IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-31-2010, 03:05 PM
Joe Joe Joe Joe is offline
Veteran Depth
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 170
Default Antonio Smith, DT?

If Barwin wins the DE spot opposite Mario, does Antonio Smith move to DT on first and second downs as well? Bush has always talked about getting penetration from the defensive line and this was one of Antonio's strong points when the Texans got him. I see this making the Texans weaker against a power rushing team, but increase the effectiveness of the pass rush.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-31-2010, 03:59 PM
Roy P Roy P is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

I don't see Barwin winning the DE spot on 1st and 2nd down. That being said, I wonder if Smith would be better than Okoye as the 3-Tech.
__________________
Originally Posted by chuck
I'm just sitting here thinking (pacing, actually) that whatever my issues with Kubiak he is apparently a goddam genius at tutoring quarterbacks.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-31-2010, 08:15 PM
nunusguy nunusguy is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,399
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roy P View Post
I wonder if Smith would be better than Okoye as the 3-Tech.
So obviously the question is, on first and second downs do we have a player on the roster now who could come in at strongside DE if Antonio is inside at 3-Tech who with Antonio would form a stronger combo than the present combo of Okoye at 3-Tech and Antonio at DE ?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-31-2010, 09:29 PM
Roy P Roy P is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nunusguy View Post
So obviously the question is, on first and second downs do we have a player on the roster now who could come in at strongside DE if Antonio is inside at 3-Tech who with Antonio would form a stronger combo than the present combo of Okoye at 3-Tech and Antonio at DE ?
A) Barwin - Cody - Smith - Williams

or

B) Smith - Cody - Okoye - Williams

or

C) Barwin - Okoye - Smith - Williams
__________________
Originally Posted by chuck
I'm just sitting here thinking (pacing, actually) that whatever my issues with Kubiak he is apparently a goddam genius at tutoring quarterbacks.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-31-2010, 10:45 PM
WMH WMH is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,795
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roy P View Post
A) Barwin - Cody - Smith - Williams

or

B) Smith - Cody - Okoye - Williams

or

C) Barwin - Okoye - Smith - Williams
I'll take D

Barwin - Smith - Dan Williams - Mario Williams

IMO, with that type of potential disruptive force, any secondary would look pretty damn good.....
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-01-2010, 07:14 AM
nunusguy nunusguy is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,399
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WMH View Post
I'll take D

Barwin - Smith - Dan Williams - Mario Williams

IMO, with that type of potential disruptive force, any secondary would look pretty damn good.....
I don't see Barwin as having much of a future as a full-time 4-3 DE, here or anywhere.
If they'd bulk him up some to play against the rush it would probably compromise his quickness as an edge-rusher. Afterall his coomparisons to Jason Babin
really aren't that far off of the mark.
Truth is he probably should have been drafted by a 3-4 team where he could play from a standup position as an OLB if we're talking about a 3-down role for him ? Now if the Texans were to go to more 3-4 schemes, then his full-time participation in the defensive lineup starts to make more sense.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-01-2010, 12:25 PM
Bigtinylittle Bigtinylittle is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 262
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nunusguy View Post
I don't see Barwin as having much of a future as a full-time 4-3 DE, here or anywhere.
If they'd bulk him up some to play against the rush it would probably compromise his quickness as an edge-rusher. Afterall his coomparisons to Jason Babin
really aren't that far off of the mark.
Truth is he probably should have been drafted by a 3-4 team where he could play from a standup position as an OLB if we're talking about a 3-down role for him ? Now if the Texans were to go to more 3-4 schemes, then his full-time participation in the defensive lineup starts to make more sense.
Well, we definately do have a problem with our pass rush, and Smith and Barwin were brought in to help with it. In Smith's case, so far the results have been underwhelming. That's not surprising, though. In more cases than not, higher dollar free agents tend to disappoint. That's why I don't agree with those fans who every year scream for us to sign one.

I think the ultimate solution to our pass rush problem, if we actually ever find one, will not come from Smith no matter where he is lined up. Most likely our solution will be a draft pick, and most likely not one from this year's class. Unless Barwin takes a huge step forward this year, our pass rush will remain in the bottom half of NFL teams.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-01-2010, 01:36 PM
gunn gunn is offline
Veteran Depth
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 149
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nunusguy View Post
I don't see Barwin as having much of a future as a full-time 4-3 DE, here or anywhere.
If they'd bulk him up some to play against the rush it would probably compromise his quickness as an edge-rusher. Afterall his coomparisons to Jason Babin
really aren't that far off of the mark.
Truth is he probably should have been drafted by a 3-4 team where he could play from a standup position as an OLB if we're talking about a 3-down role for him ? Now if the Texans were to go to more 3-4 schemes, then his full-time participation in the defensive lineup starts to make more sense.
Maybe I'm a glass half full guy... but I think you're gonna be proven wrong. As for the Babin comparison... Barwin is much more of a fluid athlete and more explosive than Babin ever was. The team has also asked him to bulk up to around 270 this year, iirc.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-01-2010, 02:00 PM
Joe Joe Joe Joe is offline
Veteran Depth
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 170
Default

