IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The NFL Draft
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-26-2012, 08:37 AM
Keith Keith is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default Official 2012 NFL Draft Round 1 Thread

Let's use this thread for our running commentary on this evening's festivities.
__________________
Support ...IntheBullseye.com and follow us on Twitter
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-26-2012, 10:54 AM
HPF Bob HPF Bob is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,149
Default

I see two wild cards to the first round:

1) Who takes Tannehill? There seems to be a lot of teams hoping *somebody else* wants to trade up for Tannehill. Once he's off the board, the rest will follow some predictable patterns.

2) When does the run on d-linemen begin? There's about 7-8 DE/DT/OLB types who will go somewhere in the mid to late first round. Once the run gets started, I think you'll see several go in succession and then the Texans will have to see if one they like is still there or whether that has pushed down some other players (a WR or OT perhaps) that they like better.

The Texans, under Smith, seem to use the first round to take the position most of us expected but not the player most of us expected. We expected an OT a few years ago, but not Duane Brown. We expected a DL last year but not J.J. Watt. So I think the Texans will either go OLB or WR in the first round but it will be a name that wasn't linked to them in mock drafts.

The consensus is that the Texans will go some combination of OLB/WR/OT in the first three rounds and that, to me, makes the most sense. But don't overlook the possibility that they may try to upgrade their secondary, take a nose tackle, a tight end or an interior lineman with one of the first three picks if there's one guy they are just in love with.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-26-2012, 11:33 AM
chuck chuck is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,845
Default

The Vikings are on the clock.

I predict the Texans go OLB in the first. Hopefully that guy Glynn Hwyll.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-26-2012, 01:19 PM
nunusguy nunusguy is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,399
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HPF Bob View Post

2) When does the run on d-linemen begin? There's about 7-8 DE/DT/OLB types who will go somewhere in the mid to late first round. Once the run gets started, I think you'll see several go in succession and then the Texans will have to see if one they like is still there or whether that has pushed down some other players (a WR or OT perhaps) that they like better.
I think right there you've hit the essence of the Texans situation & what their plan will be for the first round tonight as that scenario unfolds.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-26-2012, 01:53 PM
Keith Keith is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Pass rushing wins championships.

That, and a healthy Matt Schaub, but you all already knew that.
__________________
Support ...IntheBullseye.com and follow us on Twitter
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-26-2012, 04:34 PM
coloradodude coloradodude is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 255
Default

I'm foaming at the mouth in anticipation of our trade up. We were 4th in points allowed. Evidently we need to be at #1.

Defense wins championships.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-26-2012, 06:48 PM
HPF Bob HPF Bob is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,149
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck View Post
The Vikings are on the clock.
Not anymore. The Browns traded up to #3. I think that can only mean they are taking Tannehill, which means the end of the Colt McCoy experiment.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-26-2012, 06:55 PM
chuck chuck is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,845
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HPF Bob View Post
Not anymore. The Browns traded up to #3. I think that can only mean they are taking Tannehill, which means the end of the Colt McCoy experiment.
I can scarcely believe that anyone would take Tannehill third or Tannehill over Blackmon but you are almost certainly right.

If anyone finds a link to the Texans' war room I would definitely appreciate your sharing it.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-26-2012, 07:20 PM
Warren Warren is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 623
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck View Post
I can scarcely believe that anyone would take Tannehill third or Tannehill over Blackmon but you are almost certainly right.
There's a school of thought that you don't take a receiver that high unless he has freakish tools, which Blackmon doesn't possess.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-26-2012, 07:22 PM
chuck chuck is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,845
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Warren View Post
There's a school of thought that you don't take a receiver that high unless he has freakish tools, which Blackmon doesn't possess.
I don't know, man, I think Blackmon is going to be the best player to emerge from this draft.

Either way it wasn't Tannehill.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-26-2012, 07:32 PM
Warren Warren is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 623
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck View Post
the best player to emerge from this draft
I think that's who the Browns may have just gotten. Of course, there's a school of thought that says you don't take a RB that high...
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-26-2012, 07:35 PM
chuck chuck is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,845
Default

I wonder who the hell the Cowboys are after.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-26-2012, 07:37 PM
chuck chuck is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,845
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Warren View Post
I think that's who the Browns may have just gotten. Of course, there's a school of thought that says you don't take a RB that high...
Blackmon is going to be terrorizing our secondary for the next decade.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-26-2012, 07:38 PM
Warren Warren is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 623
Default

You know Jerry couldn't just sit tight with all of these trades going on.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-26-2012, 07:40 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck View Post
Blackmon is going to be terrorizing our secondary for the next decade.
Can he throw it to himself?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-26-2012, 07:41 PM
chuck chuck is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,845
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Warren View Post
You know Jerry couldn't just sit tight with all of these trades going on.
Hell no. Unfortunately Claiborne can really play. Think about how much better the Texans would be if they had drafted a CB worthy of the pick when they went after Jackson.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-26-2012, 07:42 PM
chuck chuck is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,845
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by barrett View Post
Can he throw it to himself?
No, but he will catch damn near all of JJ's deflections. His YAD will be off the charts.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-26-2012, 07:46 PM
Warren Warren is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 623
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck View Post
Hell no. Unfortunately Claiborne can really play. Think about how much better the Texans would be if they had drafted a CB worthy of the pick when they went after Jackson.
Yeah, I have to admit I like the pick.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04-26-2012, 08:05 PM
HPF Bob HPF Bob is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,149
Default

Well, I was wrong about Tannehill and surprised Barron got snatched up so fast. I'm not happy about Blackmon in the division but it seems like the Jags take a WR in the first round every year and they all bust so maybe that's an omen.

I know this. The trades have made a mockery of most mock drafts.

There goes Dontari Poe who might be a bust or might be a go. Worth the money? Nobody knows.
One thing's fo sho. He ain't gonna be Poe no mo.

Last edited by HPF Bob; 04-26-2012 at 08:17 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-26-2012, 08:13 PM
chuck chuck is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,845
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HPF Bob View Post
Well, I was wrong about Tannehill and surprised Barron got snatched up so fast.
I think a lot of teams - including (especially) the Texans - misunderestimate the value of safeties.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.