IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-06-2013, 04:18 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Then McNair followed up with talk about how talented our roster still is and an instant turn around (so this year was all Kubiak's fault, Smith is a great GM, and fans should keep believing and paying).

And then he named Lovie Smith as an example of a guy to interview. Lovie might as well be the Defensive Gary Kubiak.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-06-2013, 04:36 PM
chuck chuck is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,845
Default

McNair is clueless and this franchise is doomed.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-06-2013, 05:26 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck View Post
McNair is clueless and this franchise is doomed.
We just need him to be right once.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-06-2013, 06:00 PM
nunusguy nunusguy is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,399
Default

Not sure why Lovie is held in such low esteem by some, but at the least a sit down with him would meet the perfunctory Rooney Rule.
Now for a Bro with more "color", perhaps David Shaw would be a more appealing prospect ?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-06-2013, 06:49 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nunusguy View Post
Not sure why Lovie is held in such low esteem by some, but at the least a sit down with him would meet the perfunctory Rooney Rule.
Now for a Bro with more "color", perhaps David Shaw would be a more appealing prospect ?
I consider Kubs a 8-8 guy. There are a few great coaches and a few terrible ones, and then 20+ guys who won't fix or break a team. Lovie and Kubs are those guys. They coach talent to its level and that's that.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-06-2013, 07:19 PM
WMH WMH is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,795
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by barrett View Post
And then he named Lovie Smith as an example of a guy to interview. Lovie might as well be the Defensive Gary Kubiak.
He was asked a specific question about Lovie, and he answered that question. He's an obvious interview for several reasons, but he didn't do anything other than answer a question.
__________________
In B'OB we trust, until he pisses us off!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-06-2013, 09:01 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WMH View Post
He was asked a specific question about Lovie, and he answered that question. He's an obvious interview for several reasons, but he didn't do anything other than answer a question.
What are the several reasons?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-06-2013, 09:14 PM
WMH WMH is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,795
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by barrett View Post
What are the several reasons?
HC experience, NFL experience, couple of playoff trips, made it to the big game, etc. Regardless of what you or I may think, he's a qualified applicant. And I really hate to say this, but a minority candidate.

Not saying he'd be my choice, but can guess pretty confidently he'll be in the mix.
__________________
In B'OB we trust, until he pisses us off!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-06-2013, 09:24 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WMH View Post
HC experience, NFL experience, couple of playoff trips, made it to the big game, etc. Regardless of what you or I may think, he's a qualified applicant. And I really hate to say this, but a minority candidate.

Not saying he'd be my choice, but can guess pretty confidently he'll be in the mix.
I really don't mind him as an interview, but I like David Shaw much more as a candidate and as a rooney interview. I just can't get fired up about a defensive coach.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-06-2013, 09:47 PM
nunusguy nunusguy is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,399
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by barrett View Post
I just can't get fired up about a defensive coach.
Parcells, Belichick ? You know, I was thinking those guys did OK in the NFL ? Didn't they both coach up in the northeast some where, around Beantown ?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-07-2013, 02:10 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nunusguy View Post
Parcells, Belichick ? You know, I was thinking those guys did OK in the NFL ? Didn't they both coach up in the northeast some where, around Beantown ?
Those are great ones. If we could get one of those, I would be fired up.

But they say Bellachik sits in every QB meeting today and coaches them as much as any other position. Recent years have had mostly offensive coaches winning superbowls.

Maybe I just hope it's an offensive guy because that is the side of the ball that appears to most need fixing after watching the last 11 weeks. That and the knowledge the new coach will almost certainly have a rookie QB to groom.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.