IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The NFL Draft
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-19-2011, 02:54 PM
NBT NBT is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Texas Coast
Posts: 1,836
Default RGIII a future Texan?

If QB RGIII from Bayloor is available in the second round of this next draft, would you give up a second for him?
__________________
NBT - Elder statesman. Wisdom comes with age - Now if i could remember what it was!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-19-2011, 03:29 PM
Joshua Joshua is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 549
Default

I haven't watched RGIII closely enough to have a specific opinion on him, but I have absolutely no problem with us spending a high draft pick on a QB. In fact, I would welcome it.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-19-2011, 03:31 PM
HPF Bob HPF Bob is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,149
Default

No. He has better throwing mechanics than Vince Young but he's essentially Vince Young. His game doesn't translate to the NFL. By the fifth round, I *might* consider him depending on how his combine/pro day appearances go.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-19-2011, 06:48 PM
painekiller painekiller is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Near the Galleria
Posts: 2,852
Default

He is listed as 6-3 and 210lbs, for an NFL QB a little on the small side. Yes I know there are exceptions to the rule, but I am not looking for a QB playing in a gimmick offense.

As Joshua said, I would welcome an early QB in this draft, but not sure if this is the right guy.
__________________
There is no failure, only feedback.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-19-2011, 10:30 PM
Blitzwood Blitzwood is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 399
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HPF Bob View Post
No. He has better throwing mechanics than Vince Young but he's essentially Vince Young. His game doesn't translate to the NFL. By the fifth round, I *might* consider him depending on how his combine/pro day appearances go.
Where have I heard this before.....oh yea, when Cam Newton was being evaluated.

He's not stinking it up after all in Carolina, I've seen this kid play, he's legit.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-19-2011, 10:56 PM
WMH WMH is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,795
Default

While I would lean more Blitz's way than Bob's, I don't see this kid being available in the 2nd. Too many QB needy teams out there, plus, I think the kid can flat out play. Better/more accurate than VY, with lesser talent around him, IMO.

Our draft will hinge on our success this year. We win the division, Kubiak stays and gets an extension. Schaub is tied to him, and will likely receive the same extension.

We lose, new regime will likely want "their" QB, so there's really no telling what would/could happen. Could end up picking 1 mid 1st. With the new salary structure, not as big of a deal to draft a QB of the future and let him sit while Schaub plays out his contract.

Just my opinion.
__________________
In B'OB we trust, until he pisses us off!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-19-2011, 11:07 PM
HPF Bob HPF Bob is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,149
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blitzwood View Post
Where have I heard this before.....oh yea, when Cam Newton was being evaluated.

He's not stinking it up after all in Carolina, I've seen this kid play, he's legit.
Not so much here but on other boards, I was saying that Newton had excellent throwing mechanics and a tight spiral, something I never saw from Young or Tebow. What I questioned about Newton was his maturity. Is he the sort of kid that's not going to read defenses or not going to stay out of trouble? But I had no questions about his physical skills.

I haven't watched a lot of Baylor games but I haven't been wowed by Griffin's passing skills. What makes him exceptional is his legs. I will say, however, that his completion percentage has been exceptional this year but Vince also led the NCAA in completion pct. in his junior year.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-20-2011, 01:32 PM
NBT NBT is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Texas Coast
Posts: 1,836
Default

Thanks gents, I appreciate your comments.

If Kubs doesn't turn this team around, and I mean start winning again by beating the Titans, We will be in another dismal 3 year rebuilding cycle, after he is gone. I don't know if I could take that. But then, what's the alternative?

Kubs is trying to turn the playcallin over to the OC and just control the game, but this one is not a Baby Shanny, and I don't think he is taking to it very well.
__________________
NBT - Elder statesman. Wisdom comes with age - Now if i could remember what it was!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-20-2011, 02:31 PM
chuck chuck is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,845
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NBT View Post
If Kubs doesn't turn this team around, and I mean start winning again by beating the Titans, We will be in another dismal 3 year rebuilding cycle, after he is gone.
I don't agree at all. There is more than enough talent on the roster to where a competent head coach could come aboard and win immediately. There's not Super Bowl talent (yet), but there is definitely playoff talent.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-20-2011, 03:13 PM
Joshua Joshua is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 549
Default

Agree with Chuck. I see no reason why a new coach would need 3 years to whip this team into shape. If this is the case, someone needs to call Harbaugh in SF and tell him to slow down. He's 2 years and 10 games ahead of schedule.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-20-2011, 05:01 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck View Post
I don't agree at all. There is more than enough talent on the roster to where a competent head coach could come aboard and win immediately. There's not Super Bowl talent (yet), but there is definitely playoff talent.
Absolutely. Go watch the talentless niners and tell me there is such a thing as a 3 year rebuilding process in the NFL. Nobody is that far from winning. Only bad coaching can lead to prolonged losing in today's NFL.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-20-2011, 05:04 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HPF Bob View Post
No. He has better throwing mechanics than Vince Young but he's essentially Vince Young. His game doesn't translate to the NFL. By the fifth round, I *might* consider him depending on how his combine/pro day appearances go.
He has little in common with young other than race. He is undersized but a fantastic passer. Nobody throws a deep ball half as well in college football. Also one if the most accurate passers in the NCAA (total opposite of young).
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-20-2011, 07:04 PM
chuck chuck is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,845
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by barrett View Post
Absolutely. Go watch the talentless niners and tell me there is such a thing as a 3 year rebuilding process in the NFL. Nobody is that far from winning. Only bad coaching can lead to prolonged losing in today's NFL.
Bad ownership can do that, too, definitely. I like the Niners, and I like the Lions, too, for that matter, but I feel like the Texans are better, much better, up and down the roster. You know I'd love to say so if I thought different, but there it is. I mean, Alex Smith? Are you joking?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-22-2011, 01:16 PM
NBT NBT is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Texas Coast
Posts: 1,836
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck View Post
I don't agree at all. There is more than enough talent on the roster to where a competent head coach could come aboard and win immediately. There's not Super Bowl talent (yet), but there is definitely playoff talent.
Hello Chuck, how is the climate where you are? Warm & sunny I would wager. Always nice to hear again from a friendly enemy.

