![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
The fear will always be that 4th rounder out plays the 1st rounder. Also with BOB I don't see them keeping a fourth QB, so one of them would most likely be staffed on IR.
So not a likely draft
__________________
There is no failure, only feedback. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
It's not likely, but I would like to see who picks up the Offense quicker.
__________________
Originally Posted by chuck I'm just sitting here thinking (pacing, actually) that whatever my issues with Kubiak he is apparently a goddam genius at tutoring quarterbacks. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Heard that Chargers are willing to trade #3. So I tried it on fanspeak.
Used DraftTek chart 3: R1P3 QB CARSON WENTZ NORTH DAKOTA ST 85: R3P22 RB KENNETH DIXON LOUISIANA TECH 120: R4P21 TE NICK VANNETT OHIO ST 159: R5P20 S SEAN DAVIS MARYLAND 166: R5P27 CB CYRUS JONES ALABAMA 198: R6P20 WR KOLBY LISTENBEE TCU TRADE PARTNER: SAN DIEGO CHARGERS GET: ROUND: 1 PICK: 22 ROUND: 2 PICK: 21 FUTURE ROUND 1 PICK FUTURE ROUND 2 PICK TEXANS GET: ROUND: 1 PICK: 3 Expensive Trade, so the question becomes "Is Wentz the Guy"?
__________________
There is no failure, only feedback. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
That's a heck of a draft, but just too much to give up for my taste. I also don't see Dixon lasting that long. For that cost, I'd probably go a different direction.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Also on this list Dixon was available, and iirc, Williams from Arkansas was there at that pick also.
__________________
There is no failure, only feedback. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
But that is the question here isn't it - "Is Wentz the Guy" ? |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
I had heard conflicting reports that the 49ers were willing to trade down and that they were willing to trade Kaepernick (the Texans were mentioned as a suitor but apparently nobody bothered to ask the Texans first). So I tried using the offer of our 2016 #1 and 2017 #1 plus 2016 #2 to move to #7 to get Goff or Wentz. The problem was, in this sim, the Cowboys took Wentz so I could either take Lynch, take another position or trade down. I traded back down with Philly at #13 for a pair of thirds.
So I wound up with Lynch, Hooper and both Arkansas RBs but I'm out the following year's #1. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
I traded up with the 9ers again for #7 involving our #1s in 2016 and 2017 plus our #2 this year. I also traded down twice for more depth later on:
7: R1P7 QB CARSON WENTZ NORTH DAKOTA STATE 86: R3P23 TE NICK VANNETT OHIO STATE 149: R5P10 S MILES KILLEBREW SOUTHERN UTAH 159: R5P20 RB KELVIN TAYLOR FLORIDA 166: R5P27 CB JONATHAN JONES AUBURN 187: R6P9 ILB JOSH FORREST KENTUCKY 198: R6P20 ILB JARED NORRIS UTAH 238: R7P19 FB DEREK WATT WISCONSIN TRADE PARTNER: NEW YORK GIANTS SENT: ROUND: 4 PICK: 21 RECEIVED: ROUND: 5 PICK: 10 ROUND: 6 PICK: 9 TRADE PARTNER: SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS SENT: ROUND: 1 PICK: 22 ROUND: 2 PICK: 21 FUTURE ROUND 1 PICK RECEIVED: ROUND: 1 PICK: 7 TRADE PARTNER: MINNESOTA VIKINGS SENT: ROUND: 3 PICK: 22 RECEIVED: ROUND: 3 PICK: 23 ROUND: 7 PICK: 19 I forget which big board I used but they were all pre-combine. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
FanSpeak's first list post combine.
11: R1P11 QB CARSON WENTZ NORTH DAKOTA STATE 52: R2P21 DT VERNON BUTLER LOUISIANA TECH 85: R3P22 RB ALEX COLLINS ARKANSAS 120: R4P21 CB CYRUS JONES ALABAMA 140: R5P1 TE TYLER HIGBEE WESTERN KENTUCKY 159: R5P20 WR KOLBY LISTENBEE TCU 166: R5P27 S JAYRON KEARSE CLEMSON 198: R6P20 OT WILLIE BEAVERS WESTERN MICHIGAN Trades TRADE PARTNER: CHICAGO BEARS GET: ROUND: 1 PICK: 22 FUTURE ROUND 1 PICK TEXANS RECEIVED: ROUND: 1 PICK: 11 TRADE PARTNER: TENNESSEE TITANS GET: FUTURE ROUND 4 PICK TEXANS RECEIVED: ROUND: 5 PICK: 1 5 offensive picks 3 defensive picks Potential franchise QB, athletic NT with size, stud SEC RB with speed, day one slot CB, athletic TE, burner WR, box safety, that can cover, raw athletic OT. Two trades that give up next year, but the offense starts to rebuild now. I could endorse the draft. Nice group. If the Texans were to get Wentz, then I would consider the draft a success. Add in the other parts picked here and you added much needed depth or potential starters.
__________________
There is no failure, only feedback. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|