![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In the offseason the Front office saw fit to go forward with Garbage at Safety and nothing behind Slaton at RB. Not one of our 8(?) draft picks or a single free agent dollar went to improve two holes that appeared gaping to everyone but Smith and Kubiak. Now with our back end keying a terrible defensive effort in the first 3 weeks and our inability to covert a 3rd/4th and 1 costing us all season, I say our 2-3 record falls squarely on the shoulders of Kubiak and Smith.
But on the bright side we have four good TEs for an offense that is at it's best in 3 and 4 wide sets. I hope whoever replaces Kubiak has personell say. Smith and the front office are a good pro and college scouts but appears to have no plan or vision for what he wants the team to be. Let someone with a plan tell him what to do and he should be good at doing it. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So far what have Casey and Hill done?
Exactly I am starting to think they picked up Casey because they are not going to extend OD's contract; and Hill because they needed a blocking TE. They better not. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At the very least they have leverage with OD that they didn't have before drafting Casey.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Forget that. Daniels is a probowler. You drop one of these other scrubs before you let him get away.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Leverage or a 4th round RB to try to score on the goalline?
Leverage or a Safety who can tackle? 4 TEs is pointless. A terrible waste of resources on a position where our 2 deep was already set while we ignored spots where we had great need. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don't look at me, dude, I'm not the one in the war room making the decisions. They drafted two more TEs in April. I didn't tell them to. It was obvious to me that they hoped Casey would be a Daniels clone and would give them leverage with OD next year. Hey, maybe I'm wrong. Maybe the Texans just like having four TEs on the team, who knows.
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|