IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-27-2011, 04:24 PM
Arky Arky is offline
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 9,291
Default The upcoming Steelers game, 10/2/2011

The (2-1) Texans will take on the (2-1) Pittsburgh Steelers this Sunday at home. The Texans are coming off a tough road loss to the New Orleans Saints losing 40-33 while the Steelers squeaked out a road win against the Indianapolis Colts, 23-20 on Sunday Night Football. Pittsburgh got embarrassed in their season opener losing 35-7 at Baltimore but rebounded nicely shutting out Seattle 24-0 at home in week 2. This will be the 3rd road game for Pittburgh in the first 4 weeks of the season.

TV = CBS (channel 11 local), noon CST

Announcers = Greg Gumbel, Dan Dierdorf

This will make 3 out of 4 weeks for the Gumbel/Dierdorf team doing the Texan broadcast. Most of America will be watching.

Favorite = (currently) Texans by 4
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-27-2011, 08:12 PM
HPF Bob HPF Bob is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,149
Default

Texans waived Steve Slaton today and promoted Chris Ogbannaya according to NFL.com. Hard to argue with the move. Opens up a PS position.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-28-2011, 12:43 PM
Nconroe Nconroe is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lake Conroe
Posts: 2,897
Default

We gotta get ready for the next big challenge and get back on winning side of things.

Should be a very close game.

Hopefully we figure out the red zone scoring and deep pass defence by Sunday.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-28-2011, 05:45 PM
NBT NBT is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Texas Coast
Posts: 1,836
Default

Wade Phillips says the empty backfield in the fourth quarter of the Saints game did the defense in. Then he said they had practiced against it the whole week? wtf.

We still have problems in the secondary. Playing too far off the ball by the CB's when defending our own goal. It seemd that Jacson and Quin had the most problem.

Schaub had a 103. something QB rating, but that doesn't tell the tale of bad redzone play.

Would it have been any better if Foster had been able to play?

You can bet Pgh will be looking at that video and licking their lips

I think we should be doing better with our adjustments in the 4th quarter.
__________________
NBT - Elder statesman. Wisdom comes with age - Now if i could remember what it was!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-29-2011, 08:17 AM
TheMatrix31 TheMatrix31 is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,042
Default

We better freakin' win. If we're gonna have Arian back, if we're gonna be going up against the awful Steelers OL, if we're gonna be at home....we have to win.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-29-2011, 08:38 AM
Golden Arm Golden Arm is offline
Training Camp Fodder
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: North Texas
Posts: 15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NBT View Post
Wade Phillips says the empty backfield in the fourth quarter of the Saints game did the defense in. Then he said they had practiced against it the whole week? wtf.

We still have problems in the secondary. Playing too far off the ball by the CB's when defending our own goal. It seemd that Jacson and Quin had the most problem.

Schaub had a 103. something QB rating, but that doesn't tell the tale of bad redzone play.

Would it have been any better if Foster had been able to play?

You can bet Pgh will be looking at that video and licking their lips

I think we should be doing better with our adjustments in the 4th quarter.
Here's what concerns me about teams spreading us out and going 4 or 5 wide. Why have a LB on the field in those sets? Do you really think Cushing or DeMeco can stick with a RB or TE/WR on a designated passing play? Why not go with 4 DL, 4 CBs (Joseph, Jackson (I guess), Allen, and McCain/McMannis), and 3 safetys (Manning, Quinn, and Nolan)? Why put Cushing in a position where he has to guard a Sproles or Graham when you know the Saints are going to throw the ball?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-29-2011, 09:41 AM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden Arm View Post
Here's what concerns me about teams spreading us out and going 4 or 5 wide. Why have a LB on the field in those sets? Do you really think Cushing or DeMeco can stick with a RB or TE/WR on a designated passing play? Why not go with 4 DL, 4 CBs (Joseph, Jackson (I guess), Allen, and McCain/McMannis), and 3 safetys (Manning, Quinn, and Nolan)? Why put Cushing in a position where he has to guard a Sproles or Graham when you know the Saints are going to throw the ball?
Seriously? You came away from that game thinking we need to figure out how to get more of our CBs on the field. We don't have 2 guys I feel comfortable with and you want 4?

Sproles did not have much 4th quarter impact. I remember him catching 1 out route for 10 yards or so. And Graham was victimizing Glover Quinn on his TD. The problem was never our LBs in coverage in this game. It was no pressure on Brees up front and no coverage on any of their WRs in the backend.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.