IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 11-11-2008, 07:28 PM
NBT NBT is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Texas Coast
Posts: 1,836
Default

I think it is about time for McNair to step in. He is the owner and the heart and soul of this franchise. Whether he should fire Kubiak or not, or whether he should step in and give that young man a stiff talking to about using some different gameplans, both offense, and for sure defense. We are just plain too predicatble on both sides of the ball.

Rick Smith can get along without Kubiak, if that is what it takes. He needs to make sure Bobbie Grier does a better job of evaluating free agents, or just tie a can to his rear end, and send him on his way.

It seems houston's pro teams have to do everything the hard way. The drafting lately has been fine. The FAs have not stood the test of time, and have been way too cost prohibitive for the service they have performed. The on field coaching schemes have been sometimes decent on offense, but always terrible on defense. (I don't think the defensive personnel are as bad as they have looked.)
The defensive coaches should be shook up, and given the word, to put up or get out. Richard Smith more than the rest.
__________________
NBT - Elder statesman. Wisdom comes with age - Now if i could remember what it was!
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-11-2008, 10:50 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

I have no problem with Rick Smith. I think we have enough talent to win now. I mean the Falcons have enough talent to win now. Even without a genius coach to win games with nothing/matt cassell, we could be 5-4 (jags and colts) and fighting for the playoffs if we just didn't make so many dumb gameday moves from the Head Coach on down to the backup QB.

But most damning of all for Kubs is the fact that this team is talented enough to win most of the time at home, but we can't buy a road win. that is a coaching/leadership/attitude issue.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-11-2008, 11:03 PM
Big Texas Big Texas is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,469
Default

I heard Eric Winston on 610 this evening and he was asked who were the vocal leaders of the team and he could come up with nothing.

There you have why this team can not ralley from a deficit

There you have why this defense cant make a game changing 3 and out

There you have why this team cannot seem to force turnovers

There you have why this team looks a pitiful mess and no one on the team seems to care

There you have why a qb has thrown 4 int in a single game and he's still in the game

WE HAVE NO LEADERS ON THIS TEAM. TALENT BUT NO LEADERS. NOBODY WILLING TO MOTIVATE THE TEAM.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-11-2008, 11:58 PM
chuck chuck is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,845
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by coloradodude View Post
I wonder what Sly is thinking about now?
He's thinking that the Giants have a QB that looks really hot in tight, white pants. What do you think he's thinking?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-12-2008, 12:28 AM
mussop mussop is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: livingston
Posts: 360
Default

I cant believe anyone reads Jerome Soloman! Talk about a hack! Its to bad his performance isnt judged on the same scale as Kubiacks. He would of been gone along time ago.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 11-12-2008, 05:22 AM
TheMatrix31 TheMatrix31 is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,042
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Texas View Post
I heard Eric Winston on 610 this evening and he was asked who were the vocal leaders of the team and he could come up with nothing.

There you have why this team can not ralley from a deficit

There you have why this defense cant make a game changing 3 and out

There you have why this team cannot seem to force turnovers

There you have why this team looks a pitiful mess and no one on the team seems to care

There you have why a qb has thrown 4 int in a single game and he's still in the game

WE HAVE NO LEADERS ON THIS TEAM. TALENT BUT NO LEADERS. NOBODY WILLING TO MOTIVATE THE TEAM.
It's a shame, because DeMeco is such a leader on the field football-wise. We could really use him being vocal with the defense, a la Ray Lewis or something.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 11-12-2008, 10:40 AM
papabear papabear is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 838
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NBT View Post

It seems houston's pro teams have to do everything the hard way. The drafting lately has been fine. The FAs have not stood the test of time, and have been way too cost prohibitive for the service they have performed.
I disagree with this. Green and Reeves are the two FA's they spent money on. Green was a calculated risk. They knew if he could stay healthy he would help this team, but there was a good chance that he would have trouble staying healthy. On the four plays he's been healthy he has looked good. It's easy to say it was a bad decision now and they probably over paid, but they knew what they were getting into and gave it a shot.

