![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, Hackenberg should be listed. The O'Brien-Penn St. ties are there. Not that the Texans have taken a single PSU player over the last two years, but it could happen.
There's also been talk about Cook being a douche and not much of a team leader. It's tough this time of year sorting between what we can see and what we just won't know about a player medically or personally. Always wary of misinformation. I have Goff and Lynch at 3 and 4, but at this point it seems both will be taken before any other QBs and likely before the Texans have an honest chance. That said, who knows... this will be an interesting couple months since there is not an Andrew Luck or Cam Newton here that is clearly at the head of the class. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don't know if I have Cook at the top of my want list, but I agree there is no clear #1, only a top 4 or 6 guys.
And all seem to be projects.
__________________
There is no failure, only feedback. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think they're going to go after Hackenburg. It's only fitting.
He's shown some flaws in the past couple of years without OB around and OB, I'm sure, probably thinks he can fix him. Might be possible to get him in the second round but a lot still to shake out before the official draft. My guess is that the really top prospects won't make it to where we pick in the 1st round. Playing QB for the Texans the last couple of years has been a meat grinder so whoever is chosen, especially if they are an underclassman, should sit and learn for at least a year... So, we may be looking at another year of Hoyer/Weeden/Savage/whomever placeholding.... I'd like to see Savage get more of a chance next year while the rookie watches from the sidelines....... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm still holding on to my hope/theory that our QB room will be Brees, Hoyer, and Savage/Rookie.
__________________
In B'OB we trust, until he pisses us off! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think we're certainly out of range for Goff/Lynch and likely out of range for Cook now. Even at that, I sort of like Wentz's potential better than Lynch/Cook and hope he's there when we draft. If we want a QB in RD1, we might have to move up a bit to get him. As I see it, the Browns, Cowboys, 49ers, Saints, Eagles, Rams, Bills and Jets could potentially go QB. Some (Browns, 49ers, Rams, Jets) obviously to a larger degree than others.
1 Tennessee Titans 3-13 0.188 2 Cleveland Browns 3-13 0.188 3 San Diego Chargers 4-12 0.250 4 Dallas Cowboys 4-12 0.250 5 Jacksonville Jaguars 5-11 0.313 6 Baltimore Ravens 5-11 0.313 7 San Francisco 49ers 5-11 0.313 8 Miami Dolphins 6-10 0.375 9 Tampa Bay Buccaneers 6-10 0.375 10 New York Giants 6-10 0.375 11 Chicago Bears 6-10 0.375 12 New Orleans Saints 7-9 0.438 13 Philadelphia Eagles 7-9 0.438 14 Oakland Raiders 7-9 0.438 15 St. Louis Rams 7-9 0.438 16 Detroit Lions 7-9 0.438 17 Atlanta Falcons 8-8 0.500 18 Indianapolis Colts 8-8 0.500 19 Buffalo Bills 8-8 0.500 20 New York Jets 10-6 0.625 I think a lot of it depends on if the Cowboys stand pat with Romo and go another position (which I think they will), the Saints re-sign Brees (which I think they will), and the Eagles re-sign Bradford (which I think there's a good chance they do). If that happens, I feel we'd have to jump up to pick 11-14 for Cook/Wentz (or QB3), or pick 14-18 for Cook/Wentz (or QB4). If all those guys are gone, Hack might be the next option in RD2, but I think we'd have to move up in that RD to get him. This is assuming some other QB prospect doesn't rise up the board. I think there are few other guys that rate right around where Hack is currently rated. I'm OK with going into next year with Hoyer as the bridge QB, but yeah, they need to address QB now and try something! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
In B'OB we trust, until he pisses us off! |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|