IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-13-2009, 10:02 PM
Nconroe Nconroe is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lake Conroe
Posts: 2,897
Default

Is it quieter this year in Texans news than past couple years, or am I just more impatient this year? maybe it will start this week going by the signing history you gave.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-13-2009, 11:04 PM
painekiller painekiller is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Near the Galleria
Posts: 2,852
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nconroe View Post
Is it quieter this year in Texans news than past couple years, or am I just more impatient this year? maybe it will start this week going by the signing history you gave.
Last year we started camp on the 25th, this year not until the 31st, I am sure this has a little to do with our impatience.

If you look it seems that most guys are signed during the last 7 days before camp starts.
__________________
There is no failure, only feedback.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-14-2009, 07:35 AM
nunusguy nunusguy is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,399
Default

But to complicate the rookie signing process the Texans obviously have other considerations this year they haven't had in the past with the ongoing contract negotiations involving key veterans DeMeco & OD and the whole D-Rob drama. Smith and staff only have so much time in each day and these
other situations may delay the completion of signing all rookies in 2009, especially by the beginning of TC ?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-15-2009, 12:21 PM
NBT NBT is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Texas Coast
Posts: 1,836
Default

I wish they would hurry up and sign the rest of the draftees. But I know it will be the last week before TC before it finally heats up and comes to a boil.
__________________
NBT - Elder statesman. Wisdom comes with age - Now if i could remember what it was!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-15-2009, 01:14 PM
nunusguy nunusguy is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,399
Default

I realize these contracts have many parameters and to a degree all are
unigue in certain aspects, but on the other hand there's got to be a certain
degree of standarization for many of the terms. I guess I dunno why it takes
so long ? I mean once there's an agreement in priciple about the basic terms, does it still take that long to dot the "is" and cross the "ts" ?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-15-2009, 02:06 PM
Joshua Joshua is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nunusguy View Post
I realize these contracts have many parameters and to a degree all are
unigue in certain aspects, but on the other hand there's got to be a certain
degree of standarization for many of the terms. I guess I dunno why it takes
so long ? I mean once there's an agreement in priciple about the basic terms, does it still take that long to dot the "is" and cross the "ts" ?
I wonder if this is precisely why the deals are put off until just before training camp. If the team knows that they can reach a deal pretty easily when necessary, seems it would make sense to let McNair keep his signing bonus money for as long as possible. Also, I don't know the answer to this, but there may be some concerns about having guys get injured while under contract. For example, assume a 3rd round pick signs in late May. Does anyone know whether he would be entitled to any different compensation if he were to blow his knee out while, say, training on his own than if he wasn't signed?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-15-2009, 03:35 PM
painekiller painekiller is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Near the Galleria
Posts: 2,852
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshua View Post
I wonder if this is precisely why the deals are put off until just before training camp. If the team knows that they can reach a deal pretty easily when necessary, seems it would make sense to let McNair keep his signing bonus money for as long as possible. Also, I don't know the answer to this, but there may be some concerns about having guys get injured while under contract. For example, assume a 3rd round pick signs in late May. Does anyone know whether he would be entitled to any different compensation if he were to blow his knee out while, say, training on his own than if he wasn't signed?
That what I was thinking was the cause for the late date. This way no late minute injury or mishap with the law get in the way of the player completing the contract.
__________________
There is no failure, only feedback.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-15-2009, 04:23 PM
Keith Keith is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshua View Post
I wonder if this is precisely why the deals are put off until just before training camp. If the team knows that they can reach a deal pretty easily when necessary, seems it would make sense to let McNair keep his signing bonus money for as long as possible. Also, I don't know the answer to this, but there may be some concerns about having guys get injured while under contract. For example, assume a 3rd round pick signs in late May. Does anyone know whether he would be entitled to any different compensation if he were to blow his knee out while, say, training on his own than if he wasn't signed?
Yep, this is what my answer would be.

As for injury pay... those are gray-ish scenarios. Iirc there is boiler-plate type language in contracts that talks about non-football injuries. These come up from time to time, like when a player blows out a knee playing beach games (Robert Edwards) or riding motorcycles (The Chosen One).

In the case of Edwards, I don't think the Pats owed him anything. Even though the injury occured in an NFL properties sponsored event, Edwards signed some waiver. As for K2, the Browns had special language in the contract against high-risk activities, so I think they were in a position where they could call for a breach of contract and recoup prorated bonus money. Instead, I think they just used it as leverage to renegotiate the contract to make it more incentive-based.
__________________
Support ...IntheBullseye.com and follow us on Twitter
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.