IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-07-2008, 09:00 PM
painekiller painekiller is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Near the Galleria
Posts: 2,852
Default

Did not seem to miss Pittman today, maybe the snap was a little to high on the missed FG, but that also could have been the cold's effect on the ball.

I think we may have a new LS/TE on the team.
__________________
There is no failure, only feedback.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-08-2008, 01:25 PM
NBT NBT is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Texas Coast
Posts: 1,836
Default

How come Pittman, of all the guys implicated, is the only one not to be covered by the restraining order?
__________________
NBT - Elder statesman. Wisdom comes with age - Now if i could remember what it was!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-08-2008, 02:20 PM
papabear papabear is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 838
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NBT View Post
How come Pittman, of all the guys implicated, is the only one not to be covered by the restraining order?

Because the rest of them were all taking star caps, a dietary supplement containing banned substance X(don't know the exact names). Pittman was caught using banned substance Y, which is similar too but different than substance X.

The players got the injuction because they were taking an over the counter supplement and claimed that even though the folks who run the NFL substance abuse policy knew that there was a chance this product contained a banned substance they failed to properly notify the players. I don't think they have a case because the policy clearly states that the players are responsible for everything that they put in their body regardless of it's legal to buy at the grocery store and even recommends to not take ANY supplements because they aren't well regulated.

At least one of the other low profile players has already started serving his suspension, and can only hope to recoup lost money from game checks/fines.


I have never seen the details, but there was hints from Pittman that he got his stuff from a doctor....I guess he didn't follow the proper procedure to get league approval....long snappers don't get much press so I'm taking a guess here.
__________________
"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-BobMcNair
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-08-2008, 02:20 PM
kravix kravix is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 285
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NBT View Post
How come Pittman, of all the guys implicated, is the only one not to be covered by the restraining order?
He was taking a different suppliment.

Along those line i totaly disagree with the govt stepping on this. Players have access to a complete list of safe products and their manufacturers, 24 hour hotline for suppliment questions, and their trainers are supposed to be an official source also. They chose to take a supliment not on the list. Granted the label did not list the ingredient that is the cause of this, but it could have been avoided none the less.

It is also the governments fault because of the crappy FDA regulations which do not require the companies to list all ingredients on the bottle or supply a list with the product on the shelf.

The players known better and now they are throwing a hissy fit. I am going to laugh my but off if the league gets this cleared up and tells the players their suspensions will take effect immediatly through the post season, if applicable, and into the next regular season.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-08-2008, 03:34 PM
HPF Bob HPF Bob is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,149
Default

Pittman's been a screw-up ever since he got here. Never understood why we've held onto him so long other than they've been too lazy to find anyone better.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-08-2008, 07:01 PM
kravix kravix is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 285
Default

I have to disagree Bob, he was arguably one of the best LS in the league. I can only remeber 1 bad snap prior to this year, and most of his bad snaps this year were around the very high stress times for him.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-08-2008, 10:45 PM
HPF Bob HPF Bob is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,149
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kravix View Post
I have to disagree Bob, he was arguably one of the best LS in the league. I can only remeber 1 bad snap prior to this year, and most of his bad snaps this year were around the very high stress times for him.
Well, let's see. I remember the alley-oop snap in a game against the Jets a couple of years ago. Then there was the airball that went over Turk's head last year in San Diego for a touchdown. And those are just the really memorable ones, not the ones where the holder saved his bacon.

I haven't seen much of the Texans this year in Austin but Pittman seems to average one truly horrific f-up per year and a few more poor snaps that might cause a bad punt or a bad hold. IMO, he's one of the players holding us back from being a playoff-caliber team.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-09-2008, 12:28 AM
Arky Arky is offline
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 9,291
Default

I just have never liked wasting on roster spot on a long snapper. Most of these guys are pretty athletic.... can't one of the linemen or tight ends or someone learn to pick up this trade with extra practice? It's not rocket science....

On another note, was somewhat perplexed when the TV camera showed a #82 sitting next to Owen Daniels on the bench after his fumble. Who the hell was that? I had to look it up.... Turned out to be the new guy, Clark Harris TE/LS....
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.