You know as well as I do that a new coach will also bring his broom. Who would you suggest for head coach? One who would keep the WCO, but probably opt for a new QB, #2WR, & blocking FB. Probably some of the OLinemen would be out of work or relegated to backup.

It is more than time for McNair to change his mindset, and go for some of the high profile FAs to augment a team that is 85% there.

But more than likely McNair will go the easy route and just elevate Wade, who is an excellent DC, but not a viable HC.
__________________
NBT - Elder statesman. Wisdom comes with age - Now if i could remember what it was!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-22-2011, 04:55 PM
HPF Bob HPF Bob is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,149
Default

There's no question in my mind that if Kubiak is fired in the next 15 months, Wade Phillips will be named the next head coach. One thing we know about McNair is that he's not a creative thinker. He's going to do the most predictable move and that's going to be promoting Phillips. Don't get your hopes up for anyone else.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-22-2011, 09:20 PM
nunusguy nunusguy is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,399
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HPF Bob View Post
There's no question in my mind that if Kubiak is fired in the next 15 months, Wade Phillips will be named the next head coach. One thing we know about McNair is that he's not a creative thinker. He's going to do the most predictable move and that's going to be promoting Phillips. Don't get your hopes up for anyone else.
I sorta thought that getting the HC job if Kubiak was fired was a condition of employment that Wade insisted upon before he agreed to take the DC job ?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-22-2011, 10:37 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

I hope Wade doesn't want the job. At some point you'd like to think he would figure out what he is and what he isn't, no matter how many owners keep being convinced by his great coordinator performances that the head coaching failures don't count.

Of course, he has won more Cowboys playoff games than all the other cowboys coaches combined in the last 15 years.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-22-2011, 11:00 PM
edo783 edo783 is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Tomball
Posts: 313
Default

A man has ta know his limitations ........ and HC is Wades. Big mistake to go that route. Not sure Kubes isn't in then same boat .... but, together they may make it work.
__________________
Old age just comes at a real bad time.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-23-2011, 12:17 AM
chuck chuck is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,845
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NBT View Post
Hello Chuck, how is the climate where you are? Warm & sunny I would wager. Always nice to hear again from a friendly enemy.
You and I aren't enemies, not as far as I'm concerned. We're all friends here despite the various and inevitable disagreements.

If the team loses two more games before the bye - a definite possibility - I'll start looking seriously into replacement coaches, not because anyone cares what I think but simply to daydream a bit. In something of an about-face I think my current inclination would be to go young and relatively unknown. But smart. I wonder what it would be like to have an intelligent head coach.

I would be happy to upgrade Schaub and Jacoby but I firmly believe the team (when healthy) can win with both. As much as I loved Vonta I am perfectly happy with Casey at TE for reasons that have been discussed here previously. No, he is not the bulldozer blocker that one might wish for but he causes so many problems for defenses that I think that one tradeoff is more than made up for by his versatility.

Yes, it is warm here and lately anyway unusually sunny. November and December are by far the rainiest months here in my immediate area and the rains usually pick up as November approaches. So far it's been relatively dry with more sunny days than I'd expect. Today was spectacularly sunny. I could see distant clouds on the other side of the continental divide (where the climate patters are totally different) and some thunderheads well out to sea, but here it was beautiful. I can tell that the dry season is approaching because the humidity is often surprisingly low during the day. Any of you who lives in Houston or has spent any time there will know exactly how this feels. When I say surprisingly low I mean like 70% or 75% rather than 90%. But the difference is immediately palpable. You'll get some days like that in October in Houston but more often they pile up in November. It's not cool during the day. It's never cool during the day at sea level here. But you can stand around outside and not sweat through your shirt in five minutes. Hell, it might take ten or fifteen. The nights are beautiful. I imagine now it's low seventies, low humidity. Clear skies, lots of stars. I practically never use air conditioning because my house is reasonably open and well ventilated but I very recently quit being a total idiot and covered (and extended) the perfectly ample back patio, put down some nice tile, built an outdoor kitchen along one side, bought a particularly nice outdoor sofa set and a dining table. So I'm planning to spend the great majority of my time out there going forward.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-23-2011, 05:03 AM
TheMatrix31 TheMatrix31 is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,042
Default

I would much rather spend a higher pick on a WR or safety.

As is plain as day, our WR corps is absolutely nothing without Andre, and is causing us to lose games.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.