IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-19-2009, 10:18 PM
jppaul jppaul is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 343
Default

Yeah but everybody is kinda missing the point. A FREE AGENT ACTUALLY WANTS TO COME TO HOUSTON. A marked improvement over past years imo.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-20-2009, 04:40 AM
Arky Arky is offline
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 9,291
Default

Looking at Ward's stats, he's low-mileage - a late bloomer.

The last two years of his 5 years in the league are really the only ones where he "worked". 307 carries, 1627 yards @ 5.3 yds/carry over the last two years. This, of course, is with the NYG offense....

From the little I've seen of him, he's not a one-cut-and-go back, he's just a "go" back - a tough north/south runner. He's "proven" which should count for something. Don't know if the Texans will go after him but I'd certainly like to see them work a deal with the guy. If they pass, it would be understandable...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-20-2009, 08:35 AM
edo783 edo783 is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Tomball
Posts: 313
Default

His positives are: He is a fairly big back, He has some speed, he catches well, he blocks well, low milage experienced guy and can pick up the blitz.

Negatives: He will be 29, wants more than a draft pick would cost and would be making a lot more than Steve.

Looks like a guy that could help for 2-3 years and probably isn't that big of a cap issue, but the real issue may be how Steve would see it. If they can get a sense of how Steve would see it and if he wouldn't get in a snit over it (I don't see him as that type), so I think he (Ward) would be a nice fit.
__________________
Old age just comes at a real bad time.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-20-2009, 10:15 AM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Slaton made far less than his backup Ahman Green last year. Every contributing player on their first contract is underpaid other than the top half of the first round guys. 2nd contracts are where guys cash in.

I would imagine Slaton and his agent would see it as a plus if anything, since when it comes time for contract #2 they have a very clear point of reference to jump up from.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-20-2009, 03:04 PM
Keith Keith is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by barrett View Post
Slaton made far less than his backup Ahman Green last year.
Slaton didn't enter the season as first string though. Big difference.
__________________
Support ...IntheBullseye.com and follow us on Twitter
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-20-2009, 04:23 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith View Post
Slaton didn't enter the season as first string though. Big difference.
But my point is that you don't get paid on your first contract. You get paid on the 2nd. Guys understand this. And the Texans giving a backup 4 million means that Slaton's agent can jump off from there in contract negotiations.

A signing like this does not hurt Slaton now, and it helps his ability to get paid later.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-20-2009, 04:27 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

and by the way, Chaun Thompson was paid more than Demeco last year (and that includes allocated bonuses).

It's facts of life in the NFL you don't get paid on your first deal unless you were a high 1st rounder. Slaton would have no issue with a backup making more than him.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.