IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The NFL Draft

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 05-24-2008, 02:39 PM
painekiller painekiller is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Near the Galleria
Posts: 2,852
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NBT View Post
I see it something like this, depending on injuries and retirements: LB, OL, CB/S, QB (to coach up for when Sage is gone), & finally RB.
No DE? Which OL position will you be looking at in the 2nd? OT/OG/OC?
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 05-27-2008, 02:05 PM
KJ3 KJ3 is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: h-town baby!
Posts: 563
Default

it's gotta be guard right?

brown-probably gets about 2 years to show what he is
pitts-solid, but played a few snaps
myers-should be solid
?briesel/weary/spencer?-i think briesel wins it out but he's no lock for a spot now or next year
winston-hopefully makes his career here
__________________
Cowher Power 2011!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 06-19-2008, 11:05 PM
painekiller painekiller is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Near the Galleria
Posts: 2,852
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KJ3 View Post
it's gotta be guard right?

brown-probably gets about 2 years to show what he is
pitts-solid, but played a few snaps
myers-should be solid
?briesel/weary/spencer?-i think briesel wins it out but he's no lock for a spot now or next year
winston-hopefully makes his career here
That is how I see it also. Saw a mock with us taking William Moore, FS/SS, Missouri. That is a pick I could get behind.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 06-20-2008, 12:56 PM
Maninthebox Maninthebox is offline
On the Sidelines
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Woodlands
Posts: 7
Default Bpa

Hey everybody from HPF.

For the first time in the Texans history, I can honestly say (if the 2009 draft was held today) we take the best player available. We need to get younger at RB and DE and we'll always need to improve depth. But the front office has actually filled every need. Do we have probowlers at every position? No. Do we have proven experience at every position? No. But there comes a time where mere numbers don't help. A good example is in the secondary. We could take another CB on the first day of the draft but where does that leave Robinson, Reeves, Bennett, Molden, etc.? We will eventually have to start cutting first day picks. I think we need to take the BPA and let the younger guys develop.

A lot of what we do depends on the following:
How does Colvin work out at DE?
How does Okam work out at as our runstopper?
How do the CBs develop?
How does the RB situation work out?

I guess that was a wordy way of saying, take the BPA. But if I had to emphasize any positions they would probably be D-Line and CB. And if there's a franchise RB, you might want to take him.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 06-20-2008, 03:16 PM
Bigtinylittle Bigtinylittle is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 262
Default

1. DE. Cut Weaver and his 6mil contract, lose only 1.5 mil dead money.
2. OLB. Cut Greenwood and his big contract.
3. TE to compete with and possibly beat out OD
4. BPA
5. BPA
6. BPA
7. BPA

We should have enough cap money to fill a couple or three needs with medium priced FA's. Like we have done this year with Brown, Colvin, and Reeves. I am totally against going for any 9 or 10 mil per year CB's WR's etc.

Disclaimer/ All this assumes we don't have any more career ending injuries like we had with DD, Spencer, and possibly Robinson.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 06-23-2008, 10:28 AM
KJ3 KJ3 is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: h-town baby!
Posts: 563
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigtinylittle View Post
1. DE. Cut Weaver and his 6mil contract, lose only 1.5 mil dead money.
2. OLB. Cut Greenwood and his big contract.
3. TE to compete with and possibly beat out OD
4. BPA
5. BPA
6. BPA
7. BPA
.
a 3rd round rookie is going to beat out owen daniels in his 3rd year? i liked where you were headed til the 3rd round and don't get me wrong, if we come across a stud TE like that i have no problem giving kubiak another cannon to fire....but....c'mon man...
__________________
Cowher Power 2011!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 07-05-2008, 05:13 PM
NBT NBT is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Texas Coast
Posts: 1,836
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by painekiller View Post
No DE? Which OL position will you be looking at in the 2nd? OT/OG/OC?
Post the Rosevelt signing, I would say it is simply the best player available, no matter what position, excluding QB. QB in the first nowadays seems to bring bad luck, or is it just my own experience talking here?
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 07-07-2008, 07:18 AM
KJ3 KJ3 is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: h-town baby!
Posts: 563
Default

just you NBT, there have been some good qb's in the first recently. carson palmer, eli manning, tim couch was pretty awesome....
__________________
Cowher Power 2011!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 07-15-2008, 03:35 PM
NBT NBT is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Texas Coast
Posts: 1,836
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by painekiller View Post
No DE? Which OL position will you be looking at in the 2nd? OT/OG/OC?
No DE because I think Colvin will be around for a couple of years. OL would be OT because you can always fit them in at OG if need be. OR OC as a backup to Meyers. I think we continue to tinker with RB in latter rounds just to keep the pot boiling.

