![]() |
|
View Poll Results: Sign Vick for the Minimum for 2 years? | |||
Yes please. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 8.33% |
No thanks. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
22 | 91.67% |
Voters: 24. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've gotta say "pass" on this one. I absolutely think he should have another shot at the NFL, and I think this conditional reinstatement is the best thing for him. He certainly won't be up to speed by week 1, and not allowing him back till week 6 gives him and whatever team signs him a built-in excuse for sub-par play. Methinks Miami is his best fit, since he's a wildcat-running OC's wet dream, though I think that is a bit of a long shot, especially since they just invested a 2nd round pick in pat white, who I like a whole helluva lot.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Me personally, I like the guy's skill set. An analyst from nfl network (the name escapes me) puts it best to me. When Vick was in the league, concerning athleticism only, Vick was 10 steps ahead of everyone else. If he comes back even half that he is still a threat for any team.
However, we had the third best offense last season. Our interest now is on defense. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|