Charles Spencer Done?

[NBT]

I think we all like and root for Spencer. The only thing I can see holding him back is his 343 lbs. of weight. If he could get it down to 318 or so, I think it would lessen the pressure on that knee. But that's just me.

[KJ3]

Originally Posted by NBT

I think we all like and root for Spencer. The only thing I can see holding him back is his 343 lbs. of weight. If he could get it down to 318 or so, I think it would lessen the pressure on that knee. But that's just me.

who are you to point the finger at gravity?!?! hahahaha

i can't help but think 25 pounds lost would make it easier to move around too. hard to lose weight in his situation though, it's not like he can just train really hard...

[NBT]

Still, it just seems to me that Spencer is getting the fickle finger. first he got a freak injury to that knee, then it has taken 2 plus years for the cartilege (which is the problem, not the muscle) to grow back, now the Texans are going full bore on the ZBS, which puts emphasis on quickness, not necessarily bull strength. All of which makes Spencer the odd man out. Shame!

[KJ3]

Originally Posted by NBT

Still, it just seems to me that Spencer is getting the fickle finger. first he got a freak injury to that knee, then it has taken 2 plus years for the cartilege (which is the problem, not the muscle) to grow back, now the Texans are going full bore on the ZBS, which puts emphasis on quickness, not necessarily bull strength. All of which makes Spencer the odd man out. Shame!

hell with 25 pounds then, try 50. 50 in 2 years (or 3 ) isn't out of the realm of possibility. i know certain frames grow into certain weight ranges but i think the closer he gets to 300 the better it will suit him on multiple fronts.

quick ZBS question- position-wise, do tackles need to be the ones who can book it? or is it guards? or centers? or all, or sides, or combo? i assume that centers don't really need quite the mobility that the rest of the line needs due to placement in the line and the farther from center the more mobility is necessary...is that right or am i off?

if kubiak is willing to give spencer another year then so am i. he never gave spencer a prediction any less gleaming than "will be a tackle in this league for many years" and if he still sees that, even if he has to come back as a guard or center or goalline fullback then it will be worth it. but i'm not the one signing his check so.....

[Bigtinylittle]

The way I see it, the only downside to putting Spencer on IR instead of cutting him is having to pay his salary, which is 445,000 for this year. Besides, if we cut him, I think we would have to give him an injury settlement anyway. I'm not sure if the settlement counts against the cap, but if it does, then if we cut him we probably aren't saving anything or very little.
I started suspecting a while back that Spencer knows he isn't going to be able to come back and is just stretching things out to max his dollars. Even if he is, though, I really don't have a problem with that. With all the money being thrown around in the league to guys who never have worked hard and guys who have never shown anything on the field, I'm not going to begrudge the relatively small amount Spencer will cost this year if he goes to IR. It's not going to make or break us.

All that being said, I hope I am very wrong and he makes it back to the form he showed two years ago.

[papabear]

Originally Posted by KJ3

quick ZBS question- position-wise, do tackles need to be the ones who can book it? or is it guards? or centers? or all, or sides, or combo? i assume that centers don't really need quite the mobility that the rest of the line needs due to placement in the line and the farther from center the more mobility is necessary...is that right or am i off?

MY opinion is that they all need to be able to move together. If one lineman is moving much quicker than the guy next to him the whole zone concept breaks down.

Maybe the Tackles need to be an extra step quicker for the outside zone runs, but really I always understood that it was about moving together in unison.

[KJ3]

Originally Posted by papabear

MY opinion is that they all need to be able to move together. If one lineman is moving much quicker than the guy next to him the whole zone concept breaks down.

Maybe the Tackles need to be an extra step quicker for the outside zone runs, but really I always understood that it was about moving together in unison.

that's kind of what i was thinking, i'll bet the tackles are just a bit quicker than the guards. maybe big spence can regain enough speed/lose enough weight to play guard or even center. i know i'd be less worried about haynesworth with spencer in his way, although i'd be as far away from that sumo match as i possibly could be...

[NBT]

Yes BUT.......the smaller linemen are usually quicker off the ball. It takes the behemoths like Spencer just a shade more time to get that bulk moving, so it is going to be harder to be "in unison". Of course Spencer had unusual quickness for a big man before he was hurt. The problem is going to be getting that quickness back, even if he does get the weight down. I hope for his sake he can get it done, but you have to have your doubts.

[painekiller]

Originally Posted by KJ3

that's kind of what i was thinking, i'll bet the tackles are just a bit quicker than the guards. maybe big spence can regain enough speed/lose enough weight to play guard or even center. i know i'd be less worried about haynesworth with spencer in his way, although i'd be as far away from that sumo match as i possibly could be...

In my understanding of the scheme, the guards and centers need to be the quickest in regard to what most teams look for. The tackles are quicker then the average OT in the league, but not as quick as the guards need to be. I have linked to a great video of the blocking scheme.

The Center and guards are expected to get out in front of the Lbs at the 2nd level.