I think this scouting staff is such that one or two diamonds in the dust will keep turning up in latter rounds too.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 07-15-2008, 06:50 PM
Nconroe Nconroe is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lake Conroe
Posts: 2,897
Default

I agree BPA seems reasonable since we seem to have a reasonable mix of experience and developing youth at each position for now. See what happens and who's available between now and then. Seems a stud FS and most positions could perhaps find that diamond in the haystack. I do think this regime of scouts, GM, coaches are being consistently successful in draft so far.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 07-16-2008, 10:44 AM
KJ3 KJ3 is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: h-town baby!
Posts: 563
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NBT View Post
I think we continue to tinker with RB in latter rounds just to keep the pot boiling.
do you think if smithiak had any idea that mendenhall would fall they would've had a plan to grab him instead? or were they well aware of the OT run about to happen and there was no chance in hell they were taking a RB 1st round?

i don't believe for one second they expected him there, or that none of them were questioning their plan when they realized he had fallen.

my point is that this team, being pretty even as far as talent across positions, anything is possible in the 1st regardless of denver's draft history.
__________________
Cowher Power 2011!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 07-16-2008, 01:38 PM
edo783 edo783 is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Tomball
Posts: 313
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KJ3 View Post
do you think if smithiak had any idea that mendenhall would fall they would've had a plan to grab him instead? .
Actually, I think you may have that backwards. If Brown hadn't been there they might have taken Mendenhall. They were, IMO, determined to get a quality LT and I think the only two other guys that they would have been interested in were gone. They took a fairly big gamble/risk trading back to get the 2 extra picks, but it worked.
__________________
Old age just comes at a real bad time.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 07-16-2008, 02:47 PM
NBT NBT is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Texas Coast
Posts: 1,836
Default

In a couple of years, when we see how Brown, Slaton, and Barber have worked out, will we be able to tell for sure. But I will predict now that all 3 will be doing well.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 07-17-2008, 07:50 AM
KJ3 KJ3 is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: h-town baby!
Posts: 563
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by edo783 View Post
Actually, I think you may have that backwards. If Brown hadn't been there they might have taken Mendenhall. They were, IMO, determined to get a quality LT and I think the only two other guys that they would have been interested in were gone. They took a fairly big gamble/risk trading back to get the 2 extra picks, but it worked.
you're saying you think they would've taken mendenhall if they didn't believe brown was attainable? they had a shot at both so i'm not totally sure what you mean...
__________________
Cowher Power 2011!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 07-17-2008, 08:24 AM
edo783 edo783 is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Tomball
Posts: 313
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KJ3 View Post
they had a shot at both so i'm not totally sure what you mean...
That's actually what I mean. As long as both were available they would select Brown, but if Brown was already off the board, then they might have taken Mendenhall. I'm still not sure they would have actually done it as Kubes & Gibbs don't seem to like to take 1st round RBs.
__________________
Old age just comes at a real bad time.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 07-17-2008, 09:42 AM
KJ3 KJ3 is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: h-town baby!
Posts: 563
Default

ah, i see now.

i think if the right guy was in the 1st, available, and we were up kubiak wouldn't hesistate. the denver myth thing has kind of been busted anyway...
__________________
Cowher Power 2011!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 09-09-2008, 02:42 PM
NBT NBT is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Texas Coast
Posts: 1,836
Default

Well, after the Pgh game, I sure don't know squat. Colvin was a bust (cut), Brown the "glassman" is on I/R *&^%$!, Ahman as someone predicted is hurt, and Schaub stunk up the house. Of course Kubiak and Richard Smith have to take their share of the gloom & doom too. I am feeling about 2" above whale manure today, and whale manure is on the very bottom of the ocean!!!!
__________________
NBT - Elder statesman. Wisdom comes with age - Now if i could remember what it was!
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 09-11-2008, 07:47 AM
KJ3 KJ3 is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: h-town baby!
Posts: 563
Default

whales poop? weird, i never thought about that...

anyway...i think if anything the pittsburgh game shows we need someone who can cover up the middle of the field. OLB, S, whatever.

my needs now:
1. S
2. DE
3. RB/OLB
4-7. OL/DL/RB
__________________
Cowher Power 2011!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 09-24-2008, 04:25 PM
NBT NBT is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Texas Coast
Posts: 1,836
Default

Well KJ, after the Tacks game, do you still stand by your prediction? This team is disorganized like Casserley's was. So what do we do? I say cut the fat, and get down to the players that want to win, pick up players as they become available from other teams, OR just quit and wait till next year (gag!).
__________________
NBT - Elder statesman. Wisdom comes with age - Now if i could remember what it was!
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 09-29-2008, 05:51 PM
NBT NBT is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Texas Coast
Posts: 1,836
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NBT View Post
No DE because I think Colvin will be around for a couple of years. OL would be OT because you can always fit them in at OG if need be. OR OC as a backup to Meyers. I think we continue to tinker with RB in latter rounds just to keep the pot boiling.

I think this scouting staff is such that one or two diamonds in the dust will keep turning up in latter rounds too.
Well, I really blew it on Colvin. He didn't even get out of TC. So now we are having trouble with our pass rush, as I feared.
__________________
NBT - Elder statesman. Wisdom comes with age - Now if i could remember what it was!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.