Reeves has a big contract for his agent to mouth off about, but it's structured so that we can get out of it relatively pain free cap wise if he's not working.

Guys like Eugen Wilson, Demps, Bentley, etc have all been cheap and filled holes on this team....in some case they have been an upgrade.
__________________
"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-BobMcNair
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 11-12-2008, 02:40 PM
coloradodude coloradodude is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 255
Default

So I agree with this. Rick Smith is not the problem because he's done a pretty good job with contracts of the free agents. He walked into a salary cap mess...thank you, one Charles "Spend it if yougot it" Casserley.


Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 11-12-2008, 03:03 PM
NBT NBT is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Texas Coast
Posts: 1,836
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by papabear View Post
I disagree with this. Green and Reeves are the two FA's they spent money on. Green was a calculated risk. They knew if he could stay healthy he would help this team, but there was a good chance that he would have trouble staying healthy. On the four plays he's been healthy he has looked good. It's easy to say it was a bad decision now and they probably over paid, but they knew what they were getting into and gave it a shot.

Reeves has a big contract for his agent to mouth off about, but it's structured so that we can get out of it relatively pain free cap wise if he's not working.

Guys like Eugen Wilson, Demps, Bentley, etc have all been cheap and filled holes on this team....in some case they have been an upgrade.
Uuuhh......you don't don't go into games in the NFL on a calculated risk. Either they are ready, or they are not ready. And worth the price. No Green and Reeves show how much this franchise is now grasping at straws to find something, anything to hang a hat on.
__________________
NBT - Elder statesman. Wisdom comes with age - Now if i could remember what it was!
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 11-12-2008, 03:06 PM
NBT NBT is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Texas Coast
Posts: 1,836
Default

Yes, Casserly the culprit. BUT he was not here when we picked up some of these woe begone FAs, and their even worse salaries. Bobbie Grier is supposed to be evaluating FA talent, but how much influence have the coaches been having in this process? We still have a personnell problem, as well as a coaching problem.
__________________
NBT - Elder statesman. Wisdom comes with age - Now if i could remember what it was!
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 11-12-2008, 03:20 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Reeves has played well. He was signed as a half season replacement for Dunta but I think he has clearly outplayed Bennett as well. And when you look at how CBs are payed in FA, it is a good contract.

Green was a bad move in that it gave us a false sense of security heading into last season that we didn't need a RB. Then we get stuck with Dayne as our feature back.

And nobody can argue about Smith's ability to sign cheap veterans who contribute. Overall he has done a good job. I have no doubt he put enough talent on the field to win games. Like I said if we are talented enough to win 9 of our last 13 home games, we are talented enough.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 11-12-2008, 03:37 PM
papabear papabear is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 838
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NBT View Post
Uuuhh......you don't don't go into games in the NFL on a calculated risk.
Your cup is either running over its bone dry isn't it? They knew Green was a risk. Smith made one big gamble and it hasn't paid off. It's not like it put us in cap hell. That's not enough for me to get upset about.

Reeves got big money, but I think we can get out of it relatively cheap cap wise.

Other than those two he's done a good job of cleaning up the cap mess leftover from Casserly.

We haven't been spectacular in free agency, but we've gotten guys who can contribute. I would rather take this approach than to go out and spend big money on FA's the way the raiders and 49ers have recently.
__________________
"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-BobMcNair
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 11-12-2008, 05:28 PM
Mike Mike is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 512
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Texas View Post
I heard Eric Winston on 610 this evening and he was asked who were the vocal leaders of the team and he could come up with nothing.

