I'm not blaming you. I think you are right. I think the pick was made with an eye toward the Daniels negotiations. I just think it was stupid and wasteful. Especially with Hill in the prior round.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-12-2009, 10:19 AM
Joshua Joshua is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 549
Default

First off, I will acknowledge that I'm pretty much done with Kubiak and have zero confidence that he's the guy to take us to the next level. He's had 4 years to do it and this team has many of the same issues which have plagued it from day one of his tenure. As this is an accountability thread, I thought this is as good a place as any to discuss what Kubiak has accomplished (or not) during his time here.

First the positive, Kubiak has installed a pretty good offense. However, I think our No. 3 ranking last year was somewhat misleading. Our short yardage struggles are no surprise. They have been an ongoing problem for years. While I don't have the stats, my guess is that we are one of the worst short yardage teams in the league. If anyone has the stats, I would be interested to see them. What did surprise me last year was how bad we were in 3rd and long as well. It was about week 10 or 11 when they showed a stat during the Texans game that we were 0-37 in 3rd and 8 or longer. I couldn't believe that. We hadn't converted a single time in 10 weeks? What these two things tell me is that the offense achieves most of its successes off of misdirection and unpredictability. While this is not that unusual in and of itself, at some point, you have to be able to beat the other team even when they know what's coming. Not only have we not been able to do that, but we are truly terrible at it. I don't think you can consistently win until you can do so. I think this also goes a long way toward explaining our redzone woes.

Now the negative. My primary complaint is his steadfast refusal to address the obvious deficiencies on this team. Just to quickly name a few, we have lacked a safety, DT, interior linemen, and back-up RB for years. While I know you can't address all of these overnight, his stubborness on these fronts is stupefying. Seeing teams like Denver and New Orleans (who had 2 of the worst defenses last year) go get Brian Dawkins and Darren Sharper and instantly upgrade the play and mentality of their D drives me nuts. Throw on top of it that both teams went out and actually interviewed proven D coordinators is the icing on the cake. As for a DT, nothing singlehandedly disrupts our offense like a mauling, run-stuffing DT. Kris Jenkins, Ngata, Hampton, etc. all wreck shop when they play us. You would think seeing this firsthand might tip Kubiak off that having a guy like that would be beneficial. Apparently not.

Next, his refusal to even interview, much less hire, someone he's not already friends with is irritating and makes me question his competency. While I realize this sort of thing is common in the NFL, he is dramatically reducing the hiring pool and this invariably will have a detrimental impact. By refusing to even consider other qualified coaches, he is doing the Texans no favors and, quite frankly, abdicating his job responsibilities.

Finally (although I could go on), he clearly doesn't have any idea what he wants to do on defense. We have been cellar dwellers his entire time here and I don't think he has any idea how to change it. Basically, I think they are just running guys out there and hoping they play well, but don't have any real plan. We've started about 5 safeties in 5 weeks. We continually trot out other D linemen as well. One week a guy starts, the next, he's may not even be activated. That tells me they really don't know what they have and are essentially grasping at straws. Good teams don't do this. They know what they expect of their players and try and find guys who can do it.

In short, I don't think Kubiak has much to show for his time here other than a pretty good offense, but one that struggles when they lack the element of surprise. The defense has been an unmitigated disaster for which there doesn't appear to be any cohesive plan to correct. His reliance on his buddies has further retarded this team's development and has prevented this team from pursuing potentially better options. Finally, he seems to truly lack an appreciation for the team's flaws and then excerbates these by routinely placing the game in the hands of our least competent.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.