IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-26-2011, 04:55 PM
Keith Keith is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default Texans Interested in Eric Weddle [Re-Signed with Chargers]

Picked this up from Matt Thomas on 790AM and from Jason Cole at Yahoo. David Canter is Weddle's agent btw...

@SportsMT @davidcanter on @sportstalk790...Eric Weddle is in talks with several teams...Texans "there is interest"


@JasonColeYahoo 6 teams express interest in Weddle. Jax, hou, Dallas, minn, Indy and SD. Could make $7m per.
__________________
Support ...IntheBullseye.com and follow us on Twitter
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-26-2011, 05:59 PM
NBT NBT is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Texas Coast
Posts: 1,836
Default

Weddle would be a good complement to Quinn at safety. But what about that experienced CB we need? Has Aso made up his mind yet?
__________________
NBT - Elder statesman. Wisdom comes with age - Now if i could remember what it was!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-27-2011, 08:16 AM
Nconroe Nconroe is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lake Conroe
Posts: 2,897
Default

Weddle is supposed to be the top FA Safety, or top 3, so that would be nice to see in Houston.

Here is a good review of FA CB and Safety available for now.
http://www.footballsfuture.com/2011/fa/db.html

I was just looking at interception stats at
http://www.footballdb.com/stats.html...0&lg=NFL&conf=

Surprizingly found near the top Jason Allen with total of 6 last year.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-27-2011, 10:32 AM
HPF Bob HPF Bob is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,149
Default

$7 mil is too much. He's good but not that good.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-27-2011, 12:07 PM
TheMatrix31 TheMatrix31 is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,042
Default

Weddle goes back to SD.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-27-2011, 12:38 PM
WMH WMH is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,795
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HPF Bob View Post
$7 mil is too much. He's good but not that good.
Try $8MM.....

Agree, he's good, but that is crazy for a S with short hair

@sdutChargers: Weddle gets $40 mil for 5 years. $19 guaranteed.
__________________
In B'OB we trust, until he pisses us off!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-27-2011, 10:31 PM
WMH WMH is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,795
Default

Apparently, we made a pretty decent efforts at this guy.... If you can't beat'em, make'em spend more than they wanted to
No one will ever know if it is fact or fiction, but I saw this via PFT:

https://www.signonsandiego.com/news/...-back-burnett/

The Chargers have essentially spent $49 million on their defense in the past 24 hours -- $40 million to safety Eric Weddle (five years, $19 million guaranteed) and $9 million (three years, $3 million guaranteed) to linebacker Takeo Spikes.

There probably is not enough left for Kevin Burnett, according to those familiar with the Chargers attempt to balance their needs with their wants.

Those sources said Monday night that the inside linebacker who had a career year in 2010 was going to have to come down on his asking price to be in play for the Chargers. Separate sources said previously that price was more than $5 million a year. By Tuesday morning, after the Chargers had extended their budget slightly to make sure they got Weddle from the clutches of the Houston Texans, it had become virtually certain that Burnett will be playing elsewhere this season.
__________________
In B'OB we trust, until he pisses us off!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-27-2011, 11:53 PM
painekiller painekiller is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Near the Galleria
Posts: 2,852
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WMH View Post
By Tuesday morning, after the Chargers had extended their budget slightly to make sure they got Weddle from the clutches of the Houston Texans, it had become virtually certain that Burnett will be playing elsewhere this season.
Good for the Texans, Weddle is good but not $8MM a year good. It would have been nice to sign him, and a decent corner, but now we can after Aso. Not sure that Aso is not playing the same game.
__________________
There is no failure, only feedback.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-28-2011, 12:49 AM
edo783 edo783 is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Tomball
Posts: 313
Default

Seems like we made a solid run at him with a bunch of cash. Like him, but pretty glad SD got him with that kind of price tag.
__________________
Old age just comes at a real bad time.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-28-2011, 09:30 AM
Joshua Joshua is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by painekiller View Post
Good for the Texans, Weddle is good but not $8MM a year good. It would have been nice to sign him, and a decent corner, but now we can after Aso. Not sure that Aso is not playing the same game.
While I agree in principle, I also think if you're waiting for one of the top free agent safeties, corners, or whatever other position you need, to sign with you for reasonable terms, you'll never sign anybody. The fact of the matter is you have to overpay in free agency, particularly if you're a team who is not considered a contender and you're chasing one of the top tier free agents. Thus, the ideal situation is to not have to rely on free agency. The Texans don't have this luxury. They're going to have to overpay. Not saying Weddle was the guy to overpay, but virtually every free agent signing, when viewed in isolation, generally looks like the team overpaid. The only problem is, while waiting around for some top notch free agent to suddenly and inexplicably become "reasonable," everyone may be signed with other teams. I don't want the Texans waiting around for something that is not realistically going to happen and then ending up with either nothing or low end JAGs.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-28-2011, 03:02 PM
painekiller painekiller is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Near the Galleria
Posts: 2,852
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshua View Post
While I agree in principle, I also think if you're waiting for one of the top free agent safeties, corners, or whatever other position you need, to sign with you for reasonable terms, you'll never sign anybody. The fact of the matter is you have to overpay in free agency, particularly if you're a team who is not considered a contender and you're chasing one of the top tier free agents. Thus, the ideal situation is to not have to rely on free agency. The Texans don't have this luxury. They're going to have to overpay. Not saying Weddle was the guy to overpay, but virtually every free agent signing, when viewed in isolation, generally looks like the team overpaid. The only problem is, while waiting around for some top notch free agent to suddenly and inexplicably become "reasonable," everyone may be signed with other teams. I don't want the Texans waiting around for something that is not realistically going to happen and then ending up with either nothing or low end JAGs.
IMO they offered Weddle in the 6MM to 7MM range, which forced the Chargers into the overpayment. I think the Texans wanted Weddle and a top 5 CB. But once Weddle got so high they backed off, why? IMO, it's because if you are going to overpay someone, overpay Aso or Joseph, not Weddle. And I think the Texans figured that out also.
__________________
There is no failure, only feedback.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-28-2011, 03:25 PM
Joshua Joshua is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by painekiller View Post
IMO they offered Weddle in the 6MM to 7MM range, which forced the Chargers into the overpayment. I think the Texans wanted Weddle and a top 5 CB. But once Weddle got so high they backed off, why? IMO, it's because if you are going to overpay someone, overpay Aso or Joseph, not Weddle. And I think the Texans figured that out also.
I agree with that and hopefully that's what happens. Should know shortly.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-28-2011, 05:00 PM
Keith Keith is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Interesting article here on Weddle's agent during the time when the Texans were pursuing his client.
Quote:
6:15 PM: Canter goes on a Houston radio station to discuss Weddle's availability. Minutes later, he hears from the Houston Texans for the first time. They're now in the hunt, too.

9:24 PM: The Chargers send their first e-mail in regards to Weddle and Canter's not thrilled with their numbers. He goes back and forth with McGuire for the next several hours.
http://www.gq.com/sports/profiles/20...-agent-signing
__________________
Support ...IntheBullseye.com and follow us on Twitter
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.