IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-11-2008, 05:48 PM
nero THE zero nero THE zero is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Spring
Posts: 366
Default Idea for the offseason

A while back, Lance Zierlein said that he thought Lawrence Maroney would be a good fit for our offense and that he would be a good trade target.

I think that is more apt now than ever.
1. He's a big back at 5'11" 220lbs. He could be the thunder to our newly found lightning (Slaton)
2. He has extensive experience with the ZBS at Minnesota (averaged 6YPC and had 32 TD in 3 seasons)
3. He should be fairly cheap. NE has seemingly given up on him; they have drafted and signed a glut of RB to play behind/around him, seemed to shy from giving him a heavy workload (averaging a meager 12 touches per game,) and were supposedly trigger happy on IR'ing him this year.
4. He is signed through 2010 at very reasonable price (2009: $600,000, 2010: $825,000)

I would be very interested to see what it would take to get him. He is a great fit for us and could be a paragon low risk, high reward candidate.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-11-2008, 06:09 PM
NBT NBT is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Texas Coast
Posts: 1,836
Default

Don't let the stars get in your eyes. We would be better off seeing what is available in the draft. If Maroney is on IR, there is a pretty good reason, IMO.
__________________
NBT - Elder statesman. Wisdom comes with age - Now if i could remember what it was!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-12-2008, 02:03 AM
coloradodude coloradodude is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 255
Default

NE hasn't really given up on him. He's on IR with a shoulder injury...done for the season.

We'll do pretty good in the draft this year, what with a top 5 pick and all. Already talking about next year.

Crap!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-13-2008, 12:51 PM
NBT NBT is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Texas Coast
Posts: 1,836
Default

Could this be the reason for all the recent suckitude? Naahh! Couldn't be. We're not trying to get a lower place in the Draft.
__________________
NBT - Elder statesman. Wisdom comes with age - Now if i could remember what it was!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-13-2008, 04:42 PM
Keith Keith is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

I'm trying hard not to turn this into a draft thread, but I'd be up for going high in the draft for RB next April. The success of young QBs like Ryan and of otherwise mediocre offenses like the Titans is because they have multiple good backs. We have Slaton, add a high pick stud, and suddenly this offense goes off.

I think needs-wise this offseason, the list is pretty easy to form, and most of them are on defense (um, linebacker and safety, please?). But those are positions that can be filled with vets in free agency (assuming our pro scouting department is overhauled).

The Falcons went all in to get that RB in free agency (Turner), and so far so good for them I suppose, but signing a FA RB (or trading for a hurt one like Maroney) just scares the hell out of me.
__________________
Support ...IntheBullseye.com and follow us on Twitter
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-13-2008, 05:59 PM
NBT NBT is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Texas Coast
Posts: 1,836
Default

While I agree with you Keith, I don't think you went far enough. If the present administration is still standing watch next year,(and McNair says he still has full confidence in Kubiak), then I think we have to have better linebacking and safeties, but I also would keep a sharp eye out for a DE, and maybe another DT. In any case i would go real hard for defense. RB? Depends on what is available, but I don't think I would give it a first round priority. TE's are going to be real good for a change, as will OT & MLB. As always, the Jrs. that come out will change the complexion entirely, I suppose.
__________________
NBT - Elder statesman. Wisdom comes with age - Now if i could remember what it was!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-13-2008, 07:58 PM
nero THE zero nero THE zero is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Spring
Posts: 366
Default

I would give DT, DE, LB, and QB all priority to RB in the first round.

It's a huge need and I was a huge proponent of RB in the first rd last year (I wish Stewart would have fallen to us) But, our defense and QB takes precedent this year for me. That's why I think we need to find another route (Maroney, FA, later rounds, etc.) for a RB this offseason.

But, I agree, RB is definitely a huge need for us.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-14-2008, 04:37 PM
NBT NBT is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Texas Coast
Posts: 1,836
Default

Schaub is a younger version of Kerry Collins, the erstwhile QB for the undefeated Tacks. Both are immobile in the pocket. The reason Collins is doing so well finally, is that he has got a dominating Oline. If we get to the point that Schaub has the time to setup and make his progressions, he will be an undefeated QB too. We need to keep improving with the Oline we have by grabbing a guard somewhere, and maybe an OC. Otherwise, it is defense for me all the way.
__________________
NBT - Elder statesman. Wisdom comes with age - Now if i could remember what it was!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-14-2008, 04:41 PM
nero THE zero nero THE zero is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Spring
Posts: 366
Default

We need a QB that can play well for us for 16 games.

That's what we need.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.