There you have why this team can not ralley from a deficit

There you have why this defense cant make a game changing 3 and out

There you have why this team cannot seem to force turnovers

There you have why this team looks a pitiful mess and no one on the team seems to care

There you have why a qb has thrown 4 int in a single game and he's still in the game

WE HAVE NO LEADERS ON THIS TEAM. TALENT BUT NO LEADERS. NOBODY WILLING TO MOTIVATE THE TEAM.
I think "vocal" leaders and that term is simply overrated. Actions are what speak louder than words. Put me on the team, and I can be rah, rah, but if you suck, then who will listen? I have heard AJ has spoken up more, as has Demeco and Dunta. Vocal leaders is BS. Sure, Ray Lewis is a vocal leader, but he is a bad ass on the field. Bob sanders, vocal bad ass. We need a bad ass that can play and then back that up with words. It is not something that can be taught, it is within you. It might not be in Mario or AJ to as our best players to be vocal. That is overrated. We need guys who can make plays, not just run their mouth. NFl players should not need a teammate to get on their ass to be motivated. Simply put, the team needs more playmakers on defense.
__________________
Even though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I fear no evil, for You are with me; Your rod and Your staff, they comfort me. PS 23:4
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 11-12-2008, 05:30 PM
Mike Mike is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 512
Default

[QUOTE=Big Texas;5502]
There you have why a qb has thrown 4 int in a single game and he's still in the game QUOTE]

Right (insert sarcasm). Let's put in a QB signed last week against the Ravens. Great idea.
__________________
Even though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I fear no evil, for You are with me; Your rod and Your staff, they comfort me. PS 23:4
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 11-14-2008, 01:14 AM
dadmg dadmg is offline
Veteran Depth
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Spearfish, SD
Posts: 203
Default

I am on board with another year of Kubiak regardless of how the second half turns out. Head coaching changes tend to create more problems than they solve; unless you have an incompetent coach, stability in systems is preferable. I think we've built a very nice offense and have the foundations for what can grow into a dominant defense as the key players mature and some of the positively gaping holes are plugged. I was worried going into this year that fan expectations would doom Kubiak - I think our team continues to move in the right direction, but I didn't think we were near as far along as some here did. Combine that with a rough early schedule and Dunta's injury and I didn't think we had much of a hope of the playoff talk that I was hearing.

But I still think this team is headed in the right direction and that another good draft could push us over the top. If Kubiak is fired, I think we enter another rebuilding period with new philosophies that will likely set back our growth curve. I wasn't much of a Kubiak fan when we hired him; I openly hoped we'd look elsewhere even when it was apparent we had our sights set on him. I was wrong. He's built a dynamic offense up from scratch and we have several young standouts on D, we just need to continue to fill holes on that side of the ball. Kubiak's a solid coach and definitely one I believe we can win with if we keep on this track. I just don't think there will be that much winning this year.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 11-14-2008, 09:23 AM
papabear papabear is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 838
Default

There's only one change that this team can make that will come anywhere close to guaranteeing that we'll be in the playoff hunt. Cut down on turnovers. We're -12 and last in the league.

There are holes on the roster that need to be fixed for sure. You can complain about the defensive scheme too....but a new scheme isn't going to teach Reeves to turn around or keep guys from missing tackles.

Kubiak gets some of the blame for the int's, but most of them were just bonehead throws that an NFL QB should not make.

We can change the head coach, the defensive coordinator, the secondary, three fourths of the D-line.....and none of it will make any difference if we don't quit turning the ball over. I still think Schaub can be "the" guy, but if we have to get a new quarterback to stop turnovers then so be it.
__________________
"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-BobMcNair
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 11-14-2008, 04:06 PM
kravix kravix is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 285
Default

I was looking for a good place to put this, and this seemed the best place atm without starting a new thread.

Kubiak knows how fast HC's can be hired in fired in this leauge, everyone knows from the fans to the waterboys. I doubt he loses his job this year even if the team doesnt win another game, but IMO anything less than a 7-9 season moves him from the hot seat to the fire next year. Mandating a 9+ win 09 season to keep his job. Another 8-8 or better season this year would at least give him another year of buffer.

I have officially jumped on the fire Richard Smith bandwagon, and I would be suprised to see him back next year. That said the biggest reason I believe that he will not lose his job midseason is the turnover margin. Yes the def needs to take away the ball more, yes they need to play better red zone def, and for the love of god they need to play all 60 minutes of the game.

