IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The NFL Draft

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-12-2009, 10:49 PM
HPF Bob HPF Bob is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,149
Default

Good point.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-12-2009, 11:14 PM
Nconroe Nconroe is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lake Conroe
Posts: 2,897
Default

So are these trades and others being considered by teams because players asking for too much compensation?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-13-2009, 08:08 AM
WMH WMH is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,795
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nconroe View Post
So are these trades and others being considered by teams because players asking for too much compensation?
Braylon.....maybe.

Quinn is still in the beginning of a multi-year deal, so I wouldn't think he would have a leg to stand on.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-13-2009, 10:23 AM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Quinn would fit very well in Denver. The offense was a poor fit for Cutler but is a good one for Quinn (short passes, timing routes, completion % over a big arm and downfield attacking, lots of check offs to RBs and TEs, obvious similarities to Weiss's offense). Plus the Broncos have the two first round picks this year. I'd much rather spend one on Quinn then Sanchez/Freeman for what their offense is looking for.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-13-2009, 11:15 AM
Keith Keith is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

The Broncos have Kyle Orton, so maybe they're not desperate for Quinn, but I agree that Quinn seems to be a pretty good fit for what I imagine the Broncos will be trying to do.

If they were to add Quinn, I'm not sure if they would send Orton to the Browns, somewhere else, or keep him though.

The Jets are a logical landing spot for Quinn, but that would require Eric Mangini sending him to his former team. Oh, the intrigue.
__________________
Support ...IntheBullseye.com and follow us on Twitter
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-13-2009, 11:47 AM
mussop mussop is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: livingston
Posts: 360
Default

Edwards isnt worth a first round pick. Drops way to many balls.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-13-2009, 12:42 PM
Keith Keith is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mussop View Post
Edwards isnt worth a first round pick. Drops way to many balls.
If I'm the Eagles, with two late first rounders, I think really hard about giving up #28 for him, definitely.

Yeah, he drops balls. So does Terrell Owens. Actually, Angry Dre has been blamed for drops (and gotten better at it). Did you see the QB play in Cleveland last year, too?

I think after Crabtree, Edwards might be a pretty safe bet, and any team in need of a WR outside of the top ten with no hope of drafting Crabtree would consider Edwards. And Roy Williams sorta set the bar in terms of trade value when the Cowboys gave up a first rounder for him. Is Williams that much better than Edwards? I don't think so.
__________________
Support ...IntheBullseye.com and follow us on Twitter
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.