IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-08-2009, 07:46 PM
cland cland is offline
Veteran Depth
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 132
Default

Quote:
The only starting lineup battle I care much about is at WLB, and that is because backup LBs get almost no playing time outside of special teams (opposed to the rotations that are used at almost every other spot). It seems like we have a bunch of guys who are quality depth but no solid NFL starter at the WLB. Hopefully one of them really steps up.
I actually feel pretty comfortable with the winner of the Adibi, Diles, and June battle at the WLB spot. Safety still has me worried, but not as much as prior years.

I really think it's about how our DT's turn out, and I'm very interested in seeing how Okoye in year 3 and Okam in year 2 turn out. T. Johnson can hold ground, but he's not going to change the game. Smith's pass rush at DT in the nickle package, will also impact how our D is schemed against.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-08-2009, 10:16 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cland View Post
I actually feel pretty comfortable with the winner of the Adibi, Diles, and June battle at the WLB spot. Safety still has me worried, but not as much as prior years.

I really think it's about how our DT's turn out, and I'm very interested in seeing how Okoye in year 3 and Okam in year 2 turn out. T. Johnson can hold ground, but he's not going to change the game. Smith's pass rush at DT in the nickle package, will also impact how our D is schemed against.
I agree that DT is more important for how we play this year, but who starts there isn't that important. At least 4 DTs will play and at least 1 DE will see time there as well. So which 2 get to start doesn't matter a ton since they all need to play well for us.

At LB, your starters play almost all of the snaps, and when they come off the field it is for a DB not for the backup. Because of this it is probably the most interesting position battle.

At Safety I just don't think we have enough talent to even call it a position battle. Someone is going to be put there and asked to not lose games. We are obviously going with the model that pass rush = pass defense. If we can rush the passer well, that should be fine. The problem is we haven't yet.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-08-2009, 11:08 PM
painekiller painekiller is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Near the Galleria
Posts: 2,852
Default

As barrett points out at some positions the starter is not as important.

RB is one of those, well at least the ways Kubiak has used the position in the past. We all believe Slaton will be the feature back, I am hoping that Foster wins the short yardage/big back job. I think Brown has the inside track, but I want young hungry blood with something to prove playing.

Slaton, Moats, Foster. (PS) Jeremiah Johnson
__________________
There is no failure, only feedback.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-09-2009, 12:08 AM
painekiller painekiller is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Near the Galleria
Posts: 2,852
Default

OK a lot of us think Caldwell should start, but has anyone but me looked at the OL depth? We have no one at OT after the top 3 guys. And if Caldwell starts our game day depth is hammered in the middle.


I can already see next years want list including a depth level guard and tackle
__________________
There is no failure, only feedback.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-09-2009, 01:14 AM
Arky Arky is offline
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 9,291
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by painekiller View Post
I can already see next years want list including a depth level guard and tackle
Have you seen the roster lately? There are some interesting UDFA's and FA's I didn't know they (the Texans) picked up - some from big name schools.... Tackles from Florida and Michigan, a center from LSU, guards from Kansas and Notre Dame..... I didn't know they had these guys...

Last edited by Arky; 07-09-2009 at 01:46 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-09-2009, 10:37 AM
papabear papabear is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 838
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by painekiller View Post
OK a lot of us think Caldwell should start, but has anyone but me looked at the OL depth? We have no one at OT after the top 3 guys. And if Caldwell starts our game day depth is hammered in the middle.


I can already see next years want list including a depth level guard and tackle
Most teams are only going to have three OT's active on game day. Now if one of ours gets hurt we will be pretty thin, but I feel really good about our top three tackles. We would be a little thin at gaurd or Center if Caldwell started, depending on who he beat out, but we don't know who might surprise us in camp. I'm not a real big fan of keeping a better player on the sidelines just to make our depth chart look better though. If he beats someone out then so be it.

Myers is just a center, but didn't Briesel work at center before?
__________________
"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-BobMcNair
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-09-2009, 10:52 AM
cland cland is offline
Veteran Depth
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 132
Default

I agree, Caldwell starting doesn't prevent him from sliding over to guard to cover for an injury, with Myers coming up to play center.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-09-2009, 12:29 PM
idymoe idymoe is offline
Veteran Depth
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 158
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by papabear View Post
Myers is just a center, but didn't Briesel work at center before?


Myers started the first 5 games at left guard for Denver in 2007. He moved to start at center for the last 11 games. If Caldwell starts at center, I think that makes our backup for guard/center in Myers better than what we had last year. Having to replace Ephraim at swing tackle is a bigger issue at this point. Butler may be better than Ephraim at backing up both tackles, then we need to replace Butler in the 2nd backup spot from last year.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-09-2009, 02:43 PM
papabear papabear is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 838
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by idymoe View Post
Myers started the first 5 games at left guard for Denver in 2007. He moved to start at center for the last 11 games. If Caldwell starts at center, I think that makes our backup for guard/center in Myers better than what we had last year. Having to replace Ephraim at swing tackle is a bigger issue at this point. Butler may be better than Ephraim at backing up both tackles, then we need to replace Butler in the 2nd backup spot from last year.

I don't see Myers as a gaurd even though I'm sure he could play there. He's slightly undersized as a center. It's even worse at Gaurd.
__________________
"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-BobMcNair
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.