Even so going into last weeks game the def was ranked 17th overall, middle of the pack not great but its been worse. Although the off was ranked 4th (I think that is what I saw) the turnovers should have made them much lower. When the off is turning the ball over that much, with quite a few in our own territory, it is hard for the def to get out there and make that many plays.

How do you fire a man when all you have done most of the year is set him up for failure? High scoring games? How many of those scores are def scores, how many are the def giving up points from a turnover that left the opponent in the red zone, and how many are just the def giving up points like most defs do?

I have said this before and I am going to say it again. Smith cannot be blamed for all of the def issues. Kubiak is the HC and no matter where he spends his time and effort the def is still part of his job. This D has no identity besides getting beat up though, they arent tough and unmovable, they aren fast and swarmig, they loosey goosey tacklers that just happen to be in the right place every 6 plays or so.

It could be the play calling by Smith, piss poor position coaching, bad scheme, bad personel, or just flat our bad coaching all around.

My point is unless the Off stops handing the ball to the opposing team with a kiss and a pat on the butt saying "go ahead and score big fellas we love you", Richard Smith will be the DC of this team until the season ends or right up against it when there is nothing to play for but maybe the pride they finally decided to pull out of their lockers and dust off.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 11-15-2008, 02:54 PM
dadmg dadmg is offline
Veteran Depth
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Spearfish, SD
Posts: 203
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by papabear View Post
There's only one change that this team can make that will come anywhere close to guaranteeing that we'll be in the playoff hunt. Cut down on turnovers. We're -12 and last in the league.

...

I still think Schaub can be "the" guy, but if we have to get a new quarterback to stop turnovers then so be it.
I was going to dispute this based on the notion that Sage was skewing our turnover data unduly, but, while Sage is a bit more loose with ball security (he's averaging roughly 3 Fumbles + INTs per game), Schaub's not looking that hot either (roughly 2 fumbles + INTs per game).

The fumbles are especially troubling - pro-rated they're close to Carr-levels when the golden boy was leading the league in fumbles back-to-back years. His INT rate (3.3%) during his time in Houston isn't awful (roughly around Eli Manning and Brett Favre's career levels) but it isn't impressive and really pales to most of the active successful West Coast QBs who tend to have rates in the low 2's (examples: Hasselbeck, Garcia). His yards per attempt rate the past two years has actually been among the best in the league so when he doesn't turn it over, Schaub can be pretty deadly (although this is also one of those categories where having Andre Johnson can come in quite handy) but that's not the issue.

I'm still not looking to replace Schaub; we've got far greater issues on defense that are going to demand our attention and resources. But ball security should be something a quarterback's developed more of by their 5th year in the league. I can live with the interception rate, although I certainly hope it improves, but I'm still disturbed at the fumble rate. Quarterbacks that fumble rarely learn to become non-fumblers - it's usually a career-long issue.

Alright, that was a fun statistical digression. Now time to get back to my never-ending classwork, which is thankfully math-free.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 11-15-2008, 04:33 PM
NBT NBT is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Texas Coast
Posts: 1,836
Default

To clear the air, I am not the one saying Rick Smith is doing a bad job. I admire the job he has done so far with the exception of Reeves and Green. I know green was recommended by Sherman before he left. Reeves is on Rick Smith's watch. I don't know how much he was influenced by Kubiak or the defensive coaches, but any Cowboy fan would have told us what a joke he is in coverage. Anthony Weaver is another big mistake, but not attributable to Smith. We are like the cow that keeps stepping on her udder. She doesn't mean to, she just keeps looking for greener grass.
__________________
NBT - Elder statesman. Wisdom comes with age - Now if i could remember what it was!
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 11-17-2008, 06:30 AM
coloradodude coloradodude is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 255
Default

My personal opinion.

I saw something on the NFL channel (I think) the other day with Schottenheimer on it. He's done. Looks like he has the beginning stages of Parkinson's.

And on a side note..the inability to make a decision to FIRE a defensive coordinator does not make you a better head coach. If Koobs won't listen to me then he can enjoy the games on Sunday from home with guys like me.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.