IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-15-2009, 12:33 PM
Arky Arky is offline
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 9,291
Default Zone blocking scheme outdated?

I've seen a lot of talk lately on the messageboards and blogs about the Texans ZBS vs. big, physical defenses - how the 3-4 defenses always give the smaller/lighter/athletic offensive lineman fits. About how the ZBS is an outdated system..... but I'm just not buying into it.

IMO, it is still personnel. You gotta have the right guys. I don't think by and large that most people have a problem with (our) the two tackles - Winston and Brown. It's those guys in between them where you see all the stones being cast. I believe Pitts and Myers are coming off of injuries and perhaps they both aren't 100% and 100% in "football shape". I look for both of them to be better this week against the Titans. But, eventually, I think we are gonna need and upgrade of the center and two guards. IMO, a competent smaller/quicker/athletic lineman should be able to deal with the bigger guy in front of him. We may already have one of the upgrades on the roster in Caldwell. And who says they have to be "smaller"? Can't you get a quicker/athletic guy in the medium or even large variety?

Eric Winston's take on the Jets game.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-15-2009, 01:35 PM
Nconroe Nconroe is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lake Conroe
Posts: 2,897
Default

Pretty much agree and enjoyed Winston's analysis. I too was wondering about the health of Myers, Pitts, and Schaub on being able to execute properly. Caldwell and Butler are a little bigger if we wanted to add some size in the OL.

I'm wondering if Kubiak will take back the play calling for a few games. And having Walters back may help a little. I suspect the motivation/intensity/preparation won't be a problem this coming weekend, if it was this past weekend.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-15-2009, 04:15 PM
WMH WMH is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,795
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nconroe View Post
I'm wondering if Kubiak will take back the play calling for a few games. And having Walters back may help a little. I suspect the motivation/intensity/preparation won't be a problem this coming weekend, if it was this past weekend.
I can definitely see this happening. I haven't watched the TV replay, but a buddy of mine told me that after a dumb 4th down call, the camera was on Kubiak and he said something to the effect of "Kyle, what the hell was that?"

I know there are some out there ready to mail it in after one piss poor game, but I am too dumb to do so. Every year we drop one or two that we are "supposed" to win, but we will snag a couple that we are "supposed" to lose. That's the NFL, happens everywhere, every year.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-15-2009, 04:27 PM
papabear papabear is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 838
Default

I don't think the basis of the scheme is outdated, but you have to continually adjust any scheme to counter the adjustments the defense makes. I think we did the right thing last year by cutting the running game down to its' simplest parts to focus on executing the basics well. I think it would probably be a good idea to add a few wrinkles back in this year...mix back in a few more man principles to keep defenses off balance.
__________________
"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-BobMcNair
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-15-2009, 04:36 PM
nunusguy nunusguy is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,399
Default

There was an unusually big man playing NT in the 3-4 for the Jets Sunday, Kris Jenkins is reportedly 360 and he actually looked bigger than that and I
know he looked much bigger to Texans center Myers. But whoever is lined up on that guy probably is gonna get pushed around and yea, get knocked down with one swat of an arm from that big grizzly.
Sometimes offensive lines have problems because they are too big and immoble vs smaller quicker DLines. For example I just checked the Titans web site which lists their starting DLine at < 280 iibs and we know that the Colts have historically also had smallish but very quick DLineman.The Texans smaller than average OLine (it's not really that small, but neither is it a large line) didn't have the problems it had because of its size or because it was running the ZB system, it had the problems because HC Kubiak and his assistants totally blew it in their preparations for the game. They played these guys last year and knew (or should have known) what was coming and got the line ready for it. Next summer, if Kubiaks still here, maybe he'll concentrate on getting his team ready for the season-opener instead of talking about how they were gonna be in the playoffs ?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-15-2009, 07:23 PM
Big Texas Big Texas is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,469
Default

I agree, although Myers was getting okie doked, like an episode of punk'd, this loss falls purely on Kubiak's shoulders. If he saw Myers was getting pushed around why not make a change. See what Caldwell could do. He could do no worse than what Myers was doing.

