IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-17-2009, 01:44 PM
Arky Arky is offline
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 9,291
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by coloradodude View Post
Did we try to run any version of the sweep? If so, how'd we do?
There was a play where Moats ran for about 12 yards and got knocked out of bounds refusing to go down after several hits.

Moats, IMO, is a very good RB if utilized properly. I think he could handle 6-8 quality carries/game and give max effort to take the load off Slaton and Brown. More carries than that, I think you get diminishing returns.... Moats' problem is that he's physically a Slaton copy. Sort of "Slaton Lite".

I think the Texans really need to keep 4 RB's on the 53-man roster due to Brown's track record. Slaton, Brown, Moats and Foster. Casey could be the emergency back-up for Leech....
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-17-2009, 03:34 PM
papabear papabear is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 838
Default

-I saw Caldwell make a a couple of nice cut blocks

-Run Blocking was VERY sloppy on that first series. I know someone thought Slaton looked sluggish, but to me he didn't have anything to work with. On one play Brown (who looked good otherwise) completely wiffed and a LB came unblocked to meet Slaton in the backfield. The key for running backs is slow to, and then fast through the hole...that can't happen if the O-line is getting pushed into the backfield or letting guys come completely free at the RB. Slaton runs much tougher than I ever would have thought, but he is what he is. Which is fine with me.

-Studdard is much improved since last year. Not a pro bowler, or even starter, by any means, but he has shown improvement.

-Barwin is getting some good experience,and you can see why he has so many people excited. (He's already proven himself in the new Madden ). He left the chiefs starting LT in the dust on that sack. If I remember correctly Albert was a guy that plenty of people around here wanted.

-Okam had some really nice moments. He might be a guy that can only handle 10-15 snaps a game...but he could huge force in those plays.

-Okoye got some good penetration at times. No sacks or even really heavy pressure....but enough to keep the QB from being to step up in the pocket away from Mario. Which is all you really need.

-I've heard conflicting theories on the sack Schaub took. Wrong protection was called(White's fault), Slaton missed his assignemnet, and that Schaub was waiting for DA to break off his route like he was supposed to.. Could be some truth to all three, but the angry little cherokee will get it straightened out. Other than that I thought the pass blocking looked fine.

-Pre-season football is sloppy. I should know that, but for some reason I'm shocked every year at how much different it is in the pre-season. It is what it is and I still don't have a solid grasp on what this team is going to look like this year.
__________________
"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-BobMcNair
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-17-2009, 06:12 PM
NBT NBT is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Texas Coast
Posts: 1,836
Default

Pretty good assesments from all of you. CB Matteral Richardson has to go, prefferably this week. I was impressed with CB's Glover (with a hard O) Quin, and McCain. You can see coach Gibbs stamp on the secondary already - much better.
__________________
NBT - Elder statesman. Wisdom comes with age - Now if i could remember what it was!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.