IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The NFL Draft

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 04-27-2008, 09:58 AM
Warren Warren is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 623
Default

According to popanot's link, he's more of a press guy than a zone corner. So far they're definitely sticking with guys that fit their systems.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-27-2008, 09:59 AM
Roy P Roy P is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roy P View Post
I'm looking at Carl Nicks (not going to happen after reaching for Duane Brown), Cliff Avril (doubtful with Shaun Thompson), Dre Moore, Andre Caldwell, Marcus Howard (see Avril), Jeremy Thompson, Jeremy Zuttah (see Nicks), Charles Godfrey, Quentin Demps, Antwaun Molden, and Tashard Choice.

I'd probably take Dre Moore (I've been saying that all along) but wouldn't mind Jeremy Thompson. However, the Texans are probably going to take Godfrey or Molden. That wouldn't be too bad, in my opinion.
Well Nicks was still available. I'd have loved a combo of Cason and Nicks with the first 2 picks.

Godfrey was off the board, so Molden was the BPCBA when we picked.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-27-2008, 10:05 AM
bullrush bullrush is offline
On the Sidelines
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3
Default

Here is Mayocks thoughts of Molden

Antwaun Molden, Eastern Kentucky

6-0 3/4, 198

40 time: 4.39

Projected round: 2

Mayock: "If you take the measurables of [Dominique] Rodgers-Cromartie and Molden, they're almost identical. They're both small-school guys from the same conference [Ohio Valley]. Yet Cromartie is considered a top-15 pick and this kid isn't. Why? Cromartie played in the Senior Bowl and Molden didn't. But if you just look at the tapes, you'd say Molden was a better player.''
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-27-2008, 10:07 AM
Roy P Roy P is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

I said that a few weeks ago. Molden also needs to be more of a football player and less of a "track guy" in pads.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 04-27-2008, 10:09 AM
Roy P Roy P is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

I can understand why Carl Nicks is sliding (character), but for the life of me, I can't figure out why Cliff Avril is still on the board.

Or WR Andre Caldwell and DT Dre Moore, for that matter.

Last edited by Roy P; 04-27-2008 at 10:14 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 04-27-2008, 10:13 AM
HPF Bob HPF Bob is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,149
Default

We're up.

(tick tick tick)
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 04-27-2008, 10:14 AM
bullrush bullrush is offline
On the Sidelines
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3
Default

Steve Slaton
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 04-27-2008, 10:14 AM
popanot popanot is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,916
Default

Here we go...

Steve Slaton! Fogrgot about him... I'm starting to like this draft!
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 04-27-2008, 10:15 AM
HPF Bob HPF Bob is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,149
Default

Steve Slaton, RB, ...fast but fragile. This is the guy we got for the trade down.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 04-27-2008, 10:16 AM
HPF Bob HPF Bob is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,149
Default

I think this is a good third-down back. I wouldn't make him a franchise back.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 04-27-2008, 10:21 AM
popanot popanot is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,916
Default

I would have preferred any of the RBs that went ahead of Slayton, but the guy is probably an upgrade over Walker and has the potential to turn into a homerun hitter.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 04-27-2008, 10:24 AM
Roy P Roy P is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

I was thinking we could wait on Tashard Choice or even later to get Thomas Brown or Jalen Parmele. Slaton is a 3rd down - change of pace back.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 04-27-2008, 10:29 AM
Mike Mike is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 512
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HPF Bob View Post
I think this is a good third-down back. I wouldn't make him a franchise back.
Beat me to it, but he IS a homerun threat. Not saying our line blew gaping holes last year, but "Ronnie" had some 15-25 yard runs where he was caught from behind or somone had an angle on him that someone with wheels would have taken it to the house.
__________________
Even though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I fear no evil, for You are with me; Your rod and Your staff, they comfort me. PS 23:4
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 04-27-2008, 10:47 AM
HPF Bob HPF Bob is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,149
Default

I think that's the key here. Slaton has the home run capability that most of the other backs don't and this is something our present roster collectively lacks. You can run a guy like Walker or Brown on the first two downs and turn to a guy like Slaton in the 3rd & 4-6 and see if he can bust a run or take a swing pass and get in space.

Remember all the fantasizing around here two years ago about Reggie Bush? Slaton does the same thing for a third-round price - maybe not as spectacularly as Bush but I think it's pretty obvious that Bush is a third-round talent with first-round hype.

If Slaton stays within himself, I think he'll be a great pick. If the Texans try to turn him into an everyday back, I think he'll be a disapppointment.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 04-27-2008, 10:47 AM
Warren Warren is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 623
Default

We'll see if Slaton runs as effectively inside as Brian Westbrook, a RB of comparable size, which would allow him to be more than a 3rd down/change-of-pace guy.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 04-27-2008, 10:57 AM
gunn gunn is offline
Veteran Depth
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 149
Default

Slaton reminds me of a player like Clinton Portis when he was coming out of Miami.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 04-27-2008, 11:14 AM
Vinny Vinny is offline
Undrafted Rookie
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 46
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith View Post
Let's keep it going with Day Two discussion in this thread.

I gotta believe that running back and cornerback are going to get heavy consideration with the next couple picks. I've kinda had my eye on Kevin Smith.
all hail the swami...two of three ain't bad.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HPF Bob View Post
I think this is a good third-down back. I wouldn't make him a franchise back.
a Chris Brown type selection with a bit more speed and quickness...good back to have in for screens and passing situations. Gibbs remembers how many big plays his last smallish quick rookie rb, Jerious Norwood had..

Last edited by Vinny; 04-27-2008 at 11:38 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 04-27-2008, 11:24 AM
chuck chuck is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,845
Default

Well, the team gets the LT they wanted, a CB with excellent measurables and then Steve Slaton for free. Throw in a starting QB with the second round pick and this is looking like a pretty good draft from the outset.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 04-27-2008, 11:31 AM
gunn gunn is offline
Veteran Depth
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 149
Default

Maybe Marcus Howard from Georgia here at #118 for the Texans.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 04-27-2008, 11:46 AM
Roy P Roy P is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Dre Moore and Q. Demps are off the board.

I like Marcus Howard, DeMario Pressley, Bryan Kehl, Ben Moffitt, Paul Hubbard, Stanford Kegler, or Wesley Woodyard.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.