Also their screen execution was abysmal. Kubiak just did not have anyone in the right position to succeed.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-15-2009, 08:49 PM
Arky Arky is offline
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 9,291
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Texas View Post
.......... Also their screen execution was abysmal......
Ya, that's another thing... All these Jets blitzers - somebody had to be open...

Until we can prove we can beat the blitz (and get it on film) we can expect more of the same from every team coming down the pike. Just blitz like hell and get Schaub rattled and you can beat the Texans....
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-15-2009, 07:26 PM
NBT NBT is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Texas Coast
Posts: 1,836
Default

Kubiak has a history of not preparing his troops to go to war, to wit the Saints, Vikings, and now the Jets games this year. It is not personnel at all it is Kubiaks irritating habit of slow starts the last two years. And this will just not work out with McNair who has gone on record as saying he wants (demands) better than 8-8 this year. Like it or not Kubiak is in hot water.
__________________
NBT - Elder statesman. Wisdom comes with age - Now if i could remember what it was!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-15-2009, 09:27 PM
Roy P Roy P is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arky View Post
Can't you get a quicker/athletic guy in the medium or even large variety?

Eric Winston's take on the Jets game.
That's what I look for every draft. I was somewhat surprised that Caldwell fit into our "quicker/athletic" guy. You can probably do a search and see what kind of OL I'd be looking for from a Combine Stats kind of thing. Of course they still have to be able to block, or you end up with Gallery.

Can't say that I'm happy with Myers, but I'm even more dissappointed that Brisel is a starter. If Caldwell can't beat that guy out for the RG position, we may have wasted a pick.
__________________
Originally Posted by chuck
I'm just sitting here thinking (pacing, actually) that whatever my issues with Kubiak he is apparently a goddam genius at tutoring quarterbacks.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-16-2009, 12:08 AM
Arky Arky is offline
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 9,291
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roy P View Post
....If Caldwell can't beat that guy out for the RG position, we may have wasted a pick.
I think he's in the grooming process right now..... Roster actually has him listed as a "C" (center). Also, sounded like Studdard won a lot of brownie points during camp and pre-season....
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-16-2009, 01:16 AM
Fonz the Boss Fonz the Boss is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 351
Default

In short, the ZBS didnt work this week because the Jets defense had bigger, faster, and stronger guys than our offensive personnel.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-16-2009, 09:05 AM
mussop mussop is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: livingston
Posts: 360
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roy P View Post
That's what I look for every draft. I was somewhat surprised that Caldwell fit into our "quicker/athletic" guy. You can probably do a search and see what kind of OL I'd be looking for from a Combine Stats kind of thing. Of course they still have to be able to block, or you end up with Gallery.

Can't say that I'm happy with Myers, but I'm even more dissappointed that Brisel is a starter. If Caldwell can't beat that guy out for the RG position, we may have wasted a pick.
I agree with you about Caldwell. When I watched him he seemed top heavy when out in space. I really didnt think he fit this scheme.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-16-2009, 11:05 AM
TexanJedi TexanJedi is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mussop View Post
I agree with you about Caldwell. When I watched him he seemed top heavy when out in space. I really didnt think he fit this scheme.
Bama runs a zone scheme. Maybe he's not a prototypical Denver-style lineman, but he comes from a ZBS background, ironically run by Joe Pendry (under Saban). The Texans have a bad habit of not always playing the best player so I can't hold that against him.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-16-2009, 12:01 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TexanJedi View Post
Bama runs a zone scheme. Maybe he's not a prototypical Denver-style lineman, but he comes from a ZBS background, ironically run by Joe Pendry (under Saban). The Texans have a bad habit of not always playing the best player so I can't hold that against him.
when has this happened? we've never had good enough depth for good players to not play.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-16-2009, 12:23 PM
TexanJedi TexanJedi is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by barrett View Post
when has this happened? we've never had good enough depth for good players to not play.
Sage Rosenfels not playing (over Carr), Green over Slaton for a while, Anyone over Myers, DelJuan Robinson last year, Weaver over Bulman, getting rid of a perfectly good Sam LB in Danny Clark.

I'm not saying that these guys playing would have equaled playoffs (our coaching staff seems slow to make adjustments when something does not work and that kills this team), but clearly guys like Weaver, Myers, and Green were playing because of the money they were signed for. I mean how can Caldwell or White be worse than Myers?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.