#161
|
|||
|
|||
I heard this on ESPN this morning, as well. I guess that means there are 3 rb's that we have to choose one of tonight. Would any of the 3 last until our pick in the 3rd? Would Joe McKnight be acceptable?
|
#162
|
|||
|
|||
OK, I knew there was some 'stuff' on Hardesty, but figured he would clear medical.....Maybe I'll just be happy with Gerhart or Tate. I don't know if/how far Dwyer will fall.
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/3...rce=newsletter I just hate the idea of giving up draft picks to move up. The rumors are out there that Denver and New England and San Francisco all want Gerhart. I would say, 'trust' your draft board. My problem is Gerhart is at the top of my board right now.... 1 RB Toby Gerhart 6'1" 235 4.53 Stanford 2 OG John Jerry 6'6" 332 5.15 Mississippi 3 DT Lamarr Houston 6'3" 305 4.88 Texas 4 RB Ben Tate 5'11" 218 4.43 Auburn 5 FS Brandon Ghee 6'0" 191 4.45 Wake Forest 6 OG Rodger Saffold 6'5" 306 5.23 Indiana 7 OG Jon Asamoah 6'4" 308 5.08 Illinois 8 RB Jonathan Dwyer 5'11" 229 4.64 Georgia Tech
__________________
Originally Posted by chuck I'm just sitting here thinking (pacing, actually) that whatever my issues with Kubiak he is apparently a goddam genius at tutoring quarterbacks. Last edited by Roy P; 04-23-2010 at 04:31 PM. |
#163
|
|||
|
|||
Roy, assume Gerhart is gone. Assuming your next 3 guys are there, do you take Tate or Jerry/Houston?
Tougher decision, yet, assume Gerhart and Tate are gone, do you take Dwyer or one of your higher ranked guys, assuming they are there? If you don't get a running back in the 2nd round, how much would you reach in the 3rd? |
#164
|
|||
|
|||
I'm taking Jerry before Tate and trusting my board. I may 'reach' for Dwyer or Dixon later on and hope that getting a run-blocking OG helps the running game more than the RB. Also, OGs tend to produce longer careers than RBs. Yeah, it's a big Want and I'd considered taking Tate at #51 regardless of who was on the board to 'make sure' I get a RB that I want. I could possibly 'move up' after drafting Jerry to take Tate before #81.
__________________
Originally Posted by chuck I'm just sitting here thinking (pacing, actually) that whatever my issues with Kubiak he is apparently a goddam genius at tutoring quarterbacks. |
#165
|
|||
|
|||
If Tate and Gerhart are gone by 51, I would like to not take a back in the second. If you don't get a back in the second, I think there is a big risk on not taking one until 6 or 7. How big of a howl would there be, if that happened? It wouldn't bother me. If the O-line were upgraded some, our current backs would look a lot better.
|
#166
|
|||
|
|||
If Tate AND Gerhart are both gone at #51, I trust my draft board and just take the BPA.
__________________
Originally Posted by chuck I'm just sitting here thinking (pacing, actually) that whatever my issues with Kubiak he is apparently a goddam genius at tutoring quarterbacks. |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|