![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I agree 100%. We need a big body for short yardage, but he has to be able to carry his weight. We have 2 rookies that have a very good shot at making the team at DT and someone is going to loose a job. IMO Okam is the guy gone, but I am giving him the benefit of the doubt until I see more from him in preseason.
__________________
There is no failure, only feedback. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't see how you can justify keeping Davis at his salary. He's proven worthless as a wide receiver as long as Angry Dre is healthy, and based on last season, he's lost a step in the return game. Holliday should beat him out there pretty easily. Lilliputians with 10-flat 100 times are pretty tough to tackle. If Holliday makes any strides whatsoever as a receiver, Davis is gone for sure. I don't see a whole lot else that I disagree with, though I'd like to see Dreesen stick around. He's serviceable, and I just like him. I think I may have been the first person ever to recognize him in public, and he was super cool, so I'm sure that plays a role. It also wouldn't surprise me if we carry four RB's.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Now you maybe right and Davis is gone, but I still think he is one of the top 53. As for RB, who do you see being the #4 guy? I don't see anyone that will be on the team if someone else is not hurt.
__________________
There is no failure, only feedback. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
(on wanting DT Frank Okam to put on a meaner face) "Well, there's no doubt about it, (DT) Frank's (Okam) a really nice guy and he's been doing a really good job. We're really impressed with what he's able to do so far. If he did have that mean streak in him, it would give him that little edge that you always want in a player. You love when they're not on the field but you want them to have that mean streak when they're on the field." http://www.houstontexans.com/news/St...?story_id=6272 ...really good job, ...We're really impressed. These are surprising comments to me. I think pretty much everyone who has posted on the message boards has been very negative about Okam. I seem to remember another comment, maybe by Kubiak, a week or so ago that said Okam was doing some good things. How nice would it be if he realized his potential, less the mean streak? |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
OK then, well I'm now totally confused about what I'm hearing about Okam ?
I've been hearing he's a gonner in part because of strong showings by rookies DTs Mitchell & Sheppard and his own lackluster efforts, but now he's gettin' high-5s all over the place by the the HC and his line-coach ? |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Last Monday, he looked like a light bulb was on, he looked like he wanted to have job come September. Will that bulb stay on? Not sure... But he did look improved last Monday, IMO. And remember I had Okam making it on to my original 53 prediction.
__________________
There is no failure, only feedback. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
http://www.texansbullblog.com |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
PK said this: "As for RB, who do you see being the #4 guy? I don't see anyone that will be on the team if someone else is not hurt."
__________________ Now that rookie Tate is hurt, it looks like Foster, Slaton, Chris Henry, and Jeremiah (Was a Bullfrog) Johnson.
__________________
NBT - Elder statesman. Wisdom comes with age - Now if i could remember what it was! |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
I knew I jinxed us when I typed that.
__________________
There is no failure, only feedback. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|