Quote:
Originally Posted by barrett
But the high tender was 1.5 million a year and that is what they got him for. How is that a bad deal? And the gauranteed money is tiny. Not to mention if you sign him as a RFA for a year he hits URFA next year and probably receives another raise. There is no way the deal he got is worse for us than the high tender would have been.
|
your right...and we even save a little cap room this year this way. It was just risky to dangle a guy who was obviously a big part of our plans for next year out there for no more than a 7th round pick. The money's close so at the end of the day it works out OK, but it was an unnecessary risk IMO because if Denver or someone else threw closer to #2 money at him then we have taken our one position group that was more or less set and turned it into need.
__________________
"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-BobMcNair
|