IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The NFL Draft
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-26-2009, 03:03 PM
jppaul jppaul is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 343
Default

I love this pick. I think Daniels is safe, and Casey is not meant as a replacement, but I think he is meant to compete with Joel Dreesen.

I expect we will keep 4 TEs. Daniels, Hill, LS/TE whatever his name is, and either Dreesen or Casey.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-26-2009, 03:09 PM
Keith Keith is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jppaul View Post
I expect we will keep 4 TEs. Daniels, Hill, LS/TE whatever his name is, and either Dreesen or Casey.
Clark Harris? Anyone know if Antione Caldwell can be the long snapper?

And I can't imagine a scenario outside of a trade where both Dreesen and Casey aren't on the roster. Dreesen just signed a three-year contract this offseason - as an RFA! And Casey is now the 5th round pick. He needs to make the team.

Daniels has a LOT of trade value. No doubt. But he also has a LOT of actual value ...to guys like Matt Schaub, Baby Shan, etc. Interesting pick. Casey is a terrific fit for the offense. Terrific fit.
__________________
Support ...IntheBullseye.com and follow us on Twitter
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-26-2009, 03:29 PM
Rum Runner Rum Runner is offline
Training Camp Fodder
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 16
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith View Post
Clark Harris? Anyone know if Antione Caldwell can be the long snapper?
Doesn't Dressen have some long snapping experience?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-26-2009, 03:39 PM
dadmg dadmg is offline
Veteran Depth
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Spearfish, SD
Posts: 203
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rum Runner View Post
Doesn't Dressen have some long snapping experience?
You are correct, good sir.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-26-2009, 03:42 PM
dadmg dadmg is offline
Veteran Depth
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Spearfish, SD
Posts: 203
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith View Post
Interesting pick. Casey is a terrific fit for the offense. Terrific fit.
I agree. Actually brings back memories of when I first heard the Texans took Owen Daniels. Scouting report's pretty similar, although I think Casey will need at least a year of apprenticing in a pro-style offense. Good fit.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-26-2009, 03:46 PM
Mike Mike is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 512
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith View Post
Clark Harris? Anyone know if Antione Caldwell can be the long snapper?

And I can't imagine a scenario outside of a trade where both Dreesen and Casey aren't on the roster. Dreesen just signed a three-year contract this offseason - as an RFA! And Casey is now the 5th round pick. He needs to make the team.

Daniels has a LOT of trade value. No doubt. But he also has a LOT of actual value ...to guys like Matt Schaub, Baby Shan, etc. Interesting pick. Casey is a terrific fit for the offense. Terrific fit.
The Texans had Casey snapping during a workout. That is a hard skill, but if he can snap effectively, then we don't only carry a guy whose sole job is to snap. I think Casey can be a versatile player. I wonder if there is some Wildcat in our future?
__________________
Even though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I fear no evil, for You are with me; Your rod and Your staff, they comfort me. PS 23:4
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-26-2009, 04:07 PM
Warren Warren is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 623
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike View Post
I think Casey can be a versatile player. I wonder if there is some Wildcat in our future?
He could also see some time at FB -- John McClain commented on the radio the other day that some teams were looking at Casey more as a FB than a TE. He did have about 100 rushing attempts at Rice. I'd love to see some Wildcat.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-26-2009, 07:06 PM
edo783 edo783 is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Tomball
Posts: 313
Default

One TE is the blocking guy we have needed in short yardage situations and the other guy is an H-back, long snapper guy. IMO, the only TE that needs to worry is Dreesen as he is pretty much the same guy as OD, but a bit slower.
__________________
Old age just comes at a real bad time.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-26-2009, 07:20 PM
TexanJedi TexanJedi is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by edo783 View Post
One TE is the blocking guy we have needed in short yardage situations and the other guy is an H-back, long snapper guy. IMO, the only TE that needs to worry is Dreesen as he is pretty much the same guy as OD, but a bit slower.
I think you've got it right. Anyone want to trade a big back for Dreesen? (didn't think so)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-27-2009, 12:52 AM
kravix kravix is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 285
Default

He is so versitile it is crazy.. But back to back TE's? I didnt think Dresson was that bad, and I think Casey has a better shot at the team that Dresson does. This kid could be an ace in the hole to keep defences on their toes. He could also go along way towards seeing more double TE sets like the kid before him.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.