It is very reasonable that Barwin will get more sacks if he gets more PT and that he should be much improved with more upper body strength and having twice the experience going into this season versus last at DE. Mario had a low year for sacks. I'm not completely down on Okoye, and think he would do better in a platoon situation with Smith. I think the Texans can get the 4 more sacks needed to be in the top half of teams in sacks.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-01-2010, 02:19 PM
Roy P Roy P is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gunn View Post
The team has also asked him to bulk up to around 270 this year, iirc.
Barwin (6'4" 254lbs) is comparable to the Vikings' Brian Robison (6'3" 259lbs) as a pass-rushing specialist [the Vikings drafted him in the 4th round]. Perhaps he could bulk up to Trent Cole or Dwight Freeney status (269lbs). We just have to make sure that he didn't lose his quickness since that was the reason we drafted him in the first place. He is supposed to complement Antonio Smith. Now, if we aren't happy with 1st and 2nd down, then we should be drafting a kid like Everson Griffen or Corey Wootton.
__________________
Originally Posted by chuck
I'm just sitting here thinking (pacing, actually) that whatever my issues with Kubiak he is apparently a goddam genius at tutoring quarterbacks.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-01-2010, 02:40 PM
gunn gunn is offline
Veteran Depth
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 149
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roy P View Post
Barwin (6'4" 254lbs) is comparable to the Vikings' Brian Robison (6'3" 259lbs) as a pass-rushing specialist [the Vikings drafted him in the 4th round]. Perhaps he could bulk up to Trent Cole or Dwight Freeney status (269lbs). We just have to make sure that he didn't lose his quickness since that was the reason we drafted him in the first place. He is supposed to complement Antonio Smith. Now, if we aren't happy with 1st and 2nd down, then we should be drafting a kid like Everson Griffen or Corey Wootton.
I'm thinking the team is hoping he will progress enough this offseason to earn the starting spot... As a result, Antonio Smith would kick inside to 3-tech (where he has had a much bigger impact) and platoon with Okoye. To me the nose could be upgraded and I think the team feels that way too but I don't think it's as high of a priority to them. Maybe someone could be brought in, in the 4-5 round range, to compete with Cody unless someone unexpected slips and is overwhelmingly atop their board.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-01-2010, 03:07 PM
Roy P Roy P is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Antonio Smith is allegedly 6'4" 285lbs, which would make him a bit light in the pants to play the DT position on 1st & 2nd down. Taking a look at the draft prospects who have legit size to play in the middle along with the necessary agility to pass rush I focus on 3 times from the Combine. 4.4_ or less in the shuttle, 7.3_ or less in the cone, and 1.69 or less in the 10 yard split. Those who competed at the Combine and meet these splits are:

Geno Atkins 6'2" 293lbs 4.43 - 7.33 - 1.68
Gerald McCoy 6'4" 295lbs 4.48 - 7.32 - 1.68
Ndamukong Suh 6'4" 307lbs 4.44 - 7.21 - 1.69
Tyson Alualu 6'3" 295lbs 4.43 - 7.15 - 1.67

That's a pretty short list. Atkins and Alualu have 10 more lbs on Antonio Smith. So, I'd prefer keeping the the Smith/Barwin platoon at DE and finding/drafting a big/fast 3-Tech to rotate with Okoye. Otherwise, I'd ask Smith to bulk up and find/draft another DE to rotate with Barwin. Either way, I'm not going to stand pat on personnel and hope that they just get better.

...This just in - Alex Brown has been cut by the Bears. Hmmmm at 6'3 & 260lbs, I could tell Antonio Smith to sit at the buffet table.
__________________
Originally Posted by chuck
I'm just sitting here thinking (pacing, actually) that whatever my issues with Kubiak he is apparently a goddam genius at tutoring quarterbacks.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-01-2010, 05:18 PM
Joe Joe Joe Joe is offline
Veteran Depth
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 170
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roy P View Post
Antonio Smith is allegedly 6'4" 285lbs, which would make him a bit light in the pants to play the DT position on 1st & 2nd down. Taking a look at the draft prospects who have legit size to play in the middle along with the necessary agility to pass rush I focus on 3 times from the Combine. 4.4_ or less in the shuttle, 7.3_ or less in the cone, and 1.69 or less in the 10 yard split. Those who competed at the Combine and meet these splits are:

Geno Atkins 6'2" 293lbs 4.43 - 7.33 - 1.68
Gerald McCoy 6'4" 295lbs 4.48 - 7.32 - 1.68
Ndamukong Suh 6'4" 307lbs 4.44 - 7.21 - 1.69
Tyson Alualu 6'3" 295lbs 4.43 - 7.15 - 1.67

That's a pretty short list. Atkins and Alualu have 10 more lbs on Antonio Smith. So, I'd prefer keeping the the Smith/Barwin platoon at DE and finding/drafting a big/fast 3-Tech to rotate with Okoye. Otherwise, I'd ask Smith to bulk up and find/draft another DE to rotate with Barwin. Either way, I'm not going to stand pat on personnel and hope that they just get better.

...This just in - Alex Brown has been cut by the Bears. Hmmmm at 6'3 & 260lbs, I could tell Antonio Smith to sit at the buffet table.
285 is light for a DT, but not something that is too light especially considering he could definitely get close to Atkins/Alualu's weight. I'm thinking the upgrade to personnel should be to get another DE and a run stopping DT. DTs that can rush the passer are expensive. I'm perfectly fine if the Texans get a DT that can rush the passer, but the high pick needed could be used elsewhere.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-01-2010, 08:05 PM
Roy P Roy P is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Joe View Post
I'm thinking the upgrade to personnel should be to get another DE and a run stopping DT. DTs that can rush the passer are expensive.
So, if I'm reading you correctly, you want a "cheap" pass rushing DE instead of an expensive pass rushing DT. Let me introduce you to the DE from Washington, Daniel Te'o-Nesheim. Currently a 4th round pick by nfldraftscout.com. He's 6'4" 267lbs with 30 career sacks and 47 TFLs. Other measurables include 4.73 - 40, 29 reps, 1.61 - 10, 4.18 - shuttle, & 6.91 - Cone. I think I'm going to have to put him on my Draft Board now. He played in either the Shrine Bowl or the Texas v. Nation game, and he got pressure.

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/p...;pageContainer
__________________
Originally Posted by chuck
I'm just sitting here thinking (pacing, actually) that whatever my issues with Kubiak he is apparently a goddam genius at tutoring quarterbacks.

Last edited by Roy P; 04-01-2010 at 08:17 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-02-2010, 10:38 AM
Joe Joe Joe Joe is offline
Veteran Depth
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 170
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roy P View Post
So, if I'm reading you correctly, you want a "cheap" pass rushing DE instead of an expensive pass rushing DT. Let me introduce you to the DE from Washington, Daniel Te'o-Nesheim. Currently a 4th round pick by nfldraftscout.com. He's 6'4" 267lbs with 30 career sacks and 47 TFLs. Other measurables include 4.73 - 40, 29 reps, 1.61 - 10, 4.18 - shuttle, & 6.91 - Cone. I think I'm going to have to put him on my Draft Board now. He played in either the Shrine Bowl or the Texas v. Nation game, and he got pressure.

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/p...;pageContainer
Exactly. Getting Smith more reps at DT improves pass rushing at two positions at the cost of hurting the run defense some. Yes, pass rushing DEs (not elite ones) are cheaper than the top ten picks needed for a good pass rushing DTs like Suh and McCoy.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-02-2010, 11:29 AM
Roy P Roy P is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Joe View Post
Yes, pass rushing DEs (not elite ones) are cheaper than the top ten picks needed for a good pass rushing DTs like Suh and McCoy.
I would be looking at Geno Atkins and Tyson Alualu, not Suh or McCoy. In fact, I'm a little greedy and would like Atkins AND Te'o-Nesheim.
__________________
Originally Posted by chuck
I'm just sitting here thinking (pacing, actually) that whatever my issues with Kubiak he is apparently a goddam genius at tutoring quarterbacks.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-30-2010, 08:39 AM
Roy P Roy P is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roy P View Post
Antonio Smith is allegedly 6'4" 285lbs, which would make him a bit light in the pants to play the DT position on 1st & 2nd down. Taking a look at the draft prospects who have legit size to play in the middle along with the necessary agility to pass rush I focus on 3 times from the Combine. 4.4_ or less in the shuttle, 7.3_ or less in the cone, and 1.69 or less in the 10 yard split. Those who competed at the Combine and meet these splits are:

Geno Atkins 6'2" 293lbs 4.43 - 7.33 - 1.68
Gerald McCoy 6'4" 295lbs 4.48 - 7.32 - 1.68
Ndamukong Suh 6'4" 307lbs 4.44 - 7.21 - 1.69
Tyson Alualu 6'3" 295lbs 4.43 - 7.15 - 1.67

That's a pretty short list. Atkins and Alualu have 10 more lbs on Antonio Smith. So, I'd prefer keeping the the Smith/Barwin platoon at DE and finding/drafting a big/fast 3-Tech to rotate with Okoye. Otherwise, I'd ask Smith to bulk up and find/draft another DE to rotate with Barwin. Either way, I'm not going to stand pat on personnel and hope that they just get better.
I would suppose the Texans shared my thought process, but went with Earl instead of Geno.
__________________
Originally Posted by chuck
I'm just sitting here thinking (pacing, actually) that whatever my issues with Kubiak he is apparently a goddam genius at tutoring quarterbacks.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.