IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-01-2009, 02:29 PM
kravix kravix is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 285
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nero THE zero View Post
The Jets are also in the market for a #2 WR, FWIW.

I wouldn't be opposed to moving Walter if the return was decent enough. He's in the final year of his contract and I don't think he will be re-signed; if you could get something for him now, I think I'd do it.
I believe the complete opposite. Unless another team offers him number one money, which i doubt, I expect to see him back here. We may even pay him slightly better than the average number 2 WR to keep him.

Walter is better in run blocking than any other WR on this roster, Davis/Anderson/Jacoby cannot do what he does. Kubiak want to run the ball and run it good, a team would have to offer alot to get the texans to let him go, more than i think any team is willing to give for him.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-01-2009, 06:55 PM
NBT NBT is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Texas Coast
Posts: 1,836
Default

Walter has a tweaked hammy, so he's not going anywhere right now. Even so, why trade him? Unless we could get a proven Dlineman (and that probably won't happen), I think it would be foolish to let him go.
__________________
NBT - Elder statesman. Wisdom comes with age - Now if i could remember what it was!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-01-2009, 08:07 PM
painekiller painekiller is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Near the Galleria
Posts: 2,852
Default

from the offcial site.

Quote:
They let go of cornerbacks David Pittman and Cletis Gordon and two undrafted rookies, tackle Jason Watkins and receiver Mike Jones.
I did not get any of them correct, in fact I thought Pittman had look OK.

And now does my rant about the signing of Gordon make more sense? He is here less than a few days and he does not have a fair shot at learning the play book, and then he is cut. WOW that is spending your time wisely.
__________________
There is no failure, only feedback.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-02-2009, 12:50 AM
kravix kravix is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 285
Default

Besides the head scratcher with Gordon, no real suprises.

I do find it odd that Richardson and Parson lasted one more cut than Pittman. I am not sure if Pittman has any PS eligibility and its possible the team is giving him a chance to find another home sooner rather than later.

The UDFA's had no real shot here with the depth